Ron holding a beer reminds me that the reason I am not yet asleep could be due to having drank a single beer earlier. Really should have gotten drunk so I'd pass out...
Bethesda first person action games output has been amazing so far.
There's hope yet for Prey 2.
That's funny, because I loved Fury Road (even though my general taste leans towards artsy fartsy stuff, FR has a lot to say about gender construction) and didn't like Force Awakens at all.EDIT: Or maybe it is because I really can't think of any recently released movies I overly enjoyed. Force Awakens > Fury Road though imo, even if Force Awakens was probably less creative
I didn't know bad films could win 6 Oscars.
I didn't know bad films could win 6 Oscars.
Lol where is that space marine little guy found from the OP?
Lol where is that space marine little guy found from the OP?
This is currently one of GAF's most popular inaccuracies. The OT is littered with people seemingly completely unaware who actually developed the last Wolfenstein game.
Second level
There's two of them in each level. You get them to unlock models to look at in a model viewer.
Second level
There's two of them in each level. You get them to unlock models to look at in a model viewer.
Are the animations random? Mine didn't fist bump when I picked it up a few minutes ago on that level.
You review for how it all comes together and whether bad parts are ignorable or not. This isn't a test being scored, it's OK to give a high score even if the MP is mediocre or even something centered around being a graphics showcase (and doesn't cost much I'd think or has something else carrying it) doesn't have good gameplay."Gameplay is bad, but the graphics are good". 9/10?
C'mon man, you know that's not how it works.
I mean, agree to disagree I guess
But you know, no one is going to say they buy uncharted games for the multi-player, but anyone who actually plays them (or the last of us) will come back and tell you that it's pretty solid. And not outsourced. Naughty Dog doesn't just farm out modes wholesale because they cant be bothered to put in the effort.
They realize that the final package in its entirety is going to be a representation of the talent and skills of its studio. They actually care
ID is a shell of its former self, I get that. But still. If you have a vision and that vision is to deliver a great single player campaign then go nuts, and stick to your vision. Don't shit out garbage just to check a box to appease modern gamers
Wolfenstein TNO was released to great acclaim and didn't have multi-player, same with shadow warrior
Because wether I'm looking for multi-player or not, if I buy your product I'm going to judge it by the sum of its parts , not just the parts I enjoyed
Edit: Didn't realize that MachineGames was behind this either. Loved The New Order.
This quote would have more meaning if John Carmack actually made something in the last decade with any relevance. Blips on the map don't count.
One of the best shooters I played in tears tbh.
https://twitter.com/idSoftwareTiago/status/731979907937513472
Was this posted? id software guy noticed this thread. He seems happy.
brutal doom is bad and I'm glad this game isn't like itThe game is fun and addicting - sometimes I get tired of it and quit, but then 15 minutes later I just need more of it.
The gameplay feels good, but not super good. I was expecting it to be like Brutal Doom, but sadly it isn't. Maybe it's just because of full 3D perspective or something, but I've played no modern shooter that would come close to Brutal Doom in "shooting things in the face" category. This Doom is probably closest though.
brutal doom is bad and I'm glad this game isn't like it
in fact one of my biggest fears seeing the stage demo with how slow it looked was that they basically made Brutal Doom HD
Does this work the other way? Can I ignore the good bits so I can trash the game? If a reviewer gave Doom 10/10 overall, with its current mediocre multiplayer, what should the same reviewer give the same game but with a multiplayer mode that was significantly better? The MP is questionable at best. You can't fairly say "The game Doom is still a 10", because if the MP somehow transformed into the greatest MP ever, you're telling me the score shouldn't improve? Doom should be, for example, 8 of ten, because the multiplayer mode still has to have an impact on the overall score, which rates the product as a whole. Once you start cutting bits up and ignoring whole potions of the product, what are actually reviewing? "Uncharted 4 was just terrible and not worth the price. 3/10 (If you ignore the single player campaign)." What?You review for how it all comes together and whether bad parts are ignorable or not. This isn't a test being scored, it's OK to give a high score even if the MP is mediocre or even something centered around being a graphics showcase (and doesn't cost much I'd think or has something else carrying it) doesn't have good gameplay.
I've read a few reviews and they've all finished the game under 10 hours. I'm just over half way and I'm already past 10 hours. Are these guys just blasting (pun intended) their way through it without looking or something? Anyway, I still think this game is the best shooter I've played in years. I personally didn't think too much of Wolfenstein (solid, but that's it), but before that I think Bulletstorm or Halo Reach are the only ones that were fun to me. Oh and Serious Sam 3, that game kicks ass.
Apparrently it's really hard to do proper fps campaigns. Except it isn't, because all you need to do is not make "checklist the game" and just ignore contemporary audiences.
https://twitter.com/idSoftwareTiago/status/731979907937513472
Was this posted? id software guy noticed this thread. He seems happy.
I too cried when I saw the greatness
![]()
IGN
- IN PROGRESS
- Current score at 7.1