Mr. Luchador
Member
Raide, that was my issue in BETA, but I put it down to being the BETA and perhaps they'd add 'hand holding' in for release. I take it its exactly the same for release? data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Frown :( :("
zlatko said:This is the best thread on Gaf since the Woody action figure one. :lol
Londa I got a question for you. It's a two parter:
1) What are your 5 favorite things about FFXIV?
2) What are your 5 most hated things about FFXIV ?
It's really hard for me to find fun/enjoyment out of the game, so I was hoping I could see a bit of a comparison of what it is that bugs you the most, but is being over ridden by what exactly ?
Londa said:I already said why I like the game before. If you dislike this game, fine, I respect your opinion. But that doest mean I have to explain or defend why I like it to you. Imo, you deserve no explanation from me.
No, many games forces the player to constantly think on their feet and improvise, so repeating the exact same thing for each fight won't work. There are some games where you can get away by just spamming one powerful attack over and over, and that'll work for the entire game, but that's just bad game design. To be honest, I never got to highend level play in WoW, but from what I've played (up to lvl 30 or something I think) and saw of other players, it was just repeating the same skills no matter the enemies I fought. It very quickly stopped being fun.speedpop said:Isn't that pretty much the norm when it comes to any sense of gaming where there is action involved? You connect with an enemy, you cycle through abilities and certain combination/s of mapped buttons, the enemy dies and you move on to the next one. Of course there may be differing situations to an enemy that force you to change strategy.
Just because WoW, heck most MMOs in general, are a tad more "static" doesn't mean that they should be thrust into the depths of mediocre repetition when you could say the same thing toward a game created by Capcom or any other developer who has built a reputation upon A-grade action games. There comes a point in all games where repetition and mindless gameplay become one and you stop playing.
The core combat mechanics are more fun. And in my opinion, it's the very core mechanics of a game which are the most important thing. You can have the most amazing world and quest design, but what's the point when combat isn't fun? Combat is what you spend 90% of the time on in any RPG afterall.Zefah said:You've got to be joking.
WoW would be fucking amazing if they released it as a party-based single player RPG. Let the player build up his or her own party, add in a pause function and tune all of the content accordingly and you would have just about the best dungeon crawler and RPG in history.
Also, I've played Vindictus, but just exactly how is it better than WoW? It's a spammy action game. It's fun, and sure, it feels a bit more involved than WoW, but the range of abilities, party combinations and enemy types gives WoW a ton more depth.
Sectus said:No, many games forces the player to constantly think on their feet and improvise, so repeating the exact same thing for each fight won't work. There are some games where you can get away by just spamming one powerful attack over and over, and that'll work for the entire game, but that's just bad game design. To be honest, I never got to highend level play in WoW, but from what I've played (up to lvl 30 or something I think) and saw of other players, it was just repeating the same skills no matter the enemies I fought. It very quickly stopped being fun.
Even a good game like GW suffers from the same thing. In that game you can have some more fun building up a unique skillbar, and depending on the skillbar you might have to make some tactical decisions based on who you fight, but even then the execution is so mindless and the enemies are not all that varied that it doesn't take long for you to memorize the few skill combinations you use to kill various enemies.
The core combat mechanics are more fun. And in my opinion, it's the very core mechanics of a game which are the most important thing. You can have the most amazing world and quest design, but what's the point when combat isn't fun? Combat is what you spend 90% of the time on in any RPG afterall.
I'm probably very biased as I'm sick tired of most standards in MMOs, and Vindictus just happens to address all my concerns: it has very few timesinks, combat is very varied and fun (sure, you CAN get away with spamming attacks if you're in a big party, but chances are you'll be much more reliant on healing/ressing. Try playing alone on a higher difficulty, you'll start to appreciate more all the attacks and evades you can do), it has no "holy trinity of classes", there's no annoying ganking, no waiting for mobs to respawn, and it's the most challenging of any online RPG I've ever played.
Okay okay, I have technically experienced some more challenging quests in GW, but the cause of that has always been someone in the party fucking up and you have no chance of beating a huge boss/mob because your tank or healer messed up.
And note that I'm not saying Vindictus is a perfect game (it has some problems like level design and difficulty balance in first episode being rather weak, and the payment system is downright awful). But in my opinion, this is the direction MMOs should go in.
Stumpokapow said:Frankly if you're not interested in professional reviews and you don't think anyone deserves an explanation of why you feel differently than anyone else on this issue, I'm not sure how you're participating in this thread at all.
zlatko said:Come on now you don't need to TRY World of Warcraft to get it. Londa means you need to TRY only games SHE likes, because the rest don't matter. :lol
You forgot Vanguard.Alex said:Only AO could possibly compete with badness...
Zalasta said:Internet at its finest. In this thread a bunch of people bashing a game they have either no interest in playing, or have played little to none of it. I applaud you all for beating dead horses like copy/pasting environments over and over again. It's really strange how people will just latch on something and never let go.
Londa said:to you, yes, but there are others that disagree.
@IGN review
I don't listen to reviews at all. I also don't believe IGN to be a good source for information. I've stop going to that site for years.
Londa said:I have already said, I disagree with the reviews because they have misinformation in them. The poster asked why I like FFXIV, not why I don't accept the reviews. This same poster came off as a prick to me earlier, and already seems to have made up his opinion of me. Case in point:
explaining anything to this poster is a waste of time when he is already putting words in my mouth that I haven't said.
Zalasta said:Internet at its finest. In this thread a bunch of people bashing a game they have either no interest in playing, or have played little to none of it. I applaud you all for beating dead horses like copy/pasting environments over and over again. It's really strange how people will just latch on something and never let go.
duckroll said:And your contribution to this thread is...?
Zalasta said:Apparently nothing, because it seems you either have to defend FFXIV or bash it to make any contributions. You know what though, I actually play the game, so any grievances I may have with it is backed up by experiences. How about you? Or are you like some of the people here that are just here for a show and piss on it with a mob mentality?
Zalasta said:Apparently nothing, because it seems you either have to defend FFXIV or bash it to make any contributions. You know what though, I actually play the game, so any grievances I may have with it is backed up by experiences. How about you? Or are you like some of the people here that are just here for a show and piss on it with a mob mentality?
Zalasta said:Apparently nothing, because it seems you either have to defend FFXIV or bash it to make any contributions. You know what though, I actually play the game, so any grievances I may have with it is backed up by experiences. How about you? Or are you like some of the people here that are just here for a show and piss on it with a mob mentality?
Sent said:The review scores are bad for a reason, even if you like 14 you have to admit it isn't up to par. (Yes I've played it)
The review scores ares 4s and not 6s/7s because they say even the core systems (battle, armory, leve, crafting) are dull or broken or both.Khrno said:You are right, 14 isn't up to par yet. But it doesn't need a Cataclysm type of fix, just some more patches to bring it up to par after fixing the current issues and adding the missing features, because the game at its core (battle, armory, leve, crafting systems) is good.
Khrno said:You are right, 14 isn't up to par yet. But it doesn't need a Cataclysm type of fix, just some more patches to bring it up to par after fixing the current issues and adding the missing features, because the game at its core (battle, armory, leve, crafting systems) is good.
DaBuddaDa said:The review scores ares 4s and not 6s/7s because they say even the core systems (battle, armory, leve, crafting) are dull or broken or both.
DaBuddaDa said:The review scores ares 4s and not 6s/7s because they say even the core systems (battle, armory, leve, crafting) are dull or broken or both.
As you said this is SE only thing players should expect to be fixed is exploits, stuff like actually tuning the game isn't high on SE's priority list.JudgeN said:I disagree, all the cosmetic problems bring the core mechanics down a lot. It's just frustrating to do some stuff because basic shit is missing/broken.
Examples would make the game more accessible:
AH
item sort
Damage icon that shows up in your inventory on the item that is damaged
adjustment to degradation (right now some weapons will be damage after only hour or so of exp)
Check box sell system (so you can sell all your items in one big group instead of individually)
ARROW QUIVERS *shakes fist*
Keyboard shortcuts instead of having to go to main menu
Adjustment in Skill point gains for mages
Recipe book
Just this small list would go a long way into improving the game overall experience. Now sure if you think the world is boring, its probably not going to make the game good for ya. But after the backlash I would hope SE would rework and individualize all the areas they haven't released yet to give them more "life".
Then again this is SE we are talking about, so the likelihood of getting a lot of stuff fixed is somewhat slim.
Velion said:As you said this is SE only thing players should expect to be fixed is exploits, stuff like actually tuning the game isn't high on SE's priority list.
I've been playing the game a ton. Everything is dull. Combat is broken in the areas of SP rewards and battle regimens, at the very least.Khrno said:Fucking hell, you again taking opinions into facts? So am I supposed to get someone else opinion as my own now, or what?
Go play the game first and make your own opinion and see if those systems are indeed dull and broken or not.
Londa said:does your friend know a friend that knows a friend who's dad works for SE?
You are so cute :lolKhrno said:Fucking hell, you again taking opinions into facts? So am I supposed to get someone else opinion as my own now, or what?
Go play the game first and make your own opinion and see if those systems are indeed dull and broken or not.
God you are so obtuse. There is such a thing as "precedent".Londa said:does your friend know a friend that knows a friend who's dad works for SE?
DaBuddaDa said:This is a thread discussing reviews of the game. I am relaying what the reviews say.
Nothing in that review sounds different from the release version of the game.Khrno said:Oh yeah sorry, let's keep discussing all the lies told on that GS review, maybe they should have used the launch build and not the beta build to do their review. At least the IGN review does not forgets to mention that the good points, yeah some are those that I mentioned, are held back because of the server and ui problems.
Is that better now?
They're just frustrated that most people don't agree their game is any good. Also, see here and here.Mr. Snrub said:Why are some people taking the stank-nasty reviews so personally? When 5 major gaming organizations give the game average/bad reviews...it's probably not that great.
Don't get pissed because people are reading the reviews and thinking, "Okay, this game PROBABLY sucks." Reviews are there so we can decide to NOT waste our money.
Mr. Snrub said:Why are some people taking the stank-nasty reviews so personally? When 5 major gaming organizations give the game average/bad reviews...it's probably not that great.
Don't get pissed because people are reading the reviews and thinking, "Okay, this game PROBABLY sucks." Reviews are there so we can decide to NOT waste our money.
Mister Zimbu said:
- "Beta 3 will have a ton more content and a ton more fixes than Beta 2 did!" (it didn't)
RocketDarkness said:Nothing in that review sounds different from the release version of the game.
Forbiden said:I'm not exactly sure if it's defined as "more content", but didn't Beta 3 allow you to start in Ul'dah and Gridania as opposed to locking you down in Limsa? At least to me that counts as "more content", although I wouldn't exactly call it "a ton"
notworksafe said:Still spouting garbage, FF fans? I love this thread...every day I can come in here and see what it's like to live life in a delusional state.
And Londa, still waiting on proof for any claim you've made in this thread.
They gave it the finger. Seriously.
do you have a DA/LJ account, and/or do you frequent anime cons, and/or do you Cosplay?
Londa said:If that isn't a professional way of reviewing, then I don't know what is!
As to be expected. FF fans are predisposed to making wild claims on the internet. I'd back that up with proof, but you guys all have access to GameFAQs so you can do it.Londa said:uh huh, I've already moved on from this. Have fun waiting for nothing. :lol
While no one can say that FFXIV is an entirely negative experience, you wouldnt be too far off the mark to say that, at least, at the moment. It still has a lot of growing to do, and I honestly believe that the PS3 release next year will be more in line with what should have been the initial release. Even as a devout fan of the series, I cant recommend this game until a lot of fixes have been put in place. The actual world of FFXIV is lush and beautiful. Its just a shame that your only means to explore it is with a clunky by-product of stubborn Japanese design.
You want a website called "cheapassgamer" to be professional?Londa said:uh huh, I've already moved on from this. Have fun waiting for nothing. :lol
If that isn't a professional way of reviewing, then I don't know what is!
What, the.... :lol
Dance In My Blood said:You want a website called "cheapassgamer" to be professional?
You're an ass too. :lolLonda said:Hey, I'm cheap, and I play games.
notworksafe said:You're an ass too. :lol
Only partially true, but I couldn't pass it up