-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Introducing Battlefield Labs - Help shape the future of BF
- Thread starter HeisenbergFX4
- Start date
TommyCronin6969
Member
Imagine still thinking these cunts can deliver
MiguelItUp
Member
Man, please don't mess this up.
Killjoy-NL
Member
3939 Q, wait time 1hr+...
Hopefully it'll be worth it, whatever this is.
Hopefully it'll be worth it, whatever this is.
HeisenbergFX4
Member
Seems like a lot of people in queue at least hoping they can deliver
Rocco Schiavone
Member
Yeah four studios across the globe and none of them knows how to develop a good BF game.
kutthoat5150
Member
Go to the very end of that video ^ for the sneak peak. I will say the destruction teases look promising
MiguelItUp
Member
For real, 5700+ people in front of me wanting to sign up too, lmao.
No expectations here. I just want one of my favorite IPs to come back and hit like it used to, if not more so. I'd be more than happy to give them another chance. I've loved it since 1942, so the amount of good times I've had out weigh the bad ones ten fold.
Last edited:
Kenneth Haight
Member
That Damn Kid
Member
Not preordering, but destruction looks good.
splattered
Member
Looks promising i hope its good! I used to love playing battlefield along with COD and Unreal Tournament back in the day for variety... hope they can bring this franchise back from the dead. I think they will succeed...
mitch1971
Member
Operators are out, classes in.
NeonGhost
uses 'M$' - What year is it? Not 2002.
For real? can’t watch the video if so that’s some great news
ResilientBanana
Member
Its in frostbite.
Men_in_Boxes
Snake Oil Salesman
Battlefield is dead.
RIP Battlefield.
RIP Battlefield.
Superposition
Member
Everything looks and feels BF3/BF4. I'm surprised, honestly.
Audiophile
Member
I have my doubts that any talent is emerging.
Fake
Member
I not. Again, calling for 'fans' to shape their future, aka, make money for us for free, is kinda blafing.
And I remember their previous BF doing the same with trailers.
HogIsland
Member
you got me. look just make it look good ok?
Another thing: domination always sucked as a mode. there should be maps designed around offensive/defensive objectives like Wolfenstein Enemy Territory. Winning should be an exciting, decisive event in the game, not just a game of whack-a-mole. Battlefield has all the best tools to pull it off.
rodrigolfp
Haptic Gamepads 4 Life
It still is. No need for a remake.
David Ricardo
Member
In the trailer you can´t see the appearance of the characters. I guess they did this because if the characters are woke, players won´t be happy. If the characters aren´t woke, the devs won´t be happy. So seeing they couldn´t make everybody happy, they just decided not showing them
R6Rider
Gold Member
LOL far from it.
Imtjnotu
Member
Killjoy-NL
Member
Breakthrough > Conquest
I prefer the more focused flow of the matches.
What's more important is the presence of hardcore servers.
No HC = no buy.
Last edited:
R6Rider
Gold Member
I prefer Conquest myself, but it's largely map dependent.
They need to have both and also yes include Hardcore for those who enjoy that too.
Also, they don't need to do 128 matches again, but they should at least bump it up from 64. I think 80 would be great without needing to make maps larger than "64 player" sizes.
That being said, if keeping the player count at 64 means better destruction and environmental effects, then that would be okay.
Last edited:
GoldenEye98
posts news as their odd job
Gameplay footage looks good imo...
Highly detailed environments that is modern combat that is more akin to BF3/BF4.
2042's main problem was empty maps and a bland futuristic theme....
Highly detailed environments that is modern combat that is more akin to BF3/BF4.
2042's main problem was empty maps and a bland futuristic theme....
DenchDeckard
Moderated wildly
You fucjing better turn this around Dice! Absolute last chance after that last abomination.
GoldenEye98
posts news as their odd job
My problem with conquest is that the "frontline" is completely random and scattershot.
With breakthrough there is clear frontline and the action is much more intense because of it...
SlimySnake
Flashless at the Golden Globes
Looks amazing. Massive destruction a la Bad Company 2 is back and Im all for it.
Labs is a great initiative. I remember Destiny launching with not one but two betas literally 5 months before launch. Having a beta a week before launch makes no sense. Especially nowadays when there is so many more systems to tune before launch.
Having other SP focused studios work on the SP campaign is also a good common sense move. Zampella making all the right decisions here. Of course, that doesnt mean it will pay off but all this stuff sounds good on paper.
Labs is a great initiative. I remember Destiny launching with not one but two betas literally 5 months before launch. Having a beta a week before launch makes no sense. Especially nowadays when there is so many more systems to tune before launch.
Having other SP focused studios work on the SP campaign is also a good common sense move. Zampella making all the right decisions here. Of course, that doesnt mean it will pay off but all this stuff sounds good on paper.
mansoor1980
Member
Men_in_Boxes
Snake Oil Salesman
I have already announced it's demise.
I do not shovel dirt on GAAS games with any sense of joy.
This franchise is dead and there's no bringing it back.
R6Rider
Gold Member
Have you played the Frontlines mode before? Curious if you prefer that to Breakthrough or not.
Frontlines usually had the problem of the push going back and forth the entire match.
BC2 had the right idea with maps designed around Conquest while others were designed around Rush. More recent titles try to shove all the modes on all the maps when clearly some work better than others.
Similar threads
- Locked