How long is going to take for you to shake some words out of your mouth?Stoney Mason said:
Rez said:no, it doesn't. it makes the list much more interesting and diverse.
what we need is someone like evilore to step in and give the final word.
Lostconfused said:How many people actually looked past the top 10 or even 20 games? If some one is going to go through a list of 100 why not just make a thread for a game. People are open to discussing niche titles and its going to tell you more about the game then a spot in a massive list of games.
Lostconfused said:How long is going to take for you to shake some words out of your mouth?
Hopefully it'd involve banning every form of best of list ever.Rez said:no, it doesn't. it makes the list much more interesting and diverse.
what we need is someone like evilore to step in and give the final word.
And that's not even entirely true either. There are already multitudes of various games nominated, and now that people have to stretch their games, they will obviously vote for either the ones they think should win, or the ones that are near and dear to their hearts this year.BenjaminBirdie said:It's a yearbook of the games we played. This system is like only allowing the Honor's kids to get their picture taken.
Ok then tell me which one I should have used for yours?Stoney Mason said:Silly posts only deserve internet acronymns as responses.
Stoney Mason said:Silly posts only deserve internet acronymns as responses.
The other lists are going to have miniscule sample sizes. Has ONE racing game been mentioned yet in this thread?Maxrpg said:And that's not even entirely true either. There are already multitudes of various games nominated, and now that people have to stretch their games, they will obviously vote for either the ones they think should win, or the ones that are near and dear to their hearts this year.
Meaning, this year will see different results than previous, which has the intended effect. Sure some games will be top heavy, but it means after those games (which we KNEW were going to be there) the other lists will be quite interesting to see.
What "other games"? Everyone is just voting for the same 20 or so games. In terms of diversity and varity, the old system obliterates the new one.Maxrpg said:And that's not even entirely true either. There are already multitudes of various games nominated, and now that people have to stretch their games, they will obviously vote for either the ones they think should win, or the ones that are near and dear to their hearts this year.
Meaning, this year will see different results than previous, which has the intended effect. Sure some games will be top heavy, but it means after those games (which we KNEW were going to be there) the other lists will be quite interesting to see.
Maxrpg said:And that's not even entirely true either. There are already multitudes of various games nominated, and now that people have to stretch their games, they will obviously vote for either the ones they think should win, or the ones that are near and dear to their hearts this year.
Meaning, this year will see different results than previous, which has the intended effect. Sure some games will be top heavy, but it means after those games (which we KNEW were going to be there) the other lists will be quite interesting to see.
You really think NONE will be mentioned? Think about it for a second. It's a "Game of the Year" list. Not a "every game that came out this year sorted into lists" list.Grayman said:The other lists are going to have miniscule sample sizes. Has ONE racing game been mentioned yet in this thread?
BenjaminBirdie said:Sorry, but no matter how you slice it, this method is eliminating games from mention. Whether or not you're cool with that is of course up to you. Sure there are a multitude of games already mentioned, hundreds of people voted already. My point is only that in the old system there would have been even more.
Those games will still be there this year.swoon said:yea i haven't followed the whole debate, but this is very true and it's mind boggling that someone would argue with it. people's top 3-4 games will be the same because those games are the "best" are at least appeal to the most people, then next 16 or so games on peoples lists are were all the excitement happens and where i know i find the gems i've missed.
Actually the previous years' threads were purposely called "GAF Games o' the Year". Its only this year that we've apparently ditched that idea.Maxrpg said:You really think NONE will be mentioned? Think about it for a second. It's a "Game of the Year" list. Not a "every game that came out this year sorted into lists" list.
If the lists are short, it's because the games weren't foremost in a certain person's thoughts to make it into their list. Meaning, they weren't thought of in the terms of a Game of the Year.
You say diverse but you actually mean different.And yes it won't be as diverse as before, but it will still be interesting that it will be diverse from LAST year's list.
swoon said:yea i haven't followed the whole debate, but this is very true and it's mind boggling that someone would argue with it. people's top 3-4 games will be the same because those games are the "best" are at least appeal to the most people, then next 16 or so games on peoples lists are were all the excitement happens and where i know i find the gems i've missed.
Eric Hall said:Three:
Uncharted 2
Beatles: Rock Band
One:
Batman: Arkham Asylum
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2
UFC Undisputed 2009
Shadow Complex
Yup its totally worth it. If the game got cut, odds are its not worth talking about.BenjaminBirdie said:Yes, exactly! I do not understand at all how people are against this. Sure it might even out console warrioring and now what might have been #1 last year will be like #3 this year. Is that really worth cutting off probably like a hundred or more games from at least getting a mention?
No they won't. Or at least they certainly won't be representative of gaf's collective opinion of them. Any game that appears outside of the top 10 in this system will do so because they "lost" the game of the year position or because they are outliers. You can't get a reliable 11-20+ list if everyone is just voting for 2-5 games and putting their "points" disproportionally into that.Lostconfused said:Those games will still be there this year.
smh.Lostconfused said:Yup its totally worth it. If the game got cut, odds are its not worth talking about.
Lostconfused said:Yup its totally worth it. If the game got cut, odds are its not worth talking about.
Lostconfused said:Yup its totally worth it. If the game got cut, odds are its not worth talking about.
Games that are not worth talking about according to Lostconfused:Lostconfused said:Yup its totally worth it. If the game got cut, odds are its not worth talking about.
Ok well we are getting into two separate arguments here. You are arguing for a list of games that are most popular proportional to their sales. Which is not quiet the same to a niche title that was really popular with its audience.grandjedi6 said:No they won't. Or at least they certainly won't be representative of gaf's collective opinion of them. Any game that appears outside of the top 10 in this system will do so because they "lost" the game of the year position or because they are outliers. You can't get a reliable 11-20+ list if everyone is just voting for 2-5 games and putting their "points" disproportionally into that.
This is gaf, even the most niche titles will get a mention. Games that will get probably never even got mentioned in the official forums once.BenjaminBirdie said:What??
Sorry but, in all seriousness, is this the "spirit" that GAF is trying to put forth in deciding their Game Of The Year? And, yeah, wasn't it GameS of the Year anyway?
I'm sticking by my Yearbook analogy. This is like all the Lisas getting kicked out of her own Retrospeciticus.
In reference to the game of the year thread? Yes.KilgoreTrout said:You here it here first, if a game isn't GOTY material, it's not worth talking about.
What? How the hell am I arguing that?Lostconfused said:Ok well we are getting into two separate arguments here. You are arguing for a list of games that are most popular proportional to their sales. Which is not quiet the same to a niche title that was really popular with its audience.
grandjedi6 said:Games that are not worth talking about according to Lostconfused:
11. Valkyria Chronicles - 1308
12. Burnout Paradise - 1203
13. Rock Band 2 - 1032
14. Mirror's Edge - 1010
15. Wipeout HD - 932
16. Persona 4 - 924
17. No More Heroes - 871
18. Resistance 2 - 807
19. World of Goo - 699
20. The World Ends With You - 698
21. Professor Layton and the Curious Village - 663
22. Mario Kart Wii - 653
23. Mega Man 9 - 632
24. Banjo-Kazooie: Nuts & Bolts - 606
25. Castlevania: Order of Ecclesia - 535
26. Motorstorm: Pacific Rift - 533
27. Lost Odyssey - 475
28. Devil May Cry 4 - 473
29. Super Street Fighter II Turbo: HD Remix - 464
30. Mother 3 (Eng) - 452
31. Prince of Persia - 433
32. World of Warcraft: Wrath of the Lich King - 427
33. Chrono Trigger DS - 415
34. Geometry Wars: Retro Evolved 2 - 414
35. Bionic Commando: Rearmed - 394
36. PixelJunk Monsters - 363
37. Final Fantasy VII: Crisis Core - 362
38. Ninja Gaiden II - 347
39. Tales of Vesperia - 337
40. Saints Row 2 - 323
Obviously I can go on but I think I made my point
grandjedi6 said:Games that are not worth talking about according to Lostconfused:
11. Valkyria Chronicles - 1308
12. Burnout Paradise - 1203
13. Rock Band 2 - 1032
14. Mirror's Edge - 1010
15. Wipeout HD - 932
16. Persona 4 - 924
17. No More Heroes - 871
18. Resistance 2 - 807
19. World of Goo - 699
20. The World Ends With You - 698
21. Professor Layton and the Curious Village - 663
22. Mario Kart Wii - 653
23. Mega Man 9 - 632
24. Banjo-Kazooie: Nuts & Bolts - 606
25. Castlevania: Order of Ecclesia - 535
26. Motorstorm: Pacific Rift - 533
27. Lost Odyssey - 475
28. Devil May Cry 4 - 473
29. Super Street Fighter II Turbo: HD Remix - 464
30. Mother 3 (Eng) - 452
31. Prince of Persia - 433
32. World of Warcraft: Wrath of the Lich King - 427
33. Chrono Trigger DS - 415
34. Geometry Wars: Retro Evolved 2 - 414
35. Bionic Commando: Rearmed - 394
36. PixelJunk Monsters - 363
37. Final Fantasy VII: Crisis Core - 362
38. Ninja Gaiden II - 347
39. Tales of Vesperia - 337
40. Saints Row 2 - 323
Obviously I can go on but I think I made my point
Because the larger the list the more games mentioned and the game that has reached the widest audience will still get a large number of votes even if they are all 1 which would probably rank it above some die hard niche title that very few people awarded high scores.grandjedi6 said:What? How the hell am I arguing that?
Lostconfused said:Ok well we are getting into two separate arguments here. You are arguing for a list of games that are most popular proportional to their sales. Which is not quiet the same to a niche title that was really popular with its audience.
This is gaf, even the most niche titles will get a mention. Games that will get probably never even got mentioned in the official forums once.