D
Deleted member 47027
Unconfirmed Member
Sheamus is he biff tannen of the WWE
No...
Biff was awesome. Sheamus isn't on Biff's level.
2 Big Shows...with the same finisher.
Sheamus is he biff tannen of the WWE
Yeah 7 weeks.
That's a good thing.
The Elimination Chamber shouldn't even be a PPV We've had this discussion before countless times about how the WWE should have at most 5-6 PPVs a year.
Call me crazy but I like that WWE actually have plenty of PPV events, lets face it aside from a few exceptions like on Raw this week you never get great matches on Raw, you're lucky to even get good matches, at PPV events there's a far greater chance of matches actually being entertaining (and not interrupted by numerous breaks or ending in outside interference).
Also consider that every Road to WM in the last 5 or 6 years has been mostly cack because WWE are incapable of keeping an interesting feud going for more than 3 weeks before the booking falls to the most lazy of tropes, I couldn't handle that for like 2 months straight of the same feud with no pay off.
As long as there's a good 4-5 weeks in between events i'm fine, just got to avoid that October period where WWE kept cramming in another event leading to some 2 week builds.
Granted i'm a product of WWE's 12 PPV's a year tradition, i've never known any different.
Still counting on AJ/Ziggler vs. Kaitlyn/Cody at WrestleMania.
But if they did less PPVs would be forced to market/advertise matches like Punk/Cena on Raw more often.
Kind of like how the WWE would have mini-feuds when Smackdown/Raw had their own PPVs. Since had to kill time between major shows.
This is a good point, though on a side note I can't be the only one who felt that the Smackdown only PPVs tended to be crud outside of their main events most of the time.
It's not March yet!!
I actually preferred the Smackdown only PPVs because they always pushed new stars and feuds.
I mean compare Smackdown's main event scene throughout that era to Raw's and you'd see a stark contrast in our current roster.
Heck even people like Cena,Benoit (I know) and Angle became bigger stars on Smackdown then were moved over to Raw to fill the roster
Anyone pick up WCW Backstage Assault?
Re: video game deal, "Take Two blew us away with commitment in terms of getting us on as many platforms as possible."
No prediction on when WWE Network will launch, but pushing very hard, very optimistic.
Expand
Have not met longer term financial goals yet re: WWE films. If 2013 doesn't go well, WWE may exit this business.
3-4 million subscribers of WWE Network could provide transformative growth. Barrios is confident in this approach.
Proposed price of WWE Network - $12.99 - $14.99 per month
WWE Network will include all Pay Per View events, except Wrestlemania. PPV will still be available on "a la carte" basis.
Re: WWE Network, it is felt that premium domestic subscription model is best approach. Could attract 2-4 million subscribers.
Content monetization are expected to be a large revenue generator in WWE's long term strategy.
Expand
WWE will continue to focus on talent development, content creation, innovative marketing strategies.
WWE Network related costs: 8.2 million. Feel that content investments will yield significant returns.
Barrios: PPV business declined 11% due to reduction in # of events. 3 PPV as opposed to 4. Comparable basis, 4% increase, due to HD buys.
Stuff from wwe investor call from arda orcals twitter
WWE Network related costs: 8.2 million. Feel that content investments will yield significant returns.
That huge library waiting to be cleaned up and shared with the world. WWE Network would be great.
Aren't PPVs still 40 a month or something. So what's stopping someone from ordering the WWE network just for the month the PPV they want to watch is on? Or is that what they're banking on?
Aren't PPVs still 40 a month or something. So what's stopping someone from ordering the WWE network just for the month the PPV they want to watch is on? Or is that what they're banking on?
Finally some Lou Thesz talk!
People make fun when I do and it upsets me.
It's not like they don't have everything they needd to fill a daily schedule on a WWE Network. They've got over a thousand episodes of RAW, like 700 episodes of Smackdown alone you could show one of each per day (Classic RAW, etc), never mind weekly classic PPVs and weekly documentaries from the DVDs, and new WWE programs. You don't need to put dumb reality shows on the Network, the tape libarary alone would fill each day.
That's just WWE stuff, they've got WCW, ECW, AWA, Memphis, JCP, WCCW, all sorts of others they can put out too. Like Nitros on weekdays, WCW PPVs on weekends, classic 70s/80s stuff in the early part of the day, ECW stuff late at night.
They have all this stuff in high quality tapes doing nothing. I think they have every single episode of RAW stored in their vault. Even at one a day, you'd only do a third of all RAW episodes in a year. And of course you can do the non-Big Four WWE PPVs on the Sundays live, just for those subscribers.
Then there's stuff like special promotion weeks you could do like a WCW Week, where you do Nitros, WCW PPVs, documentaries, Clash of the Champions, all sorts.
Of course, you might say, this is awfully hardcore, only the really big fans would subscribe to this Network. Hell, I would, if it were available. But casual fans will never subscribe to a WWE Network even if you dump some dumb reality shows and wrestling cooking shows and whatever else crap you think would attract more viewers. It will never be a huge subscriber base, not even the NFL channel is a big viewer thing. Appeal to everyone who might possibly want to see all these classic (that includes former viewers that loved the Attitude Era) shows and you'd get subscribers.
The thing is, and they mentioned it during the financial call, is that they have all this footage, like you said, doing nothing. Monetizing that through WWE Network is the best route for them to take to make that owned footage finally start earning money.
Man I want this shit so bad. Maybe I can beta test it forever
Of course, you might say, this is awfully hardcore, only the really big fans would subscribe to this Network. Hell, I would, if it were available. But casual fans will never subscribe to a WWE Network even if you dump some dumb reality shows and wrestling cooking shows and whatever else crap you think would attract more viewers. It will never be a huge subscriber base, not even the NFL channel is a big viewer thing. Appeal to everyone who might possibly want to see all these classic (that includes former viewers that loved the Attitude Era) shows and you'd get subscribers.
This is my favourite.
the NFL network is in 60 million homes and is really popular. the WWE should and seems to be following the model NFL network has which is live events + classic shows + some documentaries.
also i believe that the NFL network is part of some tiered package for some providers which helps to get viewers. i think wwe would be an HBO position of charging per customer. it also took forever for A majority of cable provders to carry it. but i think WWE ha a better chance since it would be such a low price to get it.
i also want them to do that legends hosue show they were pitching when the network was almost real.
i think they network is a good deal for 10-15$. 11 out of 12 ppvs basiclly pays for ti self in the savings plus all the other tape library.
the amount of shark week type things they could do is great. would love to see more docs in the style of punks!
There's only one thing that will make that night magical besides a possible snow storm. 80k+ fans booing at these two fools in full force. WM20 is still the best crowd i've been apart of. Real fans don't give a fuck. They called out Lesnar's and Goldberg's bullshit the second the match started. That's my hope for WM29. No matter what happens at the end i'll have my hot dog wrapper and $10 coca-cola cup ready to throw.
Man, i know this thread loves to armchair book and everything, but at least we know how our industry works and can keep our expectations in line. The Skullgirls thread in Gaming is just a mess.
The show opened strong with the Vince McMahon segment with Paul Heyman, Brock Lesnar and HHH doing a 3.6 quarter. We only have estimates on the gains and losses. Ryback vs. Dolph Ziggler lost about 285,000 viewers. The C.M. Punk promo and trailer for The Call gained about 420,000 viewers which is huge for that time slot. Mark Henry vs. Great Khali lost about 285,000 viewers. The 9 p.m. in-ring with Jack Swagger, Zeb Colter and Alberto Del Rio gained about 285,000 viewers and did a strong 3.7 quarter. Randy Orton vs. Antonio Cesaro lost about 430,000 viewers. R-Truth vs. Cody Rhodes stayed even. Daniel Bryan & Kane vs. Prime Time Players with Bryan blindfolded and Kane having his hand tied behind his back lost another 285,000 viewers. The Shield promo at 10 p.m. with Randy Orton and Sheamus involved gained about 285,000 viewers to a 3.4. Jack Swagger vs. The Miz was the big drop losing 450,000 viewers. The John Cena promo gained 140,000 viewers. And John Cena vs. C.M. Punk gained about 1,002,000 viewers and finished with a 3.9 overrun. Thats a huge success.
Someone say shark Johnson week
That thread feels like a neverending Cena match with stupidity overcoming the odds against logic and reason all the timeA fascinating read though that can shift into hilariously bewildering at a moments notice, keeps you on the edge of your seat like a good back and forth wrasslin' match.
Who knew that if you build a match and give it time people will actually watch your show? Vince must be legit shook by this.