I just watched the video review. Why the hell does Dan Casserole always, ALWAYS want online leaderboards in all his games? Seriously. The guy would want them implemented in Harvest Moon next, I bet.
Why on earth would anyone want a brawler to be any more than 6 or so hours? These kinds of games are very repetitive in nature - you don't want it to be 15+ hours long.
There's not much to defend about the game.
How about this: It has nice cutscenes?
*shrug*
Anyways, nice 1up score. No stores in my area had the game yet today, probably still in shipping phase. I wish the games industry would switch to a release date model like every other media form.
I recently beat No More Heroes and I am currently punching my way through God Hand. If it's as long as those, which get praised fairly often, who cares? This game looks like a carbon copy of NMH with a decent level of polish and more variety in the gameplay.
Beat-em-ups have always been like this. Short bursts of bloody excess that would get stale if they tried to stick in filler content. I don't even put DMC and Ninja Gaiden in the same genre, those games have too much platforming/puzzle bullshit.
An A- from 1up! The game must suck for being so damn short to get that minus! I heard RE5 is only half the length of RE4 as well. Another suck game I must troll in it's review topic. Quickly trolls to the hydrofoil!
I like how reviewers are stating that this is finally a mature/core game for the kiddie Wii console, as if Resident Evil, Call of Duty, Manhunt, Medal of Honor, Disaster etc. etc. etc. don't exist.
Gaming journalists :lol
Coolio McAwesome said:
MadWorld is a third-party exclusive for the Wii that's aimed at "hardcore" gamers and is getting excellent reviews. I should have known that this thread would be full of hate.
A lot of people in this thread are acting as though the resolution a game runs at is more important than its gameplay or overall design. Others are debating the length of the game without taking the genre and replay value into consideration. And, naturally, you have the usual "Wii games shouldn't be full price" comments thrown in for good measure. I'm not suggesting that the game doesn't have any flaws, but I find it hilarious how a game can get a 9.0 and people still feel the need to shine a spotlight on negative aspects about the game. IGN's review of the game was overwhelmingly positive. Why is this thread so negative?
The NPD's have been talking for months, if you want we can start listing the examples because they go back as far as December 2007 with Lego Star Wars (which stills showed up an entire December later)
Guy you quoted: "NMH IS A CRAPPY EXAMPLE OF A WII GAME THAT DID POORLY!"
You: "WELL THEN SHOW ME A GOOD EXAMPLE OF A WII GAME THAT DID POORLY. I CAN'T THINK OF ONE."
See what I mean. That's what I mean. I could list stuff, but then you'd look like a moron and you wouldn't like that.