If Tyeforce really loves Other M then Tyeforce most likely doesn't really like Metroid and wouldn't enjoy Super Metroid. They'd be better served playing Metal Gear Solid. or God of War.
The franchise and gamers everywhere deserved better than Sakamoto's shit-in-a-box that greeted me when I unsealed the packaging.
Other M's story is no worse than 90% of video game stories, including "matoor" western developed games. I never had a problem with it.
Thank you so much! I've been looking for this for years.Here's the song in full, with all the bits that weren't used in the commercial. Great song.
I am completely dumbfounded by the lunacy people make up about the story. The story is actually rather short and simple, and mostly demonstrative through short sentences than some of the horrid offenders in the universe. It is completely forgettable and a capable of tolerating if you want to play the actual game. This isn't Metal Gear Solid 4 or Final Fantasy XIII.
To OP:
![]()
The franchise and gamers everywhere deserved better than Sakamoto's shit-in-a-box that greeted me when I unsealed the packaging.
It's my controversial opinion that almost all of the outrage over this game is fake, and all really boils down to betrayed fanboys not being given the character they'd spent the last 20 years conjuring in their heads.
Storyline? Fake.
Linearity? Fake.
Feminist outcry? Fake.
Gameplay complaints? Fake.
Had Prime 1 been released with OM's blathering Samus in - I suspect people would have reacted in exactly the same way. The game would've become a pariah and we'd have JPEGs of a completely different set of irrelevant "flaws" trying to pick apart the game in precisely the same wrong-headed attempts at retribution.
As usual I don't need to say anything, you said it all.Other M's story is no worse than 90% of video game stories, including "matoor" western developed games. I never had a problem with it.
IMO most of the outrage was due to Metroid being a sacred cow, combined with a dash of "you can't please fans" - story aside, half the audience wanted 2D Metroid only and hated Prime, and half the audience was "new blood" who wanted Prime 4 and felt anything else was regressive.
Honestly, I felt it was an interesting experiment and ended up being a fairly unique action adventure game compared to most anything out there. The only thing I'd change in it were the first person view "find the hidden object" scenes, as those did seem ill-conceived, or at least executed in the wrong way.
It's not as epic as a Prime game, and it's not as elaborate a 2D Metroid as Super Metroid or Metroid Fusion. Yet as a one-off it remains a very good game, and quality action adventure title.
I think some of those things on the image is really reaching. One thing Other M does really well is graphics and it's environments looked really good, though not as Prime good, that doesn't mean they were bad.To OP:
![]()
The franchise and gamers everywhere deserved better than Sakamoto's shit-in-a-box that greeted me when I unsealed the packaging.
It's my controversial opinion that almost all of the outrage over this game is fake, and all really boils down to betrayed fanboys not being given the character they'd spent the last 20 years conjuring in their heads.
Storyline? Fake.
Linearity? Fake.
Feminist outcry? Fake.
Gameplay complaints? Fake.
Had Prime 1 been released with OM's blathering Samus in - I suspect people would have reacted in exactly the same way. The game would've become a pariah and we'd have JPEGs of a completely different set of irrelevant "flaws" trying to pick apart the game in precisely the same wrong-headed attempts at retribution.
i'd say it deserves better/more respect
You're right. That Prime 3 one rocks. The music and his entrance is awesome. Just swooping down and acting animal-like attacking Samus the moment he hits the ground. Samus rolls out of the way, gets up, eyes his weak spot, and is like "Here we go again."
*boss fight*
Is this going to lead to another thread where you hyperbolically rave about the "text logs" in Metroid Prime and how they changed your life? But Other M was much more ambitious than Prime. Prime stuffed Metroid into a mechwarrior movement FPS and ultimately made a quality game out of it. Other M really tried to render an actual acrobatic 3D Samus but some cumbersome decisions spoiled the potential grandeur. Between Prime 3 and Other M. I think neither are great examples of what the franchise is capable of.
I am completely dumbfounded by the lunacy people make up about the story. The story is actually rather short and simple, and mostly demonstrative through short sentences than some of the horrid offenders in the universe. It is completely forgettable and a capable of tolerating if you want to play the actual game. This isn't Metal Gear Solid 4 or Final Fantasy XIII.
Metroid Other M is the only good Metroid on a home console in the past 13 years.
Metroid Other M is the only good Metroid on a home console in the past 13 years.
I honestly don't get how every bandwagoned on this. It's a solid little game. Yeah, the story was out of line from the Metroid canon, and the 3 pixel hunts were kind of annoying, but the rest of the game was very fun. But I guess everyone can't get over THE BABY to actually fucking judge the game.
I actually wish the godawful story and THE BABY was the only thing wrong with this game.
sure is easier to call the people on the opposite side of an argument "fakes" instead of actually having an opposing argument.
Also, yeah, if they put the dumb things in Other M into Metroid Prime, then people wouldn't have liked it as much.
Because they're dumb.
P.S. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqFm1ei6mjo
I am completely dumbfounded by the lunacy people make up about the story. The story is actually rather short and simple, and mostly demonstrative through short sentences than some of the horrid offenders in the universe. It is completely forgettable and a capable of tolerating if you want to play the actual game. This isn't Metal Gear Solid 4 or Final Fantasy XIII.
PokéKong;46630700 said:Okay if the story should be completely ignored, the pixel hunts should be ignored, the linearity should be forgiven and the battle system is at best competent, what is even the good meat of the experience then? Is the game's ingenious innovation of massive cone-shaped auto-aim range a truly redeeming feature?
PokéKong;46630700 said:Okay if the story should be completely ignored, the pixel hunts should be ignored, the linearity should be forgiven and the battle system is at best competent, what is even the good meat of the experience then? Is the game's ingenious innovation of massive cone-shaped auto-aim range a truly redeeming feature?
Has anyone mentioned how there are some parts of the game where your actual location does not reflect how it indicates you are on the map? And the fact that her basic yellow Power Suit at the beginning is just a recolored Varia Suit model?
There were also those slow behind-shoulder camera segments that teased you of a much potentially better game, reminding you of RE4 but for whatever reason never actually letting you SHOOT.
The game is such a hodgepodge of disjointed horrible ideas, it seems like the Other M apologists can simply point to whatever single idea they happened to enjoy and say "come on that other 90% doesn't really matter the REAL part of the game is GREAT!"
PokéKong;46630700 said:Okay if the story should be completely ignored, the pixel hunts should be ignored, the linearity should be forgiven and the battle system is at best competent, what is even the good meat of the experience then? Is the game's ingenious innovation of massive cone-shaped auto-aim range a truly redeeming feature?
Has anyone mentioned how there are some parts of the game where your actual location does not reflect how it indicates you are on the map? And the fact that her basic yellow Power Suit at the beginning is just a recolored Varia Suit model?
There were also those slow behind-shoulder camera segments that teased you of a much potentially better game, reminding you of RE4 but for whatever reason never actually letting you SHOOT.
The game is such a hodgepodge of disjointed horrible ideas, it seems like the Other M apologists can simply point to whatever single idea they happened to enjoy and say "come on that other 90% doesn't really matter the REAL part of the game is GREAT!"
It looks great, sounds great, plays great.
Believe it or not, that's enough for some.
The game is flawed, but not enough to warrant the amount of hate it receives. My argument has always been not that the game is great, but that it's not nearly as bad as the hyperbolic arguments against it and is at worst acceptable. Mainly I'm just against the bad arguments that tend to pop up with this game.
it doesn't look great........it's a 2010 wii title that's as technically good as a 2010 cube title, without the strong art direction of that title.
The music is forgettable....and the voice acting is bad.
and as for playing great? This is definitely the most subjective part. Samus is more agile than she was in prime, but the game has barely any good exploration, and gives you everything on a silver platter.
I liked the backtracking in the metroid series, even if it meant a shitload of experimentation before I figured out the best way to do something.
other m does all that for you, no thinking required.
People throw around the word hyperbole like it is candy at a candy store. To some people, like me, when we criticize this game we fuckin' mean it. No hyperbole.
bad arguements? I haven't seen any bad ones. I've seen subjective arguements, yes, but subjectivity goes both ways and if someone here loves it, i'm not going to say that they indeed didn't enjoy it........because, well, you know, I can't control what people like and dislike.
Time to post a classice from the anagram topic
![]()
Your complaints are far more valid than most. For instance, the people posting BABY gifs or the guy on the first page who read "I think it deserves more respect" and posted "*closes tab*." There's this monstrous hate machine for the game when it's mediocre at worst.
And still, your complaints are about how its mechanics make it a poor Metroid game, but not a poor game. It doesn't have exploration or item hunting. Neither does Halo.
People are trying to fit a new type of game into a metroidvania shaped hole and complaining when it doesn't fit.
it doesn't look great........it's a 2010 wii title that's as technically good as a 2010 cube title, without the strong art direction of that title.
The music is forgettable....and the voice acting is bad.
and as for playing great? This is definitely the most subjective part. Samus is more agile than she was in prime, but the game has barely any good exploration, and gives you everything on a silver platter.
I liked the backtracking in the metroid series, even if it meant a shitload of experimentation before I figured out the best way to do something.
other m does all that for you, no thinking required.
People throw around the word hyperbole like it is candy at a candy store. To some people, like me, when we criticize this game we fuckin' mean it. No hyperbole.
bad arguements? I haven't seen any bad ones. I've seen subjective arguements, yes, but subjectivity goes both ways and if someone here loves it, i'm not going to say that they indeed didn't enjoy it........because, well, you know, I can't control what people like and dislike.
Who gives a shit about the story in Metroid game, the other's didn't really have a story, so I just ignored this one. Actually I found it interesting they tried to actually have a narrative in the first place.
That said the gameplay was fun but I do agree the game is hot trash overall.
People are trying to fit a new type of game into a metroidvania shaped hole and complaining when it doesn't fit.