• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X “Zen 5” First Apperance, Faster Than 14700K In Multi-Thread & Reaches 14900K Perf In Single-Core Tests

Bernoulli

M2 slut
The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X "Zen 5" CPU scored 53,863 points in multi-core tests and 4,652 points in the single-core tests. The single-core performance seems to be very close to Intel's Core i9-14900K which scores around 4700-4750 points while the multi-core performance of the chip tends to be slightly faster than the Intel Core i7-14700K which scores around 53,400 points.

The Core i7-14700K is a 20-core chip with boost clocks above 5 GHz while the Ryzen 9 9900X is a 12-core chip. Even the Core i9-14900K has boost clocks of up to 6.0 GHz which is a +400 MHz clock speed bump over the Ryzen 9 9900X. The CPU is also 9% faster in single-core and around 4% faster in multi-core tests versus the Ryzen 9 7900X CPU.



AMD-Ryzen-9-9900X-Zen-5-CPU-PassMark-Benchmarks.png


 

Hohenheim

Member
Bro thinks he will be able to nab a 5090 a year from now. I'm giving you 2 years before supply even becomes normal.
I had no trouble getting a 3090 and 4090 around launch. I don't think this will be any different!
If I had to wait two(!) years I would get a 6090 instead! :)
 
Last edited:

blastprocessor

The Amiga Brotherhood
Will await the reviews l want Geekbench scores as l have the M4 iPad Pro, which blows away the Zen 5 for single core.
 
Last edited:

Fahdis

Member
I had no trouble getting a 3090 and 4090 around launch. I don't think this will be any different!
If I had to wait two(!) years I would get a 6090 instead! :)

Lucky bum. I remember people sleeping out on the Best Buy sidewalk on a token system to get one after a year for the 3090.
 
The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X "Zen 5" CPU scored 53,863 points in multi-core tests and 4,652 points in the single-core tests. The single-core performance seems to be very close to Intel's Core i9-14900K which scores around 4700-4750 points while the multi-core performance of the chip tends to be slightly faster than the Intel Core i7-14700K which scores around 53,400 points.

The Core i7-14700K is a 20-core chip with boost clocks above 5 GHz while the Ryzen 9 9900X is a 12-core chip. Even the Core i9-14900K has boost clocks of up to 6.0 GHz which is a +400 MHz clock speed bump over the Ryzen 9 9900X. The CPU is also 9% faster in single-core and around 4% faster in multi-core tests versus the Ryzen 9 7900X CPU.



AMD-Ryzen-9-9900X-Zen-5-CPU-PassMark-Benchmarks.png


Not impressed but this is probably the platform I'll be upgrading to assuming AM5 will support Zen 6 after all.
 

Hohenheim

Member
Lucky bum. I remember people sleeping out on the Best Buy sidewalk on a token system to get one after a year for the 3090.
That's insane. Was this in USA? Seems very different from parts of europe, where these cards are available all the time.
 

StereoVsn

Gold Member
That's insane. Was this in USA? Seems very different from parts of europe, where these cards are available all the time.
3000 series cards were almost impossible to get at launch and during the duration of crypto boom and covid.

It really sucked. I paid like $1200 for my 3080Ti when they came out a year or so post vanilla launch.

Edit: 4090 was available on and off for MSRP until AI boom and GPU bans for China. After that $1600 MSRP disappeared basically.
 
Last edited:

Black_Stride

do not tempt fate do not contrain Wonder Woman's thighs do not do not
I paid 1200 euro's for a 3080 and felt lucky and sold it for 400 euro's and felt bad.

Ooooofffffff thats harsh.

I bought a 3070 and swapped it for the 3080'LHR a week before LHR was cracked.


No returns motherfucker!!!!
Then got a 3080'12G that fell off a truck cuz the 12Gs were impossible to LHR hack due to coming out after the Nvidia Leak.
Sold the 12G cuz it came with the box and all.

Now looks like I might find a 4080 somewhere somewhere....debating whether to jump on it for peanuts then skip the RTX50s or stick with the 3080'10G cuz with DLSS im not really struggling, the extra horsepower is just nice to have I guess.
 

Hohenheim

Member
3000 series cards were almost impossible to get at launch and during the duration of crypto boom and covid.

It really sucked. I paid like $1200 for my 3080Ti when they came out a year or so post vanilla launch.

Edit: 4090 was available on and off for MSRP until AI boom and GPU bans for China. After that $1600 MSRP disappeared basically.
Wow, that's sick. In Europe you could get the 3090 and 4090 at launch, and I don't think i've ever seen them out of stock for more than a couple of weeks.
 

Fahdis

Member
Wow, that's sick. In Europe you could get the 3090 and 4090 at launch, and I don't think i've ever seen them out of stock for more than a couple of weeks.

Where exactly are you in terms of country? Europeans get nickled and dimed like crazy vs. People in the US. The 3080 was $700 MSRP I believe on launch over here.
 

Hohenheim

Member
Where exactly are you in terms of country? Europeans get nickled and dimed like crazy vs. People in the US. The 3080 was $700 MSRP I believe on launch over here.
Norway.
Prices for high-end cards are pretty high here though. Just checked now, and the cheapest 4090 I saw was 1917 US dollars on a summer sale.
But these cards are always available.
 

Fahdis

Member
Norway.
Prices for high-end cards are pretty high here though. Just checked now, and the cheapest 4090 I saw was 1917 US dollars on a summer sale.
But these cards are always available.

Haha, sounds a tab bit expensive. I'm rocking a 4080 on Geforce Now.
 
Top Bottom