• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

IGN Reviewer Threatens He Will Dock Points On Reviews If Games Use Gulf Of America

CLW

Member
Happy World Cup GIF by FIFA


Just WAIT for his reaction to the American Canal and Gay North Dakota
 

peek

Member
Out of the loop on the whole name thing, but just looking at it for a second, gulf of america is technically more inclusive of other countries.

Both the US and mexico are in NA so... xD

People need to be more inclusive.
 

bundylove

Member
Anither thread for the ignore list.

So much happier ever since i started ignoring these mental cases.

Not the Op , the person or topic the thread is about.
 

Gamer79

Predicts the worst decade for Sony starting 2022
IGN is a cesspool for woke liberal ideology. It is a shame because I use to respect them. They are too much into politics and not enough into videogames. Reducing points because you do not agree with something is ludicrous.
 

decisions

Member
Why is it always the blue hairs and trans?
I mean it's quite dark and simple right? They cannot confront the irreversible horror of what they have done in the case that transgender theory is wrong. They will go to extreme lengths to defend it because they have bet their entire life on it.
 

viveks86

Member
Out of the loop on the whole name thing, but just looking at it for a second, gulf of america is technically more inclusive of other countries.

Both the US and mexico are in NA so... xD

People need to be more inclusive.
Ha... Never thought about that. Lol
 
Last edited:

Idleyes

Gold Member
These same goofballs were cheering on the tearing down of statues and renaming mountains, schools, bases, institutions, etc., from their goof-troop brand.

While I agree that destroying statues was a poor decision from a record-keeping perspective, I can't understand why the victorious side would want monuments to those who tried to destroy them displayed on government property. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 

DeepEnigma

Gold Member
While I agree that destroying statues was a poor decision from a record-keeping perspective, I can't understand why the victorious side would want monuments to those who tried to destroy them displayed on government property. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
There is more nuance than that. There were brothers against brothers, friends against friends, etc.. Which is why they are there as a reminder, that in the end, the union was preserved.

They didn't stop there. They escalated it to removing WW2 president (FDR), Lincoln of all people, and the founding fathers like George Washington. And also, renaming a whole damned mountain.

Once again, goof-troop clowns.
 
Last edited:

soulbait

Member
What if it is illegal to drill in the Gulf of Mexico but perfectly legal to drill in the Gulf of America and drilling began once the name was changed.

Still dumb?

Yes still dumb, if not even more dumb.
It means you are changing a name to skirt around a law/policy rather than going through the appropriate means for changing law/policies.
 

Z O N E

Member
Just like that, this reviewer and has now OFFICIALLY announced that their reviews are political in nature.

Congratulations, you played yourself.
 

Danjin44

The nicest person on this forum
This is why I trust my own taste and judgement above any of so called “professional” reviewers, user reviewers, steam reviewers and heck even opinion on gaming forums….all them driven by some kind of BS agenda or culture war nonsense.

Thankfully I played games long enough to know what game is for me regardless of what “score” it gets on reviews.
 
Top Bottom