Daniel_Mallorca1985
Member
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6434/c6434b169d9ce4763053dd302920c3a152733ed9" alt="insider-gaming.com"
EXCLUSIVE: Microsoft, Activision Report Regarding Financial Performance Is Missing Context
Microsoft and Activision have denied a recent report regarding the financial performance since the acquisition.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e980a/e980aac1c0eef3f0dcd1f9aeda07b0c0acafc8c2" alt="insider-gaming.com"
Cooking of the books goes brrrrrrrrr.
Well, it is certainly true it had a lot of negative impacts...From what i recall the original article was mainly about the lack of impact on Gamepass subscriptions, which is true but it used this to imply that the acquisition had not a lot of impact on Xbox overall, which is obviously false.
The information is a really well-respected outlet amongst high-powered execs, and they are known for high-quality journalism.Haha surprised MS responded to this at all. Looks like they didn't like that report. Well be interesting to see what they say during their next quarterly report.
The information is a really well-respected outlet amongst high-powered execs, and they are known for high-quality journalism.
For example, they broke the FTX scandal that led to Sam Bankman-Fried's incarceration.
I don't understand your point. There is no Activision anymore, not in the sense of an independant company, it's a subsidiary of Microsoft. If they take more space than XGS it's because Microsoft Gaming wants it that way.Well, it is certainly true it had a lot of negative impacts...
As it were, Activision is actually more valuable than Xbox itself. Which means now just like how Activision absorbed Blizzard, now it is Xbox's turn to be assimilated into Activision. Don't forget, Activision was founded by former Atari developers. They INVENTED 3rd party console studios!
Well, it is certainly true it had a lot of negative impacts...
As it were, Activision is actually more valuable than Xbox itself. Which means now just like how Activision absorbed Blizzard, now it is Xbox's turn to be assimilated into Activision. Don't forget, Activision was founded by former Atari developers. They INVENTED 3rd party console studios!
Their annual sub can reach $750/yr. This is an outlet whose reporting is firmly targeted towards Wall St. people.I didn't know that. Well it makes perfect sense why MS responded then.
What if Satya hired Bobby back?Well, it is certainly true it had a lot of negative impacts...
As it were, Activision is actually more valuable than Xbox itself. Which means now just like how Activision absorbed Blizzard, now it is Xbox's turn to be assimilated into Activision. Don't forget, Activision was founded by former Atari developers. They INVENTED 3rd party console studios!
The information is a really well-respected outlet amongst high-powered execs, and they are known for high-quality journalism.
For example, they broke the FTX scandal that led to Sam Bankman-Fried's incarceration.
After reaching out to Activision and Microsoft for comment, representatives from both companies not only said The Information’s report wasn’t accurate and “through omission is misrepresenting the business”, but provided context to show how the company has performed since the purchase along with the state of Microsoft gaming.
Regarding Xbox Game Pass, Nadella said that the service set a record for the number of new Game Pass subscriptions on Call of Duty: Black Ops 6’s launch day. He added that the service “set a new Q1 record for total revenue and average revenue per subscriber.”
Moving on to the suggestion from the report that, in 2021, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella said that the company could “wind down its games business entirely”, the company flat out denies that. They point to comments made around that time with Nadella expressing that Microsoft is “all in on gaming”.
Well anyway, looks like that analyst missed the mark on this one.
Yes, it's not like MS execs have ever backtracked from their previous statements.Well anyway, looks like that analyst missed the mark on this one.
I've always said that the next quarterly release will be critical for MS Gaming:It's not only that, reports from them also have the ability to have an impact on stock performance.
The article here quoted a portfolio manager from Janus Henderson, who have roughly $12 billion invested in Microsoft.
The fact they're just outright sending the actual PR troops to handle this instead of the shill podcasters is very telling.It wasn't an analyst. It was a portfolio manager from Janus Henderson.
Huge difference.
It wasn't an analyst. It was a portfolio manager from Janus Henderson.
Huge difference.
The report quotes (paywalled) one analyst—portfolio manager Danny Fish
I read the article and this was all I could find from that investor:It's not only that, reports from them also have the ability to have an impact on stock performance.
The article here quoted a portfolio manager from Janus Henderson, who have roughly $12 billion invested in Microsoft.
It stops being an opinion piece when the person being quoted manages ~335 billion dollars.
Idk if this shows for all countries, but you can actually see the full article if you give them an email. I did this and thus have access to the full piece.I don't know who he is, just using the terminology in the article, which calls him both.
“[Activision] has been disappointing,” said Denny Fish, a Janus Henderson Investors portfolio manager who oversees two funds that included a total of more than $800 million in Microsoft stock as of November. “It’s also a business that had some degree of consistency over, like, a three-to-five-year period but was highly volatile from year to year, because you’re so dependent on the big releases like Call of Duty.”
I wonder what it will take for them to be honest this time. With Game Pass, it was being under oath at the FTC trial, for example.
The fact they're just outright sending the actual PR troops to handle this instead of the shill podcasters is very telling.
I don't know who he is, just using the terminology in the article, which calls him both.
I read the article and this was all I could find from that investor:
“[Activision] has been disappointing,” said Denny Fish, a Janus Henderson Investors portfolio manager who oversees two funds that included a total of more than $800 million in Microsoft stock as of November. “It’s also a business that had some degree of consistency over, like, a three- to five-year period but was highly volatile from year to year, because you’re so dependent on the big releases like Call of Duty.”
Doesn't provide a lot of context
Well anyway, looks like that analyst missed the mark on this one.
If there are similar feelings amongst other fund managers, then it means that they did their analysis independently and came to the same conclusion. Which means that MS denying it with "no u" really isn't going to move the needle.If there is a similar feeling amongst other fund managers who have sizable holdings in Microsoft stock then this sort of thing can trigger a huge sell-off. We are talking about a 80 billion dollar investment (the biggest in Microsoft's history) not yielding desired results.
The context is that when you manage such huge amounts of money it is your duty to do investigative work and stay close to people inside the businesses you invest the fund's money in. If he's saying that it will be because the people he speaks to within the respective businesses have indicated as such. Of course, their interpretation of the situation could be incorrect, but there's rarely smoke without fire in these kinds of situations.
So in a nutshell, we know he missed the mark because Microsoft denied it?
No way!
I miss Baghdad Bob.
also
![]()
To be fair to Adam and others, it's the Insider Gaming reporter that called him an analyst.Calling someone who is a fund manager an analyst is wide of the mark. Typically people who end up in those positions start out in the world as analysts, but his role is much more significant than that.