S
slugbahr
Unconfirmed Member
Agreed. Tell Matt to shut the fuck up to his face.
Bitch do you wanna get mocked
Nothing you say will be as embarrassing as this.
Please shush.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/174bd/174bd72007fe0b96bbb1110d483fe9b33b4f3cdf" alt="ezgif.com-resize.gif"
Agreed. Tell Matt to shut the fuck up to his face.
Bitch do you wanna get mocked
Nothing you say will be as embarrassing as this.
Please shush.
Today will be remembered as the day when GAF members were belligerent with one another.smh this guy
That's every day thoToday will be remembered as the day when GAF members were belligerent with one another.
One of the best episodes next to Bart Vs. AustraliaThis is me vs Carbum
![]()
I'm just messing with you, matt.. Why are you getting emotional over permabanned accounts.
People are going to take their parting shots. It’s hardly a big deal.
Are you sure I’m the one being messed with?
You just want them to fight shirtless, don't you?You guys need to just dock and get it over with.
You just want them to fight shirtless, don't you?
lmaoOh......kinky![]()
Did you dyke it?
![]()
The next evolution of the strand genre.docking is now cock stranding
Urban Dictionary: docking
The delicious act of two men rubbing the heads of their dicks together, with one of the men's foreskin being stretched over the head of his partner's dick. Add a little leakage (precum) from one (or both of their dicks), mutual excitement, rubbing, grinding, heavy breathing and the result is a...www.urbandictionary.com
![]()
Saw a video of this once.
And then he came
Now kith.
Oh man, the visuals I got in my head when I read thiscum on tars
But that wouldn't be a two-man job like docking anymoreonly if you turn that camera off and get involved, big daddy
SurprisedEnygger_Tzu didn't get a permaban.
SurprisedEnygger_Tzu didn't get a permaban. Racists aren't welcome so keep those opinions to yourself in the race threads. See you in a month and change.
Edit: This reads like I'm wagging my finger at him lol, but I appreciate posters with balls to speak their minds. I was trying to be a bit cheeky about how we have a lot of racial threads but really you're only allowed to express certain opinions on the topic.
About JordanN I'm not sure if he had realized yet but that thread Yoshi created started with somewhat empty claims but now it's been what... 2 weeks since the thread has been created and JordanN is still sitting there with his long ass posts with his claims based on statistics.We have a wide variety of opinions that are acceptable. Hell, JordanN isn't banned yet and constantly missuses scientific data to extrapolate rather... *interesting* claims. What Enygger-Tzu did was outright racist and chances are, knowing them, they will return to quickly cop a permanent ban with further racist idiocy.
Neither support of the first nor the second amendment makes you a racist, which is a necessary (but not sufficient) condition for being a (neo)nazi. Comments by some random Resetera user are also not more than that: Comments by some random person on the internet.There was a post on Resetera the other day that claimed supporting the 1st and 2nd amendment makes you a confirmed Nazi. Will I be banned for saying I support free speech now?
Why? Is it because you have facts to support this, or is it because of what your feelings say?Neither support of the first nor the second amendment makes you a racist,
First amendment is the freedom of speech and religion, the second amendment concerns the right to bear firearms, racism is defined here:Why? Is it because you have facts to support this, or is it because of what your feelings say?
The freedom of speech is not a statement about race and the right to bear firearms (not limited by ethnicity in any way) are not and do not include the belief that humans can and should be separated by race, so we do not need to check the rest of the definition, it does not match. You can use the rights granted by the amendments to perform acts rooted in racism, but supporting these rights does not make you a racist. You can be a racist and in support of either (or both), you can also be a racist and be in support of neither.Racism is the belief, that humans can and should be separated by race and that these races are superior/inferior to each other (in various aspects) or should receive preferential treatment on the basis of their race. It is expressed, also in race-based generalisations.
Or maybe it is just a case of a single individual on the site saying something incorrect about racism.I use Reset as an example of what happens when a left-wing echo chambers gets it way and soon what's to impose its definition of "racism" upon the world.
Well thank god there's a thread on Neogaf that keeps a long record of them saying "incorrect" stuff. It's never a one time thing, And if you missed my edit, I just showed you a thread where one user complaining about racism got the entire Staff to come to his aid and ban users who disagreed.Or maybe it is just a case of a single individual on the site saying something incorrect about racism.
Why? Is it because you have facts to support this, or is it because of what your feelings say?
See, that's the difference right there. Anything can be called racist as long as the justification is "my feelings don't like this".
I use Reset as an example of what happens when a left-wing echo chambers gets it way and soon want's to impose its definition of "racism" upon the world (and don't pretend they don't. They' continue to harass game developers with bogus claims, like their recent offense at a Crash Team Racing game) .
Meanwhile, the reason Neogaf doesn't go down this path is not because we refuse to be like Resetera, but because certain facts still matter.
You shouldn't care what I do. I can look after myself.You ever wonder if you spend too much time on Resetera? It might be good to give going there a break for a while.
You shouldn't care what I do. I can look after myself.
Well, I used the definition, whether something is racist is not a matter of feelings one way or the other.@Yoshi, any attempt at justifying the 1st and 2nd amendment without the use of feelings, is using fact.
The 1st and 2nd amendment could totally be racist if enough people got together and decided (based on feelings) that any support for them makes you a Nazi.
You mean the Tawna thread? This is about racism though, because it is about (allegedly) using racist stereotypes in the game. This is not the same issue. Whether it is fair to claim that the game uses the stereotype, is a different question I am not interested in discussing. Support of first and second amendment is not about racism though.And if you missed my edit, I just showed you a thread where one user complaining about racism got the entire Staff to come to his aid and ban users who disagreed.
Irony.Well, I used the definition, whether something is racist is not a matter of feelings one way or the other.
Show me in U.S history when Bandicoots were associated with watermelon?Yoshi said:You mean the Tawna thread? This is about racism though, because it is about (allegedly) using racist stereotypes in the game. This is not the same issue. Whether it is fair to claim that the game uses the stereotype, is a different question I am not interested in discussing. Support of first and second amendment is not about racism though.
The argument is that the colour of the Bandicoot was specifically chosen to mock black people. You need not agree that this is the case, but if they did choose the darker skin tone for Tawna deliberately because of the watermelon prejudice, then it would be a matter of racism. Of course, it stands to be argued whether they did it because of the racist prejudice (I doubt that!) but the accusation is one of racism.Show me in U.S history when Bandicoots were associated with watermelon?
That is not a human character.
Now you're lying.The argument is that the colour of the Bandicoot was specifically chosen to mock black people.
The argument is that the colour of the Bandicoot was specifically chosen to mock black people. You need not agree that this is the case, but if they did choose the darker skin tone for Tawna deliberately because of the watermelon prejudice, then it would be a matter of racism. Of course, it stands to be argued whether they did it because of the racist prejudice (I doubt that!) but the accusation is one of racism.
It is. Quoting Post #3 as an example:Now you're lying.
The thread is not complaining about a dark colored character.
They also acknowledged that other characters with a watermelon skin exist that do not have darker toned skin / fur - and they do not complain about those.Yeah I can see why, I think if they didnt make the skin colour darker then I'd be okay but yeah, i dont know who approved that choice.
SurprisedEnygger_Tzu didn't get a permaban. Racists aren't welcome so keep those opinions to yourself in the race threads. See you in a month and change.
Edit: This reads like I'm wagging my finger at him lol, but I appreciate posters with balls to speak their minds. I was trying to be a bit cheeky about how we have a lot of racial threads but really you're only allowed to express certain opinions on the topic.