I am saying you don't normally know the beliefs of every person who works on a game unless those beliefs are somehow curated and brought to your attention.The fuck are you saying.
SF in their name is probably for San Francisco.The fuck are you saying.
At this point it's clear that you aren't talking to me but to some weird idea or strawman you have in your head. Don't quote me again please.
You still don't get it man.I am saying you don't normally know the beliefs of every person who works on a game unless those beliefs are somehow curated and brought to your attention.
What does the sound engineer for Shin Megami Tensei V think about Feminism? You don't fucking know. Why would you know or care about any of this normally?
Some of the clunkiest, boring looking combat I've ever seen, art style looks like a 1st person Torchlight. I guess if this is what the Xbox fan base thinks is "great" then they deserve everything they getIndy looks solid so Xbox *might* deliver one noteworthy game in 2024.
There should be a "yes if it's good" option. I really don't care about the politics of people who make games. I care if their game is well made and has a good story.
Better question to ask is “would you pay for Avowed”. A lot of folks with “Yes” got GamePass so it doesn’t take much to download and try it out.
Edit: Or rent from GameFly if that’s still around, as a rental is a cheap way to try the game. I think @Topher does that as an example.
Edit 2: Personally I am not planning to play it at least in the near future as it looks pretty mid and I very much disliked Outer Worlds. But if I sub for GamePass month to try something else, might give it a shot as well.
I voted Fuck Avowed because the game looks like shit/boring and has since the revealToo bad we can't see who voted what.
There should be a "yes if it's good" option. I really don't care about the politics of people who make games. I care if their game is well made and has a good story.
You still don't get it man.
It's not about what some dude working on a game thinks. It's about that dude making those hateful thoughts public, putting those thoughts into action and the company behind that dude doing nothing to stop any of that.
Quite different things, I think.
I don't have Twitter, I heard about it all here in this forum. Does that make a difference?Honest question: Did you follow that guy's Twitter before this, or did someone curate and present this tweet to you?
You've missed part of the drama then. On a tweet he said he would give women and people of color priority over white people. According to him, there are "too many scruffy white men" in the industry and he can't wait until he gets replaced by some minority. It's self-hating, and kinda nuts imo.Also, I gotta say, man, I don't think he said anything "racist" against straight white men, I think he said he wanted to trigger the chuds. Which is toxic, but there are plenty of "own the libs" types working on every game, why is this different?
It looked very uninteresting before the drama.
It's an affirmation of my narrative, at least. If you agree then why are you mad?I don't have Twitter, I heard about it all here in this forum. Does that make a difference?
I would say there's a pretty big difference between saying that you want to see more proportional representation and saying white people are bad. We can argue about the merit of that sort of thinking versus the more idealistic "colorblind" approach but the fact is that straight white men are most of who work in the game industry and no one is "coming for them" in a meaningful way.You've missed part of the drama then. On a tweet he said he would give women and people of color priority over white people. According to him, there are "too many scruffy white men" in the industry and he can't wait until he gets replaced by some minority. It's self-hating, and kinda nuts imo.
I mean sure, they should, anyone should. But it doesn't seem like any of that is actually going on in practice.Even Chris Avellone has stepped in, encouraging people to sue fucking Microsoft if they ever felt they were subjected to racist practices during their job interviews.
Exactly good sir. When a moron comes out and makes the ludicrous statements he did and the company allows him to do so, it shows they align with him. Anyone else would have been let go due to the negative effects it would have on the product. The gaming industry is plagued with so many of these hateful self absorbed weirdos that it will take a monumental effort to purge them if ever. Until then we can only speak with our wallets and our voices against these sick people and their woke trash games they peddle.You still don't get it man.
It's not about what some dude working on a game thinks. It's about that dude making those hateful thoughts public, putting those thoughts into action and the company behind that dude doing nothing to stop any of that.
Quite different things, I think.
and the company behind that dude doing nothing to stop any of that.
Honestly I don't even know what your point is with any of that.It's an affirmation of my narrative, at least. If you agree then why are you mad?
Where have I said that? No, what I meant is that the dude still has his job, so I guess Obsidian is fine with keeping someone like him around in a senior position.You’re saying the guy has continued to post a steady stream of faux pas? Source?
If you think the issue is one extra word you’re either clueless or being disingenuous."whole drama" -> an extra word included lmao.
i care about good games. just make a good game.