• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Nintendo Switch Online price increase. Is it justified?



Currently you can buy 1 year of NSO for $20.

It seems Nintendo plans to adopt Sony's pricing scheme and maybe remove the cheaper tier? (even if they don't remove it, the price gulf between 20 and 70 is too high, so expect them to increase that too)

How is this justified? Adding party chat (most likely p2p, which is free) is not a compelling reason.

Will Switch 1 owners get screwed (20 -> 70) if they just wanna play Mario Kart/Splatoon online?

Should people stack a few more years of regular NSO at $20?
 

StereoVsn

Gold Member


Currently you can buy 1 year of NSO for $20.

It seems Nintendo plans to adopt Sony's pricing scheme and maybe remove the cheaper tier? (even if they don't remove it, the price gulf between 20 and 70 is too high, so expect them to increase that too)

How is this justified? Adding party chat (most likely p2p, which is free) is not a compelling reason.

Will Switch 1 owners get screwed (20 -> 70) if they just wanna play Mario Kart/Splatoon online?

Should people stack a few more years of regular NSO at $20?

Need to know what Nintendo is offering at $70 first.

Switch in US at $500 wouldn’t sell well beyond the early adapters.
 

Robb

Gold Member
Nintendo Switch Online price increase. Is it justified?

Season 2 Lol GIF by Insecure on HBO


NSO isn’t worth its current price, so definitely not.
 

bender

What time is it?
Tetris 99 is one of the best games of the generation and F-Zero 99 is great too. They'll always have a base subscription from me for those titles. It will be interesting to see if they add platforms to the expansion pass tier.
 
Why would they show BotW upscaled (I assume through backwards compatibility) and then also release a 'remastered' version of it? Makes little sense to me, so I assume this is fake info.

Anyway, NSO will likely increase in price at some point and no it's not worth it. Paying for online play has always been a scam and I hate that Sony and Nintendo followed suit.
 

BlackTron

Member
I already said if they launch with BOTW as launch game I skip, just let me upscale old one. But they're doing both?

Glad I can overlook this, it doesn't make much sense.
 

Killer8

Member
The potential for Switch 2 to be able to play backwards compatible Switch games with their docked settings in portable mode is perhaps the most exciting thing for me.
 
Nintendos online service is dog crap. It feels like something from the early 2000s. Every nintendo game runs like poo poo and lags consistently because the next time nintendo gets actual servers instead of using peer to peer connections will be the first time. Add to that you got 0 achievement system, 0 way to communicate with people online, 0 way to voice chat with people outside of some dumb terrible mobile app and man ohh man is the service junk. The funny thing is that nintendo had a better online service for the wii then they do now and that service was free. So is a price increase justified you ask....


no-absolutely.gif
 
Last edited:

Lunarorbit

Member
A 50 dollar increase is huge. I like the price it is now. Because it is just a service I casually use. And 20 a year is not much. I am sure an increase is incoming. Make the base plan 40.
If they actually put a little effort into nso i would be OK with $40.

I'm 100% with this statement, "Because it is just a service I casually use."
 
Are we sure this is saying $20 > $70 or $50 > $70?

Because it could mean the Online + Expansion Pass is going up $20.
Even if that's the case, is there any chance of keeping the lower tier at $20?

What will happen to NSO subscribers that have stacked up to 3 years of subscription? (I assume they won't be affected, but you never know with Nintendo)

I also hope BoTW Remastered doesn't mean paying another $70 instead of a free patch, but it looks like they want to copy Sony's strategy.

Risky moves, these could affect Switch 2's success. More so if it's priced at $499 due to tariffs.
 

RoboFu

One of the green rats
For me it's worth it... much more than psn or xbl.
I don't play multiplayer online games but I do play and use the stuff that comes with Nintendo online.

And yeah if the switch 2 gets Elden ring and all the jrpgs that have online aspects then I can drop my psn sub for sure.
 
Last edited:

GoldenEye98

posts news as their odd job
Are we sure this is saying $20 > $70 or $50 > $70?

Because it could mean the Online + Expansion Pass is going up $20.

That's what it reads as...

If the base NSO is still $20/yr that's not so bad at all.

Would still be a cheaper way to play something like COD MP compared to the other consoles....
 

Bridges

Member
I call bullshit. Random Redditor "I have my sources" making completely milquetoast claims and making price guesses. I remember when fake leaks at least used to be fun
 

Topher

Identifies as young
1080p and 2K are the same thing. Do they mean 1440p docked?

"2K" isn't really a thing in terms of TV resolutions at all.

Think most mean 1440p when they say 2k but you are correct. If it is true that they can render 1440p and get 60 fps then I'm immediately interested. Hopefully that will apply to old games. without having to have them all be patched, but I doubt it.
 
499$
Online price hikes without games
69$/79€ games

NKids gonna love the new Nintendo.
Nintendo kids haven't bought a new Nintendo system since the 90s, I reckon.

These days Nintendo consoles are a bit expensive for kids (not to mention smartphones are way more popular), so it's mostly adults with Nintendo nostalgia that buy them.
 

Parazels

Member
Is Switch 2 powerful enough to run BotW at 2K@60fps?

I know the proportion is not linear, but the calculation says it should render 2x more pixels at 2x higher resolution.
 

JORMBO

Darkness no more
It is a random Twitter account that posts whatever they want to their 2k followers. It's obviously fake.
But let's say it is real...I do not think Switch online is worth $70. $50 is ok, but that is kind of stretching it. Online+cloud saves+roms isn't really a great value. $50 is cheap enough that I don't think much about it even though the value probably isn't there. Once things go above that then I start to think on if I would rather save the money or not.
 

Soodanim

Gold Member
How am I supposed to respect anyone that refers to 1440p as 2K? 2.5K is more accurate, and 3K would make more sense marketing wise given that it's the main resolution between 1080p and 2160p. At least stick with QHD and promote a term that has origins rooted in sanity instead of this cuntery.

1080p has more claim to the 2K name than 2160p does to 4K name given it's only 80 pixels short of being 2000 wide vs being 160 short of 4000 wide. How does 2560 even remotely follow the same logic when you're past half way but still rounding down? I can only guess it comes from the same geniuses that named the USB 3 variants.

So no, a $70 NSO is not justified.
 
Even if that's the case, is there any chance of keeping the lower tier at $20?

What will happen to NSO subscribers that have stacked up to 3 years of subscription? (I assume they won't be affected, but you never know with Nintendo)

I also hope BoTW Remastered doesn't mean paying another $70 instead of a free patch, but it looks like they want to copy Sony's strategy.

Risky moves, these could affect Switch 2's success. More so if it's priced at $499 due to tariffs.
Looks like in both images it's talking about the Expansion Pass. Hopefully that means GC or Wii games are coming.
That's what it reads as...

If the base NSO is still $20/yr that's not so bad at all.

Would still be a cheaper way to play something like COD MP compared to the other consoles....
Yeah, OP and another post seemed to think otherwise but to me it just came across as a $20 increase for the expansion pass which if they are adding in GameCube and Wii or even just GameCube (I've literally finished like 2 games on Wii being Fragile Dreams and Fatal Frame 2) I'm not that mad about it.

I doubt the standard tier stays at $20 but I also doubt it goes any higher then $30/$40.

2K docked means no DLSS.
It is probably just using DLSS to upscale something like 1080p (or even 720p 😩) to an output resolution of 1440p.
 
Top Bottom