Relaxed Muscle
Member
We know if this game has a fake ending? Then could it be more than 6 hours.
Captain Chaos said:IGN like or not is a huge videogaming website, read by millions of people every day and owned by Rupert Murdoch. You think some piss ant reviewer wasnt told what to score?
There's millions of dollars at stake.
Stumpokapow said:IGN wasn't the lowest score or the lowest major publication score on Wii Music and I'm not sure what's so hard to believe about the idea that they actually deeply disliked the game.
Ahh, I see. Then we can't take IGN seriously, at least if it's run in the same fashion as Fox News.Captain Chaos said:IGN like or not is a huge videogaming website, read by millions of people every day and owned by Rupert Murdoch. You think some piss ant reviewer wasnt told what to score?
There's millions of dollars at stake.
Blimblim said:It more than likely means the game runs at 60 fps and uses field rendering. Basically it runs at at 720x240 resolution, and then interlaces the fields to recreate a full resolution image. Many early PS2 titles did this.
480p would require to use full resolution framebuffers, and so use twice more VRAM.
You're delusional.Captain Chaos said:IGN like or not is a huge videogaming website, read by millions of people every day and owned by Rupert Murdoch. You think some piss ant reviewer wasnt told what to score?
There's millions of dollars at stake.
Link Man said:Ahh, I see. Then we can't take IGN seriously, at least if it's run in the same fashion as Fox News.
JJConrad said:This review reminds me of Matt's DK64 review. It was a cause, not a critique.
I'm also torn between my support for Platnium and my disgust for IGN (mostly Matt). My only real interest in this game is due to who made it, but I can't let Matt assume any credit for the game's success. (Not that it'll have much... its a new IP in a dead genre). I now feel obligated to buy Sonic and the Black Night before I can buy this.![]()
Vagabundo said:Jesus GAF, what the hell are yous arguing about?
It's like someone let a bag of ferrets lose in a sweet shop.
This actually look slike alot of fun, unlike NMH.
Rez said:You're delusional.
Fixed for accuracy.AceBandage said:Obviously, since a mature Wii game got a great score, there must be some conspiracy behind it.
Captain Chaos said:back yourself up, why am I?
Captain Chaos said:People guess what? Nintendo, Microsoft and Sony are all great.
Captain Chaos said:IGN like or not is a huge videogaming website, read by millions of people every day and owned by Rupert Murdoch. You think some piss ant reviewer wasnt told what to score?
There's millions of dollars at stake.
I think a large majority of NMH's owners would disagree with you on that.Tain said:No More Heroes looks plenty of fun. Not when you play it, though.
Rez said:This 480i/p bullshit is annoying. After 10 minutes of playing most people with neither notice nor care.
AceBandage said:Technically, since you made the baseless accusation of Rupert saying what score Madworld should get, the burden of proof is on you.
Amir0x said:Why would they stop noticing OR caring? It is EXTREMELY distracting on any decent television, a massive difference. If it made a difference from someone from the start (and that's up to the individual), it's not going to stop mattering later. It's particularly frustrating because these games look so atrocious on my HDTV I have to unplug and dig out the old SDTV piece of shit just to stand it.
I'm going to do it because MAD WORLD will still be rad, but it's still a big legitimate issue. Don't make claims about how people will notice the issue or not.
Ulairi said:You're nuts. I've written for IGN, I've published reviews for IGN. I never once had anyone tell me how to review a game or what I could or couldn't say. Take off the tin-foil hat.
Stumpokapow said:IGN wasn't the lowest score or the lowest major publication score on Wii Music and I'm not sure what's so hard to believe about the idea that they actually deeply disliked the game.
So, basically most displays out there then.dark10x said:Oh, come on, 480p doesn't make a significant difference unless your display does a poor job de-interlacing.
Thanks for the real answer, I wonder if this is so.Blimblim said:It more than likely means the game runs at 60 fps and uses field rendering. Basically it runs at at 720x240 resolution, and then interlaces the fields to recreate a full resolution image. Many early PS2 titles did this.
480p would require to use full resolution framebuffers, and so use twice more VRAM.
Yes, they didn't get Wii Music.Model 500 said:Just a side note, no, it's not hard to "believe" considering that they didn't even have a clue what the game was all about
Captain Chaos said:hmmmm, <bites lip>
see me at E3 and I'll let you in on the moneyhatting inside of the videogame industry.
:lol :lolAceBandage said:We all know about Lamespot's money hatting, but I have a hard time believing this happens in the majority of review journals.
And especially in one like IGN, where they rate quite a few "hardcore" games lower than other sites.
Amir0x said:But this is a Mad World topic, so let's keep it on topic.
Gino said:NMH's was awesome even though it had flaws. Just like Killer 7 was awesome with it's flaws.
Amir0x said:Yes, they didn't get Wii Music.
I thought you Wii Music fans stopped being embarrassing fantards ages ago, I guess not. But this is a Mad World topic, so let's keep it on topic.
But this is a Mad World topic, so let's keep it on topic.
See, I was under the assumption that most would be playing it on an SDTV. My bad.Amir0x said:Why would they stop noticing OR caring? It is EXTREMELY distracting on any decent television, a massive difference. If it made a difference from someone from the start (and that's up to the individual), it's not going to stop mattering later. It's particularly frustrating because these games look so atrocious on my HDTV I have to unplug and dig out the old SDTV piece of shit just to stand it.
I'm going to do it because MAD WORLD will still be rad, but it's still a big legitimate issue. Don't make claims about how people will notice the issue or not.
Model 500 said:Hahaha, what a joke! Yeah, they didn't, and the proof is all around the Official Thread. Remember what happened in our PM conversation? Yeah, you don't because you want to pretend it never existed, despite my continuous attempts to get you to address my points. Wii Music is excellent and you don't even know it. I'm still available ANYTIME if you want to discuss the game in detail. I can help you man. :lol
Rez said:See, I was under the assumption that most would be playing it on an SDTV. My bad.
HK-47 said:What game is like Madworld...God Hand and dot dot dot
Nirolak said:If you really want games like this to get funded, you have to support them. Despite what you may wish, publishers don't have to do anything.
True, it was the smartest thing I've ever thought.Amir0x said:Maybe if it was 2000, but I don't think that assumption is very good anymore.
smhTheGrayGhost said:I was speaking broadly about "high-octane" action games. I played three solid hours of Left 4 Dead and GoW 2 several weeks ago to decide if I should buy a second console, and I was surprised at how much of an attention span is needed to play these games. That is to say, there is so little to do that I find it hard to focus. I kept asking, "How do I have fun?" And my cousin replied, "Just shoot stuff." So, yeah. I imagine my experience with Madworld will be the same way.
Rez said:True, it was the smartest thing I've ever thought.
Personally, I just can't stand seeing what should be beautiful Wii games being destroyed by HDTVs, so I keep one of my old SDTVs plugged in with my Wii hooked up to it.
That's silly! Under your cause I wouldn't buy the game. Where does that leave Platinum?Mamesj said:I won't tell him you bought it.
this is the whole fucking problem, though.
It's really simple, people:
DO YOU LIKE GAME?
IF YES, BUY
IF NO, DON'T BUY
Better SDTVs are 480p capable too.Rez said:See, I was under the assumption that most would be playing it on an SDTV. My bad.
You are not seeing a decrease in vertical resolution from 480 -> 240, it is intended that the two frames of 240 lines create a single frame with a horizontal resolution of 480. You might as well argue that CRT's have a horizontal resolution of 1 because they only draw one line at a time.TouchMyBox said:Really, a 50% decrease in vertical resolution is pretty significant. This ain't no halo 3 640 lines vs 720 lines thing, it's 480 lines versus 240 lines.
TheGrayGhost said:I was speaking broadly about "high-octane" action games. I played three solid hours of Left 4 Dead and GoW 2 several weeks ago to decide if I should buy a second console, and I was surprised at how much of an attention span is needed to play these games. That is to say, there is so little to do that I find it hard to focus. I kept asking, "How do I have fun?"
Mamesj said:I love it when the game journos flip out and say how nuts people are if they're skeptical of reviews. Gerstman-gate, "oscar-worthy," Assassin's Creed + other review embargos while one 9.0+ review goes up elsewhere -- these are reasons to be skeptical.
though no, I don't think Rupert Murdoch himself is holding a gun to Matt C.'s head. I'm just saying, there's some cause to worry.