IDKFA
I am Become Bilbo Baggins
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f1a7/0f1a73f8ef79cec874c778ea627bc8a8f8d68556" alt="www.space.com"
'Doughnut UFO' over Switzerland defies explanation
A photographer in Zurich, Switzerland, spotted the glowing object while four SpaceX astronauts returned to Earth thousands of miles away.
Possibly, but it would need to be a huge light bar. You'd also still be able to see the shape of the drone underneath/above the light bar as it would be lighting up the whole device.
On a second note, god damn I really want UFOs to be real aliens from a different world. I just want confirmation that we're not alone in the universe. When I mean not alone, I mean life that's as advanced or even far more advanced than humanity.
Please, just make it so in my lifetime.
Movement in the right direction.![]()
‘This is urgent’: Bipartisan proposal for UFO office pushes new boundaries
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand says in an exclusive interview she is concerned about the impact of encounters on military personnel.www.politico.com
![]()
Secret MoD files reveal UFOs went to the top
Defence chief warned Mrs Thatcher that ignoring sighting was a 'banana-skin'www.google.com
The Rendelsham Forest incident of 1980 is still, IMO, the most compelling evidence we have of UFOs.
Nowadays, people can easily wave away UFO sightings as secret modern technology or drones, but that's a lot harder to do for an event that happened in 1980. It's even more compelling that it was seen by multiple military personnel. They didn't only see the things with their eyes, but there were also visible markings on the ground and unusual radiation traces I'm the area.
This is a pretty decent video (ignore the cartoon art style). The only one I could find that included the supposedly the original recording from the US troops who encountered the object. I have no idea if the recordings are real, but if they're fake then they're a decent fake.
There are multiple airmen from Rendlesham who have stepped up and gone on the record with their account of what went on that night.
He served as First Sea Lord and Chief of the Naval Staff and then Chief of the Defence Staff in early 1970s. In the latter role he gave the final commitment to Project Chevaline, the Polaris missile improvement programme. He went on to be Chairman of the NATO Military Committee.
IIRC they were all convinced it wasnt human but was under intelligent control. They were under no illusions as to how spectacular and strange the thing was.Did they all agree that it was an unexplained phenomenon, or did some fees up to a huge hoax?
They literally think every plastic bag flying in the wind is a UFO.Was debunked, a bird landing on a ledge.
Can't we get some level of quality going in this thread?
Some excitable types do, but not all of us. And not governments.They literally think every plastic bag flying in the wind is a UFO.
Was debunked, a bird landing on a ledge.
Can't we get some level of quality going in this thread?
i'm just trying to have a one night with thick alien chick. Maybe someday
Ok, most ufo vids are debunked, that's just a thing. But you can't just say "debunked" without a link at least.
If you're saying it's debunked throw up a source. All he's asking is that you put in the bare minimum of effort if you want anyone to take you seriously. I'm not even contesting the video being debunked, but put in the work.If you really are even remotely interested in this topic, you would have seen that video allready on other sources.
If you really are even remotely interested in this topic, you would have seen that video allready on other sources.
There was like 2 thousand people in that Reddit post and I didn't see the debunk posted, and it's a UFO community.
And I've asked you like 2 other times to clarify things and you've failed to do so each time. If it's an easy debunk cool, post it.
To be fair, the fact that they are part of a ufo community should be enough for you to side eye anything they say or do.
Actually its kind of annoying to be honest. Most of the responses are instantly 'this is fake', 'CGI' or 'debunked' and like some of the posts here they don't actually link to whatever refutation they're referring to. This leads to members accusing each other of either being charlatans or disinformation agents. FUD.If you know anything about that subreddit, it's equally about debunking if not more.
Seems pretty unusual for ballons or flares.
Easy
Those are birds. Probably covered in white feathers that reflect the sun light.
Either that or Chinese lanterns.
If it's easy, why is it birds OR lanterns?
Lanterns seems more feasible, but it's still unusual.
oooft Daivd Ike........up there with Greer for bullshit
Looks like a flock of birds with the sun shining on their white feathers. Either that or a squadron of Chinese lanterns. Could also be just reflections on the window, or a camera malfunction.
See. Simple explanation. I rest my case.
I mean if it’s birds OR lanterns might as well throw in an OR aliensLooks like a flock of birds with the sun shining on their white feathers. Either that or a squadron of Chinese lanterns. Could also be just reflections on the window, or a camera malfunction.
See. Simple explanation. I rest my case.
If it's so simple there shouldn't be very different options. You said it's easy to figure out, and in that case, you should have it down to an absolute choice. Otherwise, it's not that simple.
I mean if it’s birds OR lanterns might as well throw in an OR aliens
Seems pretty unusual for ballons or flares.
But others were quick to point out that the lights could be anti-missile flares shot from a warplane.
It is possible that jets could be carrying out wargames because the footage was shot in the hotly contested South China Sea.