Soulscribe
Member
Found this editorial talking about how high-stakes February will be for Gaga, and how it'll be interesting to see how she'll use that momentum to leverage a big comeback this year.
On her image deconstruction and The Sound of Music:
It was a year ago at the Oscars that Gaga staged her big coming-out as a normal-ish person. Her faithful and lovely tribute to The Sound of Music shocked people who hadnt seen the videos of her pre-meat-dress performances under her birth name Stefani Germanotta, or hadnt listened to her recent Tony Bennett collaboration Cheek to Cheek, or just hadnt paid attention to her pipes on Edge of Glory. She also dropped the shroud she had long held up around her personal life, gushing on social media about her engagement to the actor Taylor Kinney. The year ended with her starring in American Horror Story, a decision that called back to her old loud-proud-freak routine while also attempting to demonstrate her versatility.
On Singing The National Anthem at the Super Bowl:
Theres no more sacred or scary gig than a Super Bowl performance of the national anthem. Botch it, and the caterwauling memes go into your permanent record. Truly nail it, and fans will write awestruck appreciations for decades, as Danyel Smith just did at ESPN with 3,000 words on Whitney Houstons 1991 rendition. Smiths article points out the oft-forgotten fact that Houston lip-synced then; indeed, many other landmark Super Bowl performances of the song, like Jennifer Hudsons in 2009, were prerecorded. Judging by the backlash that followed the allegations of Beyoncé mouthing instead of singing at Barack Obamas 2012 inauguration, though, lip-syncing is still a PR risk; if Gagas still trying to prove that she Really Can Sing, she might try it live.
On performing a tribute to David Bowie at the Grammys:
Either way, shell be back in the spotlight a week later, facing skepticism from those horrified that the Grammys chose her to pay tribute to David Bowie. She is not, however she might like to style herself, this generations answer to David Bowie, Christina Cauterucci wrote at Slate. Well of course she isnt and of course Gaga never actually claimed she is. But if someone has to take on the task, you could do worse than a star who uses ever-changing public personae as performance, has undisguised affection for cabaret, and has worked to undermine old gender and sexuality norms.
Ill agree that the idea of one star of possibly fleeting popularity and still unclear historical importance trying to sum up a career as vast and influential as Bowies feels wrong. But thats why it seems likely that other Bowie-connected performers will be brought in for Gagas three-to-four song medley; already, its been announced that the Chic guitarist and Bowie collaborator Nile Rodgers will participate. Really she has two choices for how to tackle the challenge before her. She can faithfully cover a few of Bowies defining tunes, making for a relatively safe bet as with her Sound of Music performance. Or she can do something weirder and newer that attempts to channel his adventuresome spirit. If its the latter she goes with, the risks of blowback are high, but so is the potential for a career-defining momentmaybe even the return of Gaga the pop star.
On possibly winning an Oscar:
Gaga-uary will end, fittingly, with the Oscars, where she will perform the only piece of original music she put out in her year of normcore: Til It Happens to You, recorded for The Hunting Ground, a documentary about sexual assault on college campuses. The wrenching rock ballad is a frontrunner for Best Original Song, but if its release was an attempt to shore up Gagas credibility as a songwriter, the effort has been sabotaged. Last month, the musician Linda Perry tweeted that Gaga shouldnt receive writing credit for the tune because the recorded version had barely been changed from the demo that co-writer Diane Warren shopped around a while back. Warren disagreed with that assessment and Perry backed down, but the damage had been done. It seems likely that Gagas contribution to the song, aside from the not-minor fact of belting it out forcefully, was altering just a few words.
Gaga and pop music:
But fans of the 08-13 era when she did battle on the Hot 100 might argue that 2016 pop is sorely in need of a Gaga-like presence. The current chart dominators tend to be strained, calculatedly cool presences, whether its Bieber in his lip-biting Sorry phase or Alessia Cara acting like shes so over partying or Selena Gomez shimmying blankly or Drake scowling from the top of the rap heap or Rihanna morosely messing around in the studio. All these artists refuse to find joy in nonsense, and to them I say ro-mah ro-mah-mah, Gaga oh-la-la.
http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2016/02/gaga-february-super-bowl-oscars-grammys/459744/
Honestly doing a tribute to David Bowie is really damn ballsy, I expect his fans are pretty pessimistic about a pop star doing the honors. Being the massive Bowie fanatic that she is though, I think she'll hit it out of the park.
I do think her absence on the pop scene has been felt especially as pop has been trending toward songs that feel "smaller" and less boisterous. Part of me wants her to return to that larger-than-life energy a la Bad Romance, but I also want to see her explore other styles too.
So for you non-cynics, what are your thoughts on her 2016 hustle?