And even if they did, Switch's success is already worth more. PS2 was sold for many more years, had no serious competition for many years and had huge price cuts while Switch was stable in price.
You mean that serious competition where all 3 combined didn't even sell one third of the PS2?
You mean that Switch Lite that has to compete with smartphones + tablets + Steamdeck + other handhelds and that still has double the price of the 99 Dollar PS2?
Skimming through the thread, people are too emotionally invested into pieces of plastic.
That veing said, congrats to Switch. Wonky and cheap hardware (at least wth my 3 NSW consoles) with terrific games. And the thing that matters is games, so fully deserved, I guess.
You mean that serious competition where all 3 combined didn't even sell one third of the PS2?
You mean that Switch Lite that has to compete with smartphones + tablets + Steamdeck + other handhelds and that still has double the price of the 99 Dollar PS2?
Correct, 160 million HW and 1537 million SW means an average of 9.6 games per console. This is pretty high and slightly higher than PS1's 9.4 per console.
If one wanted to look at that cynically, for the average European PS2 owner who bought a PS2 when it became affordable and replaced it when PS3 became affordable, that’s basically just every yearly edition of FIFA/PES, plus a Harry Potter game or two thrown in for kids.
This isn’t to shit on the PS2. Just to point out that sales of a product happen in a context. Switch may have benefitted from lockdowns, and PS2 benefitted from other contextual situations. This is why comparing the two in a vacuum of sheer numbers means little, and also why statements like “handheld sells more than home console, hurr durr” should be regarded as way beyond moronic at this point.