What the fuck?APF said:If I were in a state where my vote mattered, I'd vote for Obama.
harSon said:There are 9 states outside of Pennsylvania as well![]()
Cheebs said:IMO I think it helps Obama in the long run for his negatives to go up and this to be dragged out. Why? Because that would happen anyway. The media is digging up his dirty laundry and smacking him around now.
Would you rather have the Rezko story pop up in the middle of March or the weekend before the general election? Gotta look at this with some perspective.
GhaleonEB said:From what I've read today he's been defending Wright and the church.
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/
gcubed said:The more they get all this shit out of the way now, the less the Republicans have come Novemeber.
Clevinger said:what happened?
siamesedreamer said:Not really. The Swiftboaters came out in April and were largely forgot about until they resurfaced in September.
Obama and Wright have provided more than enough footage to keep the 527s very busy this fall. The commercials that will run are gonna be very harsh I imagine.
v1cious said:they were going around New York asking people about Omama's relgion, and like 9 ot of 10 said he was muslim.
v1cious said:they were going around New York asking people about Omama's relgion, and like 9 ot of 10 said he was muslim.
gcubed said:i agree that it actually makes him a stronger candidate as they are dragging anything and everything out now. Right now, unless something catastropic happens, Obama is the Dem Nominee. The more they get all this shit out of the way now, the less the Republicans have come Novemeber.
I'm trying to look on the bright side.
I am extremely disappointed with NPR's -- along with most of the rest of the media's -- coverage of the remaining two Democratic Presidential candidates.
Despite it being almost impossible for Hillary Clinton to pull ahead now in either popular vote or delegate count, the majority of the media continues to buy into her narrative that it's anyone's race, and happily follows along each time she moves the goalposts to redefine how to measure her success.
I'm inclined to side with MSNBC's Chuck Todd, one of the few who is paying attention to the delegate and popular vote math in this race, when he said, "There is a media obsession with the idea that this is a 50/50 race." I suspect that in the interests of perpetuating the alluring story that the race is still up in the air, many in the media are deliberately choosing to ignore the almost insurmountable math against Clinton. Unfortunately, by continuing to shape this story in a fashion that is not faithful to reality, NPR is not only doing its listeners a grave disservice, but the Democratic Party as a whole.
The media can and does have a significant impact in when this contest will finally be laid to rest. I implore NPR to hasten its end by reporting the facts, which are simple: even a big Hilary win in PA -- which would undoubtedly be branded as yet another "Clinton Comeback" -- would not be enough to overcome her ever-growing deficits in the popular vote and the delegate count.
Clevinger said:what happened?
harSon said:13% of the people they interviewed on the streets thought Obama was Muslim.
lopaz said:Psh. I think the Iraq thing is going to bite the Dem's assways. Methinks opinion is turning against withdrawal
gcubed said:i dont buy it.
Right now the economy is the #1 topic. Want to steer the convo back to withdrawl?
"The war is costing us 12 billion dollars a DAY"
The general population isnt very smart. The only reason why the opinion is even remotely getting close to turning against a withdrawl is because you have no competitor to a republican candidate that keeps spouting off about staying in Iraq forever.
Triumph said:I don't think Hillary is going to do as well in PA as many people think. She'll probably win but it will be single digits. Factor in the fact that she forgot to submit a full slate of delegates and they might split the delegates out of the state.
Of course, the media will portray this as a "big win" for Hilldog.
Her campaign will try and frame whatever the next contest is that she is expected to win as the next "big test"...and they will probably succeed.AniHawk said:If she "wins big" here (not in reality, but in media-land), what else do they have to pimp for her? Michigan revote? Puerto Rico? Seems that reality will have to catch up to them eventually.
AniHawk said:If she "wins big" here (not in reality, but in media-land), what else do they have to pimp for her? Michigan revote? Puerto Rico? Seems that reality will have to catch up to them eventually.
After your texas and ohio predictions I am willing to bet the opposite of what you predict will happen sir.Triumph said:I don't think Hillary is going to do as well in PA as many people think. She'll probably win but it will be single digits. Factor in the fact that she forgot to submit a full slate of delegates and they might split the delegates out of the state.
Of course, the media will portray this as a "big win" for Hilldog.
I'm not sure what that is. The ones she's favored in after PA are all pretty small. I expect them to try, but still.human5892 said:Her campaign will try and frame whatever the next contest is that she is expected to win as the next "big test"...and they will probably succeed.
Puerto Rico has over 4 million registered voters, and the state is basically 99.9% democrats (the puerto rico verision of them). A big win there would flip the popular vote totals.GhaleonEB said:I'm not sure what that is. The ones she's favored in after PA are all pretty small. I expect them to try, but still.
I still maintain that Obama would have won Texas outright if the Limbaugh thing hadn't happened. Also would have netted 11 delegates out of Mississippi instead of 5.Cheebs said:After your texas and ohio predictions I am willing to bet the opposite of what you predict will happen sir.![]()
I blame the 3 AM ad more than Limbaugh. But both were the main factors. the only good thing about PA is that PA is closed from republican tampering. But PA is still Ohio on steriods in terms of white blue collar voters and party machine control...Triumph said:I still maintain that Obama would have won Texas outright if the Limbaugh thing hadn't happened.
Piper Az said:While I don't buy Hillary's rhetoric, I find Obama's inability to win big states a bit troubling. I didn't mind CA and NY since those were still the days when Obama was a bit unknown. But now, he's the frontrunner...why isn't he gaining popularity in PA?
Tamanon said:Um, because he just started campaigning there this weekend?
Huge blue collar working class. They remember the Clinton years as good ones, and need a reason to change their view from a known commodity to someone new.Piper Az said:He campaigned hard in OHIO and he still lost by a large margin (nevermind the Republican switchovers). I can blame TX at latinos...
If he can't win PA after giving his all, I would be scratching my head in confusion.
Piper Az said:He campaigned hard in OHIO and he still lost by a large margin (nevermind the Republican switchovers). I can blame TX at latinos...
If he can't win PA after giving his all, I would be scratching my head in confusion.
gcubed said:why? i still dont get this shit that Primary wins = GE wins. PA is a blue state, Obama will win it in the GE.
grandjedi6 said:APF: Not voting gets bundled with the apathetic vote too easily. It's better to vote for a 3rd party or write in a nonsense candidate to show your displeasure
gcubed said:why? i still dont get this shit that Primary wins = GE wins. PA is a blue state, Obama will win it in the GE.
Piper Az said:Who said anything about Primary = GE? The fact that Obama may not win over PA means he can't close the deal. Sure, he may end up with the edge in delegates and win the nomination, but it doesn't mean he is a sure favorite among Democrats.
Piper Az said:Who said anything about Primary = GE? The fact that Obama may not win over PA means he can't close the deal. Sure, he may end up with the edge in delegates and win the nomination, but it doesn't mean he is a sure favorite among Democrats.
typhonsentra said:O'Reilly devoted nearly the full hour to Wright.... again. I wonder how Hannity will cover his.
Atrus said:
:lol OMG, they have the ineffective Powers in for Colmes. This is going to be a massacre.Tamanon said:Hannity spent most of the radio show today on it.
Piper Az said:If, as the poll indicates, that the majority of democrats prefer Obama, tell me why he will have such hard time winning voters in PA? Why is the party still so evenly divided? He will win the nomination, but he will do it no so convincingly. He is the frontrunner but not a strong one. The party is still evenly split between the two camps. Look at John McCain when he became the GOP frontrunner - he had easier time winning states. Same thing cannot be said of Obama - he's still fighting with all he's got. Don't get me wrong; I voted for the dude and suppport him.
AniHawk said:John McCain didn't have an opponent with the name recognition Hillary Clinton has. She was the frontrunner for a long time until people actually started voting.
siamesedreamer said:FOX:
56% of people are less likely to vote for Obama now including 44% of DEMs
I have no idea if that is their own poll or if they are quoting another one...
Piper Az said:If, as the poll indicates, that the majority of democrats prefer Obama, tell me why he will have such hard time winning voters in PA? Why is the party still so evenly divided? He will win the nomination, but he will do it no so convincingly. He is the frontrunner but not a strong one. The party is still evenly split between the two camps. Look at John McCain when he became the GOP frontrunner - he had easier time winning states. Same thing cannot be said of Obama - he's still fighting with all he's got. Don't get me wrong; I voted for the dude and suppport him.
siamesedreamer said:http://media.gallup.com/poll/graphs/031708DailyUpdateGraph1.gif
harSon said:Was posted this morning, 3 pages back. Thanks for the daily Obama doom and gloom though.