What is GAF consensus then?
SwiftDeath. Please keep up.
What is GAF consensus then?
I didnt make the claim he did. Please be quiet.
In this thread you have to back up your statements as we've just seen.
I did not. I just checked again, my first post about this topic was asking you for source.
Then you can easily find the quote where I did.
I'm pretty sure the gameplan is to sarcastically berate them a bit then maybe go play some Destiny
And since I'm clearly Gaf's consensus now...
SwiftDeath. Please keep up.
Uh no, you made the claim. I'm really interested to see the source.
You're not, but I too read that thread and 4.5 million isn't an unreasonable number to pick from it. I was thinking a little lower 4.3, but 4.5 isn't crazy going by it. What is GAF consensus then?
That's such a strawman. People in that thread were estimating all over the place, Swiftdeath's post was an example of the high and low estimates. Using an average or close to it seems to be a fair way to come up with a "consensus" estimate.
Prove I did. My post was in respond to someone who said the PS3 beat the 360. Which there is no proof of.
Never happened. 360 is still ahead.
No I am talking about world wide sales. 360 hit 84 before the ps3 did. Ps3 never passed the 360...yet. There is no evidence to suggest otherwise.
Now that you know how to look for source, can you give me the link that shows 360 reached 84 millions earlier than PS3? ;-)
What do you mean "you people"?
If you say so
As someone who's studying for the bar, this thread reads like a bad case of hearsay.
Because based on trajectory the reasonable assumption is that the PS3 is ahead.I like how the post I responded to is missing. You sure like being a troll. Best to ignore you as your an obvious trap.
1) That was a joke
2) The majority of posts in that thread go for 4.2. Including SwiftDeath shortly after his firstguesstimate.awful
Being the GAF consensus I guess he had to anyway
But anyway, on Tuesday I 100% guaranteed that the Xbox, one sold over 5 million to consumers, which is my original point. I will standby my statement being 4.5-4.8 only is Impossible. But we'll find out on Tuesday.
I suspect MS will only be announcing shipped numbers, so all of this will have been for nothing.But anyway, on Tuesday I 100% guaranteed that the Xbox, one sold over 5 million to consumers, which is my original point. I will standby my statement being 4.5-4.8 only is Impossible. But we'll find out on Tuesday.
But anyway, on Tuesday I 100% guaranteed that the Xbox, one sold over 5 million to consumers, which is my original point. I will standby my statement being 4.5-4.8 only is Impossible. But we'll find out on Tuesday.
So would you say 4.2 was the consensus?
LinkCare to explain how it's incorrect? Or rather, care to explain how XBox One is more like the PS3 than the Wii U?
Also, Ps3 beat 360. Didn't know if you'd heard. It happened quite a while ago. The more important point was that the first two years of the PS3's sales were the worst and then it continued to increase in yearly sales until now. Who is to say that the worst years of the Wii U's sales aren't behind us?
No I am talking about world wide sales. 360 hit 84 before the ps3 did. Ps3 never passed the 360...yet. There is no evidence to suggest otherwise.
Your theory is incorrect. Not only that, ps3 beat the 360?
But anyway, on Tuesday I 100% guaranteed that the Xbox, one sold over 5 million to consumers, which is my original point. I will standby my statement being 4.5-4.8 only is Impossible. But we'll find out on Tuesday.
Stop running and prove the PS3 is ahead. You believe it, you said it, you claimed it. Once you do that I will show you my responce.Because based on trajectory the reasonable assumption is that the PS3 is ahead.
But you made an actual positive assertion that this is wrong in addition to asserting a specific milestone was hit earlier by the 360, so you need to back it up. Do you not know what burden of proof is when assertions are made?
I didn't claim it. Stop saying I did. It's annoying to be accused by you of all people.Stop running and prove the PS3 is ahead. You believe it, you said it, you claimed it. Once you do that I will show you my responce.
Man, you're trying too hard.
The first one is about Titanfall sales.
Ask yourself this: if MS is above 5M sold to consumers let's say, it'll most likely be something low like 5.2/5.3 somehow
So why would MS want to announce publicly that XB1 sold through say 5.2M consoles WW in July when Sony announced 7M sold through back in April?
Not a smart PR move I would think
Note: I don't actually think MS is above 5M sold through mind you, it's purely a hypothetical
Ok, now it's just getting weird.
No it's someone trying to calculate XBO sales from titanfall sales stats.
BOOM THAT SIZZLE IN MY STEAK SAYS IM HOT!
You are talking about the US market, whereas the other user is talking about worldwide sales. So both of you are right.
No I am talking about world wide sales. 360 hit 84 before the ps3 did. Ps3 never passed the 360...yet. There is no evidence to suggest otherwise.
The report also highlights that just this past December, Sony's PS3 managed to surpass the number of Xbox 360s shipped worldwide (about 77 million vs. 76 million), despite the PS3 launching a year later.
Investors?
Investors?
In all fairness, 360 did hit 80m WW about 1 month before the PS3 did, late last year. I believe that's according to official announcements from both Microsoft and then - a month later - Sony. As you mentioned, I believe PS3 is ahead simply based on trajectory, and I think (maybe not?) I am the one whose statement spurned the initial "no way that PS3 is ahead" mini-argument about 6 pages back. Never knew that either console maker had announced 84m or which one had hit it first, however.Because based on trajectory the reasonable assumption is that the PS3 is ahead.
But you made an actual positive assertion that this is wrong in addition to asserting a specific milestone was hit earlier by the 360, so you need to back it up. Do you not know what burden of proof is when assertions are made?
Stop running and prove the PS3 is ahead. You believe it, you said it, you claimed it. Once you do that I will show you my responce.
I didn't claim it. Stop saying I did. It's annoying to be accused by you of all people.
BOOM THAT SIZZLE IN MY STEAK SAYS IM HOT!
Isleofsancroy said:Lol get a source that is not laughed at on had please.
Something is going to give. I can feel it.
http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articl...to-remain-revenue-mainstays-for-years-to-come
Just stahp. plz
Why would investors be happy to hear that you're still like 2M behind your closest competitor after like 3 months?
Sorry, I had beans.
Are you people seriously going to ban someone for talking about a "GAF consensus"? Come on.
If you have a problem being held accountable for scattershot statements, this may not be the thread for you. Try Pop-GAF.In this thread you have to back up your statements as we've just seen.
Well to be fair IDC clearly messed up, unless Microsoft somehow managed to catch up by late 2013.
Very happy with those MK8 numbers.
I don't quite get the PS4.
I'm not gonna purchase one yet, but since it's a self fulfilling prophecy in terms of where the games go, with these sales, eventually I'll have to buy one too.