speculawyer
Member
A goofy defense based upon a goofy legal fiction. Why not?

A lone Marin drivers naughty sneak into the carpool lane could spell the end of corporate personhood as we know itor at least thats San Rafael resident Jonathan Friemans plan, as he heads to Marin Superior Court next week to challenge a traffic violation and, ultimately, the U.S. Supreme Courts Citizens United decision.
Frieman was heading south on Highway 101 through Novato on Oct. 2 when he was cited for violating California vehicle code 21655.5, which prohibits drivers from entering unauthorized vehicle lanesin Friemans case, being a solo occupant in a lane requiring two or more persons. But Frieman plans to contest the $478 violation in court on Jan. 7, arguing that he had corporate incorporation papers in his car at the time and, he says, the state vehicle code views corporations as personstherefore he and his corporation constituted a two-person carpool.
According to a press release from Kathleen Russell Consulting, the Mill Valley-based firm handling publicity for Friemans quest for justice, state vehicle code 470s definition of a person includes natural persons and corporations.
If he loses in court on Monday, continues the press release, Frieman says he is prepared to appeal the case all the way to the Supreme Court in an effort to expose the impracticality of corporate personhood.