Trojita
Rapid Response Threadmaker
In a 5-4 decision they literally changed the course of American History.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_v._Gore
They basically ruled by a 7-2 decision that all votes need to be treated equally and then in a 5-4 decision decided "Fuck actually counting them" because there isn't enough time.
Who decided against the recount?
William H. Rehnquist
Sandra Day O'Connor
Antonin Scalia
Anthony M. Kennedy
Clarence Thomas
Who decided for the recount?
John Paul Stevens
David H. Souter
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen G. Breyer
That's how terrifying the future of The Supreme Court is.
Need I remind you this doesn't even factor in the people that voted for 1 candidate by accident due to the fuck up of the Butterfly Ballot where no matter what Bush would likely have little to no loss votes while Gore would have plenty that either double voted (which the recount could check but not 100% verify every person's intent if they didn't right down the candidate or the people that voted once thinking they voted Democrat but didn't realize they clicked on (likely) the Reform Party.
Seriously look at these monstrosities if you forgot them
Then you are thinking could it get worse?
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/12/us/examining-vote-method-consortium-organizations-conducted-ballot-review.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_v._Gore
Noting that the Equal Protection clause guarantees individuals that their ballots cannot be devalued by "later arbitrary and disparate treatment," the per curiam opinion held 7-2 that the Florida Supreme Court's scheme for recounting ballots was unconstitutional. Even if the recount was fair in theory, it was unfair in practice. The record suggested that different standards were applied from ballot to ballot, precinct to precinct, and county to county. Because of those and other procedural difficulties, the court held, 5 to 4, that no constitutional recount could be fashioned in the time remaining (which was short because the Florida legislature wanted to take advantage of the "safe harbor" provided by 3 USC Section 5).
Loathe to make broad precedents, the per curiam opinion limited its holding to the present case. Rehnquist (in a concurring opinion joined by Scalia and Thomas) argued that the recount scheme was also unconstitutional because the Florida Supreme Court's decision made new election law, which only the state legislature may do. Breyer and Souter (writing separately) agreed with the per curiam holding that the Florida Court's recount scheme violated the Equal Protection Clause, but they dissented with respect to the remedy, believing that a constitutional recount could be fashioned. Time is insubstantial when constitutional rights are at stake. Ginsburg and Stevens (writing separately) argued that for reasons of federalism, the Florida Supreme Court's decision ought to be respected. Moreover, the Florida decision was fundamentally right; the Constitution requires that every vote be counted.
They basically ruled by a 7-2 decision that all votes need to be treated equally and then in a 5-4 decision decided "Fuck actually counting them" because there isn't enough time.
Who decided against the recount?
William H. Rehnquist
Sandra Day O'Connor
Antonin Scalia
Anthony M. Kennedy
Clarence Thomas
Who decided for the recount?
John Paul Stevens
David H. Souter
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen G. Breyer
The NORC Consortium Study also found that the actual statewide Florida recount with disputed ballots containing overvotes (where a voter hole-punches multiple candidates but writes out the name of their intended candidate) would have resulted in Gore emerging as the victor by between 60 and 171 votes, if the Supreme Court had not stopped the recount.
That's how terrifying the future of The Supreme Court is.
Need I remind you this doesn't even factor in the people that voted for 1 candidate by accident due to the fuck up of the Butterfly Ballot where no matter what Bush would likely have little to no loss votes while Gore would have plenty that either double voted (which the recount could check but not 100% verify every person's intent if they didn't right down the candidate or the people that voted once thinking they voted Democrat but didn't realize they clicked on (likely) the Reform Party.
Seriously look at these monstrosities if you forgot them
Then you are thinking could it get worse?
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/12/us/examining-vote-method-consortium-organizations-conducted-ballot-review.html
The subsequent analysis revealed that black-majority precincts had three times as many rejected ballots as white precincts. "For minorities, the ballot survey found, a recount would not have redressed the inequities because most ballots were beyond retrieving. But a recount could have restored the votes of thousands of older voters whose dimpled and double-voted ballots were indecipherable to machines but would have been clear in a ballot-by-ballot review." The ballot review later conducted by a consortium of news organization did not have access to these decisive ballots, which in many cases had disappeared and could not be produced.