The Worldwide Lockdown May Be The Greatest Mistake In HistoryCOVID-19 has blown the lid off the last vestiges of political restraint in modern centralized politics. It shows us what statist ideologues will dare to do when they are confident they can do what they want to do with few or no consequences.
Reaching Out While Staying InMichael Levitt, professor of structural biology at Stanford Medical School and winner of the 2013 Nobel Prize in chemistry, recently stated, “There is no doubt in my mind that when we come to look back on this, the damage done by lockdown will exceed any saving of lives by a huge factor.”
DOES GOD EXIST?So, let’s spend some of this stay-at-home time we now have to redouble our efforts to pray for our unsaved friends and neighbors. For some of us, this may mean developing a new discipline. For others it may be re-energizing an old one. Either way, we must “devote ourselves to prayer” (Col. 4:2) and “not lose heart” (Luke 18:1) in this important component of outreach.
Take the Shutdown Skeptics SeriouslyOne proof has to do with the existence of the universe. How did the universe come into being? This might seem like an obvious question, but philosophers weren’t always puzzled by this, since—for centuries—most believed the universe had no beginning at all. But many scientists now believe that the universe came into being very suddenly in what is called the “Big Bang.”
Franklin Graham Is Taking Down His N.Y. Hospital, but Not Going Quietly“Why should we assume that a crashing economy would leave the healthcare system standing?” Fleshing out the matter, she writes, “You can’t keep the hospital lights on without keeping on the lights of the economic sectors undergirding it. Yes, our doctors and nurses are running out of masks and gloves, which is a serious problem. It would also be a serious problem if we lost the means and the manpower to make more, or if the hospitals ran out of cash on hand to buy more beds, ventilators, etc. And there’s the rub. We are being told we can’t fight the virus without pausing the economy, yet we can’t fight the virus without the economy.”
His critics accuse him of discriminating against L.G.B.T. people. “Just because I don’t agree doesn’t mean I’m against them,” he said.
One nuance of christianity that often goes missed (and the christian church is to blame) is that the goal of the religion is to surrender authority to God, not to build an earthly authority to carry out God's commands. The underlying goal isn't to build up an "earthy kingdom" but to pave the way for God's kingdom (which comes from within). The goal is to elevate the earthly soul toward heavenly things, not to claim heavenly authority when carrying out "earthly" things (i.e. not to build an authoritarian-state structure that uses religion to control the populace). The ideal permeates our literature, our legal system, our culture, and it's fascinating to trace a lot of this stuff back to the good ol' Bible.
I view that as one of the key paradoxes of christianity and a source of much bloodshed and arguments (historically).Yes but we should not neglect the doctrine of the Social Kingship of Christ. The Old and New Testament both also attest that temporal authority is derived from God, even if the ephemeral rulers themselves govern poorly.
this is nice. God certainly must claim ultimate authority over all, it is the main function of his being. even when scientists use physics to rewind the clock and discover the origin of the universe, they find that it indeed emanates from a single source. a source which is one of limitless energy, which gives birth with a word to creation.One nuance of christianity that often goes missed (and the christian church is to blame) is that the goal of the religion is to surrender authority to God, not to build an earthly authority to carry out God's commands. The underlying goal isn't to build up an "earthy kingdom" but to pave the way for God's kingdom (which comes from within). The goal is to elevate the earthly soul toward heavenly things, not to claim heavenly authority when carrying out "earthly" things (i.e. not to build an authoritarian-state structure that uses religion to control the populace). The ideal permeates our literature, our legal system, our culture, and it's fascinating to trace a lot of this stuff back to the good ol' Bible.
The Bible is full of events that are both metaphor and historical. The principle events of creation in Genesis also have a lot of parallels to various psychological processes and natural relationships, if you are also willing to take the texts metaphorically and symbolically.this is nice. God certainly must claim ultimate authority over all, it is the main function of his being. even when scientists use physics to rewind the clock and discover the origin of the universe, they find that it indeed emanates from a single source. a source which is one of limitless energy, which gives birth with a word to creation.
on one level this can be taken as a metaphor for the act of creating itself. the "Cartesian idea" that we think in words is highly relevant in the Book of Genesis, and here, it is demonstrated. one must be able to communicate to the world, to the Earthly realm, the reality that one wishes to create. Genesis also demonstrates many truisms of the act of creation, such as that of Iteration. when creating something, whether it be a bicycle, or a surf board, or a film franchise, the natural evolution of creation, through successive iterations, allows more and more complexity to be introduced, as well as a meta framework that provides meaning generated from experiencing the series.
This goes along with what I mentioned above, so it sounds like I'm on the same page as you. Well put. The grand order of the universe and its iterative nature is a real thing. Large structures also appear on smaller scales and on even smaller scales, iterating in a predictable pattern. Even societal patterns are analogues to patterns in the family and patterns within an individual's psyche. The comprehensive order of everything that exists is absurd without an explanation of some kind.the more you practice, the better you get, this is an artistic truism that exists in every and all creative disciplines. the first person you will ever draw will probably be made of simple shapes; circles, lines, little else. the next one adds more complexity. by the time you have spent years, or decades, drawing people, your skills result in far more complex renderings. even AIs work in this way. so the book of Genesis does as well, starting with the most simplest elements (light) and gradually getting more complex (planets) and more complex (vegetable/animal kingdoms). the complexity increases, the universe is created almost fractally, simple elements bifurcating into complex.
I can't disagree with that.the existence of God and his face on the waters before the mention of "Let there be light" (the first creation) to me depicts that even before light, even in the paradoxical nonexistent dark, God was there, establishing his ultimate authority, giving comfort and grace to even those without light. from light we got into three dimensional objects, and Genesis has man formed from the clay of the Earth itself. Earthly life is part of us, we cannot deny it, and should not be ashamed of it, for it is a God given thing, Life. perhaps if they could get over their keyboard atheism Climate Change warriors would find a lot of pro-environment stuff in the first books of the Bible.
Well the absurd claim of christianity is not only that God exists but has a personal involvement with human history, not an aloof role as observer or all-calculating Intelligence sitting somewhere far. God is constantly punishing and bestowing miracles, supplying wisdom and sending into exile, rescuing and condemning. He has been a very involved God, but the tricky part is that we can't shrug and claim that it's all metaphorical. Whether someone draws the line at creation itself or says "well, the actual historical parts don't start until Abram and the covenant with his family", it implies that at some point in real human history, some of these things happened. And Christ is the most controversial claim of all since dead people don't generally come back to life after 3 days, nor rise into the sky with a bunch of people watching, reportedly.the way i see it, God is this underlying transcendent organizing principle, which is Love, and which binds the universe. the purpose of spiritual practice seems to be to experience that God, that love, which permeates all. "Luminous beings we are indeed". spiritual practice should calm the loud and distracting influence of Earthly things (which these days aren't even connected to physical planetary reality anymore but the hyper unreality of pop culture, social media and the internet) and let that underlying light shine through. imo spiritual and political concerns should really be detached, or at the very least, if you are a spiritual person, the last thing you should want to do is get into politics. of course this needs to be qualified with, there is nothing wrong if one is spiritual and decides to do so. religion is ultimately a personal experience, it is "living your truth", and i think political power should be available to almost everyone.
I view that as one of the key paradoxes of christianity and a source of much bloodshed and arguments (historically).
The Bible tells us to respect authority because God puts rulers in place. We are also told that God controls the heart of the king like channels of water in his palm. And the christian "plan" (in a manner of speaking) started by establishing an earthly body of apostles and converts who carried out their great commission. I agree that in order for the earthly church to function, we must still obey certain authorities within the church and set up a reasonable hierarchy. This all makes sense to me and is biblically sound. I'm also no stranger to the arguments surrounding papal primacy, the role of the earthly church body, and denominations, let me put it that way.
Where conflict arises for me is when a local church or even a church denomination squelches God's Spirit by sticking to the traditions of man instead of the guidance of Christ through the Holy Spirit. That is to say, if we assert that Christ is the active head of the Church not a far-off patron just watching us flail around, then we must assume he breathes life into the church through the action of the Holy Spirit.
But open your heart up to unsound teachings, and then a church may be caught up in other "winds of doctrine". These "winds" also try to "breathe" into the church, and a church without root can be completely uprooted and pulled away from the truth just like in Jesus's parable about the sower throwing seed down on rocky soil. I've seen it happen.
So it's both and neither. The earthly authority of the church cannot impart nor stand between the saving relationship between Christ and an individual soul. Yet, the church is not altogether worthless. It's in the middle. We are the imperfect bride. I attend a Lutheran church and I remind my wife that for hundreds of years, there was no "Bible" because there was no canon. Sola scriptura was the impetus for a whole lotta trouble. The church is the living history of the body of Christ, not something to be treated with suspicion which a more protestant mindset. I forget where you land demoninationally, Bolivar687 , so I apologize if I'm stepping on any toes.
I guess I would sum that rant up like this: the church is one big earthly organization that is stumbling toward becoming more Christ-like, imperfectly. We have to accept when our attempts are imperfect, yet our imperfect attempts do not discredit the role nor the authority of the church in the larger christian paradigm.
Yes, this last paragraph is definitely something that many protestants do not grasp. Catholics and Eastern Orthodox alike understand the relationship between church and scripture and tradition and history. It's a shame but it's pretty common for the average protestant (the giant umbrella including lutherans, baptists, charismatics, etc) to be uneducated on the origins of the Bible, especially the New Testament.No toes stepped on! From my experience in this thread we have a lot of common positions, especially in this post.
It's an interesting dynamic between scripture and tradition. I'm certainly no fan of sola scripture or man-made liturgical experimentation. We should follow Saint Paul's example, only humbly passing down that which we received from the Lord.
At the same time, tradition and ecclesiology are the stewards of scripture and the charism God has established with mankind. One example is how the Church compiled the biblical canon even before the Church Fathers with the translation of the Septuagint. The Bible is really the inspired written record of God interfacing with mankind through his consecrated and hierarchical priesthood.
There's an entire branch of study called hermeneutics, one of the precursors to modern science. Scrutinizing scripture through the lens of tradition and history is only natural. Being able to reference statements made by pre-canon church fathers alongside scripture passages can lead to a richer understanding of the scripture. It's a useful practice.The biggest debate in the Catholicism and perhaps Christianity more broadly for the last 150 years is whether we should scrutinize tradition through the lense of scripture, or if it's the other way around. I for the most part fall on the latter, subscribing to Pius XII's encyclical Humani Generis addressing this issue, attempting to pre-empt the changes which were to come afterwards. We confess an apostolic faith, so I respect doctrine developed within that continuity. Christ prayed for us to remain one, and once people detach themselves from the branch of St. Peter, the divisions never stop.
What about the legends from before the time Jesus came to Earth? Greek, Roman, Sumerian, Indian, Chinese and other legends depicting heroic feats. They are even mentioned in the Bible Genesis 6:4 The Nephilim were on the earth in those days—and also afterward—when the sons of God went to the daughters of humans and had children by them. They were the heroes of old, men of renown.
Western civilization, it seems to me, stands by two great heritages. One is the scientific spirit of adventure — the adventure into the unknown, an unknown which must be recognized as being unknown in order to be explored; the demand that the unanswerable mysteries of the universe remain unanswered; the attitude that all is uncertain; to summarize it — the humility of the intellect. The other great heritage is Christian ethics — the basis of action on love, the brotherhood of all men, the value of the individual — the humility of the spirit.
These two heritages are logically, thoroughly consistent. But logic is not all; one needs one's heart to follow an idea. If people are going back to religion, what are they going back to? Is the modern church a place to give comfort to a man who doubts God — more, one who disbelieves in God? Is the modern church a place to give comfort and encouragement to the value of such doubts? So far, have we not drawn strength and comfort to maintain the one or the other of these consistent heritages in a way which attacks the values of the other? Is this unavoidable? How can we draw inspiration to support these two pillars of western civilization so that they may stand together in full vigor, mutually unafraid? Is this not the central problem of our time?
"In playing through Final Fantasy VII Remake, I couldn’t help but reflect on the value my own faith tradition places on the act of retelling. As Christians, our history, our community, and our rituals are founded on the eternal telling of the central story of human history. As James K.A. Smith describes in Desiring the Kingdom, “we humans are liturgical animals . . . our loves and desires are aimed and directed by habits that dispose us to be the kind of people aimed at certain visions of the good life.” Our liturgies are a habituation of the Gospel, and in embodying it through our love for neighbor and our care for the marginalized, we, too, retell our history as a source of revelation."
Video: Douglas Murray | The Ben Shapiro Show Sunday Special Ep. 95The Bible is not a puritanical document that forbids sensory pleasure. Psalm 23 displays a remarkable sensitivity to visual, auditory and tactile satisfaction through its description of lying down in "green pastures" and walking besides "quiet waters" (v. 2).[16] Christ enjoyed dinner parties and was even accused, though unfairly, of being "a glutton and a drunkard" (Luke 7:34). He was questioned as to why his disciples continued to eat and drink when John the Baptist’s disciples fasted and prayed (Matthew 9:14-16; Mark 2:18-22; Luke 5:33-39 and Luke 7:36).
British author and journalist Douglas Murray stops by to discuss the U.K.'s response to the Coronavirus, his new book, The Madness of Crowds: Gender, Race, and Identity, the destruction of Europe, the difference between conservatism in the U.K. and the U.S., his thoughts on President Trump and the Royal family, and much more.
Podcast: Suffering, the End of Life and Assisted Suicide — Part 2Love for one’s enemies is Jesus’ radical alternative to the world’s way of loving neighbors and hating enemies, but “undiscriminating love will mark disciples out as sons of your Father, for the son shares the father’s character, and it is the character of God to dispense his natural blessings on all alike.”5 Jesus says, “[God] makes his sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust.” (Matt. 5:45).
How will COVID-19 change the world?Dealing with the inevitable losses and suffering that come at the end of life are often what motivates a request for assisted suicide. Yet there can be ways of dealing with suffering without eliminating the sufferer. Join Scott and Sean in part two of their interview pro-life advocate Stephanie Gray in a conversation about suffering and the end of life, in her new book To Assist or Not to Assist: A Life Affirming Reflection on the Universal Experience of Suffering.
Why Witchcraft Is on the RiseThere are two obvious conclusions that we can draw thus far. First, even the experts have little idea where we will be in 6 months time, in terms of fighting the disease, social health, and global and local economics. Second, built into this pandemic, including responses made by Governments across the world, are some long term changes to society.
Why Western Intellectuals Are Dreaming Christian DreamsThroughout history, attempts to control women have masqueraded as crackdowns on witchcraft, and for some people, simply self-identifying as a witch—a symbol of strong female power, especially in the face of the violent, misogynistic backlash that can greet it—is a form of activism. “Witchcraft is feminism, it’s inherently political,” Gabriela Herstik, a witch and an author, told Sabat magazine. “It’s always been about the outsider, about the woman who doesn’t do what the church or patriarchy wants.”
Video: "Pensées," by Blaise Pascal (Part 1/2) | Graham H. Walker and David J. TherouxOther intellectuals like Steven Pinker, Sam Harris, and Yuval Noah Harari point to scientific and technological advancement as the best hope for the future. They see religion as a relic of the past, with little or no use in the 21st century. The hope is that AI will usher the world into a scientific utopia where almost all disease and suffering are eradicated, happiness is finally achieved, and humans are amortal (Harari’s term), living indefinitely.
“I know no pre-twentieth-century book except for the Bible that shoots Christian arrows farther into modern pagan hearts than the 'Pensées.' I have taught ‘Great Books’ classes for twenty years, and every year my students sit silent, even awed, at Pascal more than at any other of the forty great thinkers we cover throughout the history of Western philosophy and theology.” —Peter Kreeft, Professor of Philosophy, Boston College
Historian Tom Holland, author of ‘Dominion’ recaps his debate with AC Grayling and talks about his recent article for The Telegraph arguing for the Christian roots of the response we are seeing to the Coronavirus pandemic.
Dr. Craig and Dr. Joshua Swamidass discuss their varying viewpoints concerning the historical Adam and Eve.
Is the God of the Old Testament a “genocidal” maniac as atheist provocateur Richard Dawkins has alleged? Many think so. The fact is, many Christians don’t know what to make of the God of the O.T. The Great Flood, the killing of the Egyptian firstborn, the fate of Sodom & Gomorrah—it all seems very confusing and inconsistent with the idea that “God is Love.”
In this livestream, Dr. Sean McDowell joins me to discuss and review his recent debate with Paulogia on @Unbelievable? about the martyrdom of the apostles. The last section of this interview features live Q&A with Dr. McDowell!
RZIM Asia-Pacific Regional Director Max Jeganathan suggests that truth is indispensable, suffering is unavoidable, and happiness is not enough, and breaks down what Christianity says about all three
Christ is our Great Physician, and that is a powerful identity. Doctors and nurses have been the most inspiring heroes of this season. Health-care workers brave the frontlines to care for the sick and wounded, knowing all too well the contagiousness of the virus they’re up against. They place themselves at risk of contracting, in this microbiological warfare, the very condition they seek to cure.
I believe it. I used to read often about Jesus’ words and try my best to follow them, I prayed a lot too. I believe God gives in ways in which we need. A lot was wrong in in my life but God always seemed to give me peace of mind in those times. And there was a lot that would have set me off today, but back then it was as if nothing or no one could affect me really. My emotional intelligence was high powered and I had a fairly strong grasp on a lot of thingsCutty Flam I had/have a similar problem as you. I talked about this with my confessor, I seriously considered psychiatric help but in recent months my anger issues have improved considerably, so much so that the people around me are more and more coming out and saying that they noticed I have become a lot nicer and more pleasant to be around. I'm not sure what happened, but the same situations that made me lose my mind just a few months back now make me laugh or I just wave them off. The only major difference I can remember is that I prayed, sincerely, that God would take me by my hands and guide me and I will give myself to him fully come hell or high water. I made no demands, just "your will be done". Other than that I'm not sure what could have improved my mood so drastically and so quickly. I haven't had any major, life altering changes or anything of the sort.
The strangest thing, right, is that it didn't even occur to me to be angry. Back then I had to try hard to suppress that anger but now I don't even start to get angry in the same exact situations.I believe it. I used to read often about Jesus’ words and try my best to follow them, I prayed a lot too. I believe God gives in ways in which we need. A lot was wrong in in my life but God always seemed to give me peace of mind in those times. And there was a lot that would have set me off today, but back then it was as if nothing or no one could affect me really. My emotional intelligence was high powered and I had a fairly strong grasp on a lot of things
Thank you. I think I need to be in deep thought and conversation with Our Father more often so I’ll pray
Any thoughts on “Anger”
I could use some advice. I’ve always had intense anger issues. It’s gotten worse over the years, worse and worse. To the point where, in recent years, I’ve actually feared the evil in my heart and have seen how destructive, potentially, it can build to
For example, I was so angry over something small in the grand scheme of things, over a friend essentially cheating me out of some money that I had evil, vile, just very angry and hateful and dangerous thoughts. My anger was manifesting into mental wrath it seemed. I don’t think I have ever felt so ashamed in my life, once I had realized just how inhumanely I was thinking towards my friend. Never so ashamed of myself in my life
I want to change, I want to heal, and I want to have a broad understanding of what ager is, what it can do, and what it will take to fight it all from a biblical and eternal perspective
But as I understand it currently, even God has anger and wrath and will express it to his creation(s)? In certain ways?
I’ve had many losing battles with anger, to the point where my mind is basically useless that evening due to the static it caused in my brain. When I get extremely angry, it’s almost like my faculties are hanging by a thread and it’s just a very sad feeling because I know all I can do is sleep and pray to regain my balance. I’d say I’ve had like a half dozen or so evenings where I was severely pissed off like that and was stuck in my head with unreal thoughts—all fueled by hatred and anger
Any thoughts on this will be appreciated beyond what you can know. This has been a lifelong battle and maybe I need to look at it from a different angle to see it clearly and to find a solution. Or maybe anger is a gift and a curse in a way? Not really sure, all I know is I want to change and have for years but never seem to cover substantial ground. It all boils down to not knowing much about it I’m sure
Any insight? I felt like this thread would have some very wise problem solvers and simply very wise people in general. I would definitely think deeply upon any advice
Obituary: Ravi ZachariasIt was his Savior, Jesus Christ, that my dad always wanted most to talk about. Even in his final days, until he lacked the energy and breath to speak, he turned every conversation to Jesus and what the Lord had done. He perpetually marveled that God took a seventeen-year-old skeptic, defeated in hopelessness and unbelief, and called him into a life of glorious hope and belief in the truth of Scripture—a message he would carry across the globe for 48 years.
Ravi Zacharias (1946–2020) and His LegacyWhen Ravi Zacharias was a cricket-loving boy on the streets of India, his mother called him in to meet the local sari-seller-turned-palm reader. “Looking at your future, Ravi Baba, you will not travel far or very much in your life,” he declared. “That’s what the lines on your hand tell me. There is no future for you abroad.”
3 Lessons I Learned from Working with Ravi ZachariasZacharias draws on a range of apologetic approaches, which he weaves into his presentations. We have already noted the importance of Geisler, Lewis, and Schaeffer; this list can easily be extended to include writers such as G. K. Chesterton and Fyodor Dostoyevsky. This shouldn’t, however, be understood to imply that Zacharias is a derivative thinker, lacking originality. His “3-4-5 Grid” is a good example of his own distinct approach, which emphasizes the importance of a worldview’s rationality, while insisting that its existential importance cannot be overlooked. The issue isn’t simply whether a worldview is rational; the deeper question is whether it is liveable.
Ravi Zacharias (1946-2020): Evangelist, preacher, friendRavi’s message wasn’t so much the intellectual credibility of the faith (though he has done more than anyone else in this generation to commend that); it was Christ crucified. When Paul said, “I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ and him crucified” (1 Cor. 2:2), he didn’t mean that he only talked about the cross; rather, he meant the cross was the animating heart of everything he did say. Ravi’s goal wasn’t to demonstrate the shallowness of, say, secular thinking; his goal was to present Christ. He didn’t preach an argument; he used argumentation to preach a person.
So, where did his courage and confidence rest if not in academic accolades? First and foremost, his trust was in Christ. He had a devoted personal commitment to Christ and a deep life of prayer and studying the scriptures. But I believe that the muscles of his courage were also profoundly shaped by his early preaching tour of the Far East. In 1971 as a 25-year-old Ravi went to Vietnam where he preached up and down the country to US military personnel and to captured Vietcong members. On various occasions he barely escaped with his life. The scale of the response to the gospel in that time and in a further trip in 1974 to Cambodia, built a confidence in him that it is God who rescues and saves and that the work of the evangelist is a calling from God. And Ravi Zacharias was an evangelist to the end.
Last week, an article in The Atlantic brought renewed attention to the political cult known as QAnon. As Adrienne LaFrance writes, “To look at QAnon is to see not just a conspiracy theory but the birth of a new religion.” About three-quarters of U.S. adults (76 percent) say they have heard or read nothing at all about QAnon. But while they may not know the name, they have likely seen QAnon propaganda on social media (President Trump has frequently retweeted QAnon-related accounts on Twitter, and some parenting and lifestyle “influencers” promote the views on Instagram, YouTube, and Facebook). Although it’s still on the fringe, Christians should be aware of the threat this political cult poses to the global church.
You are very frustrated, I understand that but I am certain you will feel different once you let it roll around in your head for a while. Taking someone's life is a one-way street, it will change you to some extent, it does some more than others. I know it is infuriating to have your possessions, your privacy and safety violated. I know that since I was a victim of crimes many times in my life, including burglary and I know the anger and desire to see the person suffer terribly, but that isn't the right way.snip
Thanks for the reply man. I read it. I’m going to read it a few more times or so in the day or so to come as well. And think deeply on it. I know it’s not right to kill, so maybe I’ll consider more strategies to hinder the thief. I was thinking writing a sincere and powerful letter and putting it on the window speaking about God and Jesus and the truthYou are very frustrated, I understand that but I am certain you will feel different once you let it roll around in your head for a while. Taking someone's life is a one-way street, it will change you to some extent, it does some more than others. I know it is infuriating to have your possessions, your privacy and safety violated. I know that since I was a victim of crimes many times in my life, including burglary and I know the anger and desire to see the person suffer terribly, but that isn't the right way.
It may sound weird but you should also think about the thief just a little bit, we are all God's children and maybe (just a tiny maybe but nevertheless) he is in some very terrible situation that, in a way, could have forced him into a life of crime, be it bad parenting, sick relatives, bad role-models etc.
Getting a CCW is never a wrong thing to do imo. I am from Europe but I very much understand the importance of the 2nd amendment. I personally would think twice before shooting someone but using it as a tool to intimidate a burglar is not a bad thing, but shooting someone in the back is. I don't think there is a single state in America where shooting a man running away from you is justifiable.
So, what would I do. Get CCW but also get a few cameras, install them around or inside your car and let them record the culprit. You can then bring the recording to the police. If that doesn't help then I'm not sure what I would do. Maybe park the cars somewhere else for a while. He could lose interest in them.
The absolute most ideal situation (we are approaching fantasy land territory) would be to confront the thief and talk with him, offer him help or something. I know it sounds a bit crazy but I think everyone deserves a chance at a good life, not just one chance but all the chances we can give them.
When it comes to theology, then God does not enjoy death but knows that it is sometimes necessary in the current cosmic situation we find ourselves in (being outside of the Paradise and the Kingdom of Heaven and all) but only as a last resort to help end suffering. Therefore, don't kill unless it is the direst of circumstances: your life is in danger, your relatives are in danger, any person at all really if it is in danger, Nazis/Commies took over your neighborhood/Europe etc. Deadly force should only be used to liberate others, never to conquer.
You could also try praying for the thief to grow a conscience, wouldn't hurt to try.
Just my 2¢.
Stay strong, brother. And know that we love you, God loves you, you are a child of God and God will always, no matter what, love you with his infinite love.
Ask God to show you how to resolve it and then sit on your hands for a bit. If you are serious about wanting a way forward that fixes the issue but also honors God, ask for guidance in prayer. Who knows what kind of answer or solution will appear.Have an issue I could use some advice on
My car was stolen a month ago. Took one month to get it back. Was very lucky that the thief was an idiot. Well, the thief is back maybe with an accomplice because two of my cars have been broken into now. They seem to want ours more than anything. I’m about to buy a couple of steering wheel locks, and I’m also going to take steps towards getting a CCW for protection as well as a shotgun. When I finally get that handgun, I hope I never have to use it, but if I see that fucker inside my truck (I have a clear view of it in a few different spots, I’m going to shoot and it will likely hit knowing my level of precision. They stole my car already, they tried to steal more stiff last night, they stole a car five streets down from me, a really nice little neigborhood I walk around all the time. I have a very keen ear, and I can be just as quiet in my stealthy movement. If I catch them slipping, I’m shooting, and I am shooting to kill. There may be laws in place in my strict anti-gun State of CA but I don’t care. I’m not going to let a coward to from me or mine and get away. If I can, I’m taking his life with a bullet and sending a message. And it makes sense too, because an intelligent thief comes ready with weaponry. It is even said in the bible that thieves have cone to kill I’m pretty sure
I know it’s wrong to kill. But it’s my life of his/hers? and I don’t believe causing fear and stealing something that affects my very own livelihood deserves any kind of pass. I’ve made up my mind to kill the man w he n the time comes if and when it comes
What are your thoughts, from a biblical perspective, eternal perspective, what would God likely be saying to me?
I know at all costs, I should never kill if I can avoid it, but they’re invading my territory and they’re actively trying to claim what isn’t theirs at my expense. If there was an emergency and I was alone with myself or with somebody who needed help and I couldn't rush them to the hospital, and had to call for an ambulance? Those minutes could the deciding factor of whether one lives or dies. Minutes. Transportation is so crucial to survival. And higher quality of life if you want to get down to it, and go more in depth. So this thief is putting my life in potential danger in several ways
I am furious. I want justice, and I know cops can only do so much. The only thing holding me back, is staying safe for my family’s sake, this state that has backwards laws involving guns and protection, and God is the ultimate influence on my decision. I know He knows my heart and all of our hearts. That’s why I want the most logical situation to this situation. Something I know that wont bring shame to myself and others. I want to glorify God, but this world can be hell sometimes. How can I simply turn the other cheek in this situation? Is there a way? This is survival and we all die anyway. I have a choice to make. I’m willing to live with taking a life if it means that life belongs to a coward
In this engaging livestream, Dr. Andy Bannister, who holds a PhD in Islamic studies, provides 3 reasons why Muslims ought to seriously consider the truth of Christianity.
Justin hosts a tribute show to Christian apologist and evangelist Ravi Zacharias (1946-2020). He is joined by RZIM leaders Amy Orr-Ewing, Vince Vitale & Abdu Murray who share personal memories and reflect on his life and legacy.
Podcast: 'Evidence for Old Testament History: From Abraham’s Ur to Daniel in Babylon'You say that the holy is "the presence of the limitless that is always present by his nature...." There is truth in that. God is omnipresent. But there is more to holiness than that. God is pure – morally. He cannot even look upon evil. There is a deep beauty in holiness. Holiness is not a miserable religious person looking down on everyone else – but what the Bible calls the 'beauty of the Lord our God'. Most of all we see that beauty in the person of Christ who is 'the altogether lovely one'. To know him is to know ultimate love, truth and beauty.
The Pandemic of FearEdited audio of my webinar from the virtual European Leadership Forum (ELF) conference 2020.
Perhaps churches will need to do the same for much of the British population as we come out of the Covid-19 crisis. The trouble is that the government, aided by the media, has been far too effective in instilling fear in people. Fear, shame and guilt are great ways to control people. When you are told that if you go for a walk in the country you are ‘killing people’, or if you visit your elderly parents you are ‘destroying the NHS’, it can be a powerful motivation.
The first thing you have to realize is that the Bible is a book of experiences with the Living God. So the best way to start is to read it yourself and try to put yourself in the story as an observer, imagine Jesus talking to you. Once you get that, you can start hunting on-line for all kinds of articles by all kinds of Bible scholars and how they interpret the texts. Their interpretations will be varied, depending on where they come from, what denomination they are part and what school they attended. It is a wild west when it comes to understanding the Bible, my friend, but always start with yourself. Read the texts, listen to them speaking to you and once you have an understanding you can look at other people's experiences.Best Bible App?
I need one with teachings of every verse, ideally. There’s so much I fucked up in the past when reading the bible in my late teens. I took a lot of stuff literally because I didn’t know any better, and caused some hardships for myself. Nothing serious type harm, but I do want to learn more and get closer to God and Jesus and align with their teachings and ways
I’m not too sharp with the content of the bible. Never went to church in my life. Literally all that I know is what I have read myself and from what I have asked others online when I had questions
If anyone has a really good app they like and can recommend, I’ll download it. I want to go back to the life I lived when God was a huge factor in terms of how I thought, acted, and lived my life. And if I am ever strong enough to do so, I hope to bring glory to Him one day
Best Bible App?
I need one with teachings of every verse, ideally. There’s so much I fucked up in the past when reading the bible in my late teens. I took a lot of stuff literally because I didn’t know any better, and caused some hardships for myself.
Well, there you have it, Cutty. Pretty much what I saidI am an amateur literary critic who hopes to go pro one day. The rule I try to follow is something I originally saw attributed to Anthony Hopkins: read a text over and over until you inhabit it. The text will eventually overcome your misconceptions, and make you aware of the assumptions that you are bringing to it. A great writer reads you with his or her text, and it would be a shame to defeat that process, or give over that pleasure to another text.
Here is another problem with this: if you ask a Catholic, Lutheran and Episcopalian which commentary is the best or most objective, obviously they are going to recommend something which, in the long run, will make you interpret the Bible like a Catholic, Lutheran and Episcopalian. All commentaries run this risk, even if they claim to be something else: I have a friend who had this Bible with a ‘moral commentary’ on each verse, and it made me want to throw the book out the window it was so insipid, committing atrocities like turning the Song of Songs into a small catalogue of moral rules. As Bultmann said, “There is no presuppositionless exegesis.”
With that said, clearly you should have something for basic information like where the land of Ur was, maybe a small bio on Bildad the Shuhite or Melchizedek, and so on, but please, do your best to make sure that outside resources fill in the occasional blank, rather than providing the skeleton.
Pretty much the sameWell, there you have it, Cutty. Pretty much what I said
How do you join the christians?
Great advice. I'll start reading the bible more often. I'm a fan of the King James Version the one with the old style writing. If I knew Hebrew, I'd imagine that would be the best way to read the bible? Because that was the earliest transcribed version and most accurate? But you're right, I think I will cover more ground that way, and will come to more truths if I'm not constantly looking into others' interpretations most likely. I'll stick to looking up things I don't understand at all and just keep trying to progressI am an amateur literary critic who hopes to go pro one day. The rule I try to follow is something I originally saw attributed to Anthony Hopkins: read a text over and over until you inhabit it. The text will eventually overcome your misconceptions, and make you aware of the assumptions that you are bringing to it. A great writer reads you with his or her text, and it would be a shame to defeat that process, or give over that pleasure to another text.
Here is another problem with this: if you ask a Catholic, Lutheran and Episcopalian which commentary is the best or most objective, obviously they are going to recommend something which, in the long run, will make you interpret the Bible like a Catholic, Lutheran and Episcopalian. All commentaries run this risk, even if they claim to be something else: I have a friend who had this Bible with a ‘moral commentary’ on each verse, and it made me want to throw the book out the window it was so insipid, committing atrocities like turning the Song of Songs into a small catalogue of moral rules. As Bultmann said, “There is no presuppositionless exegesis.”
With that said, clearly you should have something for basic information like where the land of Ur was, maybe a small bio on Bildad the Shuhite or Melchizedek, and so on, but please, do your best to make sure that outside resources fill in the occasional blank, rather than providing the skeleton.
No prob Cutty. I like the King James version best as well. Progress in study is marked, in part, by asking continually better questions. Another thing I would suggest is to get a version that is easy on the eyes. Most Bibles are printed in columns with tiny print- to save space obviously- but I find it so much easier to breathe on a clean page with regular sized text.Great advice. I'll start reading the bible more often. I'm a fan of the King James Version the one with the old style writing. If I knew Hebrew, I'd imagine that would be the best way to read the bible? Because that was the earliest transcribed version and most accurate? But you're right, I think I will cover more ground that way, and will come to more truths if I'm not constantly looking into others' interpretations most likely. I'll stick to looking up things I don't understand at all and just keep trying to progress
Thanks Scotty
Hebrew for the Old Testament but Koiné Greek for the New Testament. You can read the original texts in Greek if you know the language. There are some differences but they are minor and are only helpful when you dive into tiny details, like for example that the Ark Noah uses is described as a "box" and not as a ship.If I knew Hebrew, I'd imagine that would be the best way to read the bible? Because that was the earliest transcribed version and most accurate?
Ministers of Justice“I couldn’t help but think of the many other veterans for whom #MemorialDay has a face; it’s not just a date... For so many veterans and those who didn’t serve but whose loved ones served and never came home, Memorial Day isn’t a concept or abstraction. It’s visceral. It’s real. That makes the reason for the memorial—their sacrifice—more than an abstract concept. Sacrifice is visceral. Sacrifice is real.”
Never Give In, Never, Never, Never, 1941Normandy is seeded with American dead because America joined with her allies to tell the innocent victims of Nazis malevolence that they were greatly esteemed. The innocent needed to be protected and rescued, things taken needed to be restored to their rightful owners, an evil regime needed to be discredit, resisted, punished, and stopped; and its ability to do further evil destroyed. That American youths had to travel to foreign lands to do so is not glorious. Per Truscott, that many had to die in order to do so was not glorious. But, pace Truscott, that so many were willing to do so is, I assert, glorious. Those who died can rest well knowing they were called to be their brothers’ keepers, and they were not found insufficient. Truscott, I trust, would agree.
A Day of Grief in a Season of GriefWhen Churchill visited Harrow on October 29 to hear the traditional songs again, he discovered that an additional verse had been added to one of them.
The death taboo and cult of safety make living much harderToo many Americans have been unable to share their sorrow.
Audio: S3 E7: Biblical Series – Walking with God Noah and the FloodThe great safety-industrial complex cannot eliminate death. But fear of it still curtails things that make life worth living.
Audio: Pastoral Care and Suicide - Part 2We are revisiting Jordan B. Peterson’s Biblical Series during a time when we believe it to be helpful. In this episode, Dr. Peterson presents another lecture and Q&A on the Bible. To comment on this episode, log into thinkspot and click on Dr. Peterson’s Profile.
Video: The New Investigation of the Resurrection: A Conversation with Andrew LokeContinuing the conversation from last week, Kay Bruce (Psy.D), offers more insights about shepherding and leading those who are struggling into a greater hope.
What does the latest evidence show about the resurrection of Jesus? How are naturalistic alternatives faring? Sean interviews professor Andrew Loke about his latest book INVESTIGATING THE RESURRECTION OF JESUS CHRIST.
In this in-person interview, I sit down with Alisa Childers to discuss "Progressive Christianity." Is this new movement dangerous to Christianity?
Religiosity has become a dividing line in the culture war and in politics. Why? Are secularist disabled by their inability to comprehend because they intentionally dismiss religious language? We'll take a good look at a conversation between Michael and Karen and examine whether Zizek and Zero Day can really understand what Jordan was up to.
one good resource i discovered is a book called Everyman's Talmud. this is a plainly written book that is a kind of classic in the Jewish community, and it greatly expounds upon the many meanings in the Jewish Bible. so it goes into a lot of depth about the Book of Genesis, Exodus, all of the classic OT stories, and it brings in the perspective of the Jewish traditions that informed those writings to begin with. it has tons of Jewish folk stories and wisdom that lends context to so much in the Bible. no need to read Hebrew if you can read the classical interpretations of learned Rabbis. i highly recommend it.Great advice. I'll start reading the bible more often. I'm a fan of the King James Version the one with the old style writing. If I knew Hebrew, I'd imagine that would be the best way to read the bible? Because that was the earliest transcribed version and most accurate? But you're right, I think I will cover more ground that way, and will come to more truths if I'm not constantly looking into others' interpretations most likely. I'll stick to looking up things I don't understand at all and just keep trying to progress
Thanks Scotty
Long regarded as the classic introduction to the teachings of the Talmud, this comprehensive and masterly distillation summarizes the wisdom of the rabbinic sages on the dominant themes of Judaism: the doctrine of God; God and the universe; the soul and its destiny; prophesy and revelation; physical life; moral life and social living; law, ethics, and jurisprudence; legends and folk traditions; the Messiah and the world to come.
Ravi Zacharias Buried in Casket Built by PrisonersThis free PDF ebook explores some of the key differences between Islam and Christianity; looks at the core beliefs of our Muslim friends and how they differ from what Christians believe; and helps Christians learn ways to more effectively share our faith in Jesus with Muslim friends and neighbours.
The Irish Monks saved civilisation. They have much to teach our post-pandemic world“Our hope is as certain as Jesus’s grave is empty,” said Sam Allberry in solemn graveside service.
How apocalyptic is now?There will be significant opportunities ahead for the Church, says David Stroud, as he suggests learning lessons from ancient Irish Monks
Research Using Cells of Illicit Origin and Vaccines from Fetal Tissue“If the term ‘apocalypse’ fits any event in recent world history, it is the Russian Civil War. This is not to suggest that the events of 1917-20 were the end of the world. The revolutionaries saw what was happening as the beginning of a new human order, and if they did not, in fact, establish a New Jerusalem, we can see, seventy years later, that they certainly created in Russia something remarkable and enduring. But their hold on power was bought at the price of great suffering and an unknown but terrible number of deaths — perhaps seven to ten million in all. War and strife, famine and pestilence — the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse — devastated the largest country in Europe…”
Video: Jordan Peterson and Christian Humanism (Esther O'Reilly)Both scientific researchers in a race for a vaccine for COVID-19 and pro-life citizens (including parents) have such responsibilities. In both cases, I have argued, pro-life researchers and citizens may acceptably judge that such proportionate reasons do not hold without compromise to their pro-life principles and witness.
Esther O'Reilly joins me to discuss Christian Humanism and her work in the recent Lexham Press volume to which we both contributed a chapter, 'Myth and Meaning in Jordan Peterson'
Western democracies have long celebrated free speech and free religious expression. Yet history tells a different story. Religious freedom is not the historical norm; for example, our predecessors in the first century church worshiped in a hostile environment. Our heritage as believers predates the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other governmental edicts. What does it mean to clearly understand that our hope resides not in pronouncements by governments, but on Him who spoke the world into existence?
What if your opinions on marriage, family, and human dignity are based on the Bible but are considered ‘offensive’ to unbelievers? Are you still allowed to express them in public and private settings? Is talking about Jesus’ teaching hate speech? Are we witnessing a new form of censorship? Is one of our most fundamental freedoms threatened in Europe? How should we respond?
Freedom of thought, conscience, and religion are among the fundamental individual liberties which are protected at a constitutional and international level. Do Christians still have the right to a voice in the public square and how can we engage with contemporary culture? We believe that Jesus is Lord and so, using biblical examples, this session discusses how we can speak the Truth and work for the good of society.
Video: Where is God in a Coronavirus World?In cancel culture, a single mistake is perpetually unforgivable because it’s not simply a guilty act. Rather, the mistake defines the individual’s identity, turning them into a shameful person—someone who can be “canceled.” How Eastern! Juliet November summed up what used to be the differences between Western and Eastern cultures: In a Western framework, I would feel guilty because I have “done something bad”; in an Eastern honor-shame framework, I would be guilty because “I am bad” in society’s eyes. Becoming someone bad means that redemption doesn’t come by fixing the mistake. An apology isn’t enough.
Join Andy Bannister, Gareth Black, and Gavin Matthews from Solas for an exciting open forum / webinar exploring some of the big questions about life, the universe, and God raised by the coronavirus.
A common claim made by various atheists is that they lack dogmatic tendencies and are less biased than someone who is religious, that they only care about evidence, but does this claim stand up to research?
a livestreamed memorial service honoring the life and ministry of Ravi Zacharias
Video: 1 Corinthians 12:1-11 (5/28/20)The reason Zacharias, who died May 19 following a brief battle with cancer, was able to foresee the trends that few others did had to do with his own background as the product of several worlds.
"Every Christian (“to each one”) receives spiritual gifts. A spiritual gift is an ability (“working” or power) that comes to you freely (“gift”) for the purpose of ministering to needs (“service”) so as to build up Christian community in size and depth (“the common good”). This doesn’t mean gifts only meet needs of Christians. They meet needs “in Jesus’ name,” as a witness and sign of the coming kingdom."