Noshino said:Why? Because the previous scoring system was more broken than this one, naming just one game with the 1-to-10 system gave a SINGLE game 10 freaking points
I think it's good that this one doesn't make you order everything. You can now name several games that you enjoyed as much as each other.Mar_ said:I'd vote in it.
Not that I'm adverse to changing systems. I just need to know why it's changing. I'd like a clear explanation of why this system makes it better.
Shurs said:In the previous system you were required to list a minimum of three games.
I liked the old system better because it gave exposure to more games.
Noshino said:1- MGS4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9-Halo 3
10-Uncharted
the difference in points between the first and second place is 8 points, that is a big difference, quite a bunch of points that was being taken advantage of.
Shurs said:In the previous system you were required to list a minimum of three games.
I liked the old system better because it gave exposure to more games.
Shurs said:Sure, if someone chose to vote like that, on the other hand, if someone listed 1,2,3 the difference between first and second place is one point. It's all relative.
Noshino said:The thing is, you don't have that problem with the new system.
You can post whatever you like though. You can post 40 games, in the order you prefer, then just assign points as and where you see fit. I agree it's not as good as last year, but I don't see your point as an issue.Shurs said:But a new problem arises.
I've played well over twenty games this year. I want to give exposure to ten of those games, as I feel that ten bring something to the table that is worth mentioning. Now, in order to get ten games on the list, I have to pretend that I have no preference between the ten games and give them all one point. That's lame.
stuburns said:You can post whatever you like though. You can post 40 games, in the order you prefer, then just assign points as and where you see fit. I agree it's not as good as last year, but I don't see your point as an issue.
Lostconfused said:I guess I am one of the few people that's happy about not having to mention 10 more games that everyone else already did.
Well I guess that's my problem but I would end up listing those games anyways. Because they were pretty good. This point system made me think about which ones I had more fun with this year rather than just listing an ok AAA game.Shurs said:Using the old system, you never needed to list ten games. You could list ten games, but you could also list three.
I believe we're saying the same thingNoshino said:It isn't. Now the max score per game is 3, making votes count less per person. Meaning that niche games, which will be less voted for, are likely to have less points.
[...]
Why? Because the previous scoring system was more broken than this one, naming just one game with the 1-to-10 system gave a SINGLE game 10 freaking points
at this point it'd be like giving Madden 10 GOTY...Shurs said:Why?
I for one like the point system; it encourages variety.Lostconfused said:Well I guess that's my problem but I would end up listing those games anyways. Because they were pretty good. This point system made me think about which ones I had more fun with this year rather than just listing an ok AAA game.
HiResDes said:at this point it'd be like giving Madden 10 GOTY...
Shurs said:Sure, I can post 40 games, but I only have 10 points to disperse. In order to get 10 games onto the GOTY master list, I have to give an equal point to every game, and that is where the problem lies.
Did you read the "IMO", who are you to say how I form my opinion?Shurs said:If that is someone's favorite game of the year, who are you to say that it is less deserving than your pick?
Jocchan said:I believe we're saying the same thing
I said this system isn't perfect, it still has its flaws, but it's leagues better than the one from last thread, where people would just give Console Exclusive #1 and Console Exclusive #2 five points each and call it a day At least now people willing to spend all of their points (most, so far) will have to name at least five games.
It's true that this gives less power to a single user, but that's exactly the point: a single user being able to give Game A five times the points of Game B creates an extreme unbalance between the 3-4 top tier games that came out this year and everything else. With the current system, this unbalance is strongly reduced.
HiResDes said:Did you read the "IMO", who are you to say how I form my opinion?
touche:lolShurs said:It is my opinion, that your opinion makes you sound like a douche bag.
Better being a douchebag than listing MW2 as the best game of 2009!Shurs said:It is my opinion, that your opinion makes you sound like a douche bag.
Haunted said:Better being a douchebag than listing MW2 as the best game of 2009!