I just went GMG with their 20 percent off special.
Thanks for the headsup
store.steampowered.com
I obviously was looking for a discount.
I just went GMG with their 20 percent off special.
store.steampowered.com
Seems like you are, so instead of drive by shitposting try to elaborate why?
Instead of feeling like I was in hell or hell was on Earth, I felt like I was on Mars.
Our review is here: http://nextgengamingblog.com/blog/doom-review/
9/10, our guy loved the single player, and we were left scratching our heads as to the lack of early code for everyone, as this is brilliant!
Well it looks like id/Bethesda made the right choice, SP is brilliant but the MP seems to drag the score down. Word of mouth is basically selling the game right now before the reviews hit.
There is a 7.1 from ign and a 50 from some other site, I mean it's not too bad but word of mouth probably got this game a decent chunk of salesBut the reviews are hitting and they're almost universally positive...
store.steampowered.com
Shadow Warrior and Bullet StormI can think of only ONE game comparable to Doom and thats FEAR, everything else is just filler.
Any score below 8 should be ridiculed and the site should be banned from now on.
As opposed to shooting until they drop? Isn't that giving you more choice than standard FPS?Shoot until a blue outline shows up then execute.
Shadow Warrior and Bullet Storm![]()
There is a 7.1 from ign and a 50 from some other site, I mean it's not too bad but word of mouth probably got this game a decent chunk of sales
Umm....
Is that Polygon quote about the control scheme for real? I can't access the review at work, but I'm assuming that's not real...
It can't be real...right??
Are you sure you're using holistic correctly? The definition itself says it's a view of the whole as opposed to the individual parts--and if those individual parts contribute to the whole being damaged it impacts the whole itself.
Thinking about buying the season pass to support the game more. I don't want bullshit reviews leading to poor income for this game![]()
IGN used to be a good gaming reviews site many many years ago (around when the N64 came out) now it's just ridiculous, that score is actually insulting.
As opposed to shooting until they drop? Isn't that giving you more choice than standard FPS?
I disagree with IGN's review, but again, that's just one person's opinion. People put too much weight into these scores, they're arbitrary at best.
I disagree with IGN's review, but again, that's just one person's opinion. People put too much weight into these scores, they're arbitrary at best.
I don't want to see this game get anything less than a 10. That being said, since multiplayer is there, someone might buy the game for the multiplayer. In that sense, I think it's fair to bake an assessment of the multiplayer into the game's overall score.My use is correct; holistic, viewing each part only as it relates to the whole, not in isolation. Doom's multiplayer is harmless, at worst without merit but not detracting from the core of the game. There's no purpose in holding it against the final score, unless one feels compelled to equally weight all aspects of a game - which is mechanical, arbitrary, and foolish.
Thinking about buying the season pass to support the game more. I don't want bullshit reviews leading to poor income for this game![]()
Keep in mind that the original Doom received similar complaints from some of the critics. For example, EDGE magazine gave the original Doom a 7/10, saying it was just "kill, kill, kill".
from the article said:lf only you could talk to these creatures, then perhaps you could try and make friends with them, form alliances… Now, that would be interesting.
My use is correct; holistic, viewing each part only as it relates to the whole, not in isolation. Doom's multiplayer is harmless, at worst without merit but not detracting from the core of the game. There's no purpose in holding it against the final score, unless one feels compelled to equally weight all aspects of a game - which is mechanical, arbitrary, and foolish.
Again, I point at Might No. 9 as an example of how removing certain features can be a good thing. The multiplayer aspect of the game may be good... but is it going to be so good that it makes up for the ruined good-will Inafune generated? I'm not entirely certain; But I do think many fans would be happier without a multiplayer component as it led to a massive delay several times.I do share your concern that penalizing a great single-player game for a bonus multiplayer mode is poor incentive for devs to include such extras.
The game is damn good. I'm having a blast playing this right now.
Why Bethesda had no confidence in it whatsoever ?
The multiplayer mode isn't bad. Like, it functions.
But it's just not interesting. It's like drinking skim milk at a Christmas party after finishing a cup of egg nog.
Eh, to each their own. I love the MP. There is nothing else like it on the market right now.
I don't care about review scores but those scores affect sales.
Come on what? 7.1? It's insulting, especially when IGN gave COD ghosts an 8.8.
People say this a lot, with nothing to back it up. A good game will sell on word of mouth alone.
Come on what? 7.1? It's insulting, especially when IGN gave COD ghosts an 8.8.
The vast majority of good games don't sell much, word of mouth or otherwise.
Come on what? 7.1? It's insulting, especially when IGN gave COD ghosts an 8.8.