CVXFREAK said:Thank the PS2 hardware. I hear the GC one will be on par to the Xbox one and here's hoping.
Hiro_Kunimi_80 said:SCT for Gamecube is the worst version by far
olubode said:Waiting for $20 price point. Thats all the game is worth imo.
shpankey said:I rented it on Xbox and absolutely did not like it at all. It layed around the house for a few weeks while I had it on a game pass at Blockbuster. I kept forcing myself to play it, realizing the whole time I just wasn't having any fun... but for some dumb reason, I kept torturing myself by making myself play. Until I realized, hey, this just isn't a very good game.
It has pretty graphics sure... but bleh to the rest.
Amazing, all of these "pretty graphics" games on Xbox I disliked...
Rainbow Six 3 (dead zone aiming sucked ass)
Splinter Cell: PT
Riddick (<--- this one I *HATED*)
Ninja Gaiden (oh so pretty but oh so unfun)
Brute Force (yaaaaawn)
Otogi 1/2 (wtf is this shit? dumbest fucking game I've seen in awhile)
Deus Ex: Invisible War (complete shit)
Then, I find myself loving games on Xbox with crap graphics...
Obi-Wan (most underrated game this gen)
Indiana Jones and the Emperor's Tomb (has glitches, but it's damn fun)
The Thing (another great game!)
Ghost Recon/Islan Thunder (ugly as sin, but hot damn these games kick fucking ass!)
Crash Bandicoot: The Wrath Of Cortex (man, am I the only human who loved this game?)
Oddworld: Munch's Oddysee (it wasn't great gameplay, but I adored the awesome cutscenes!)
shpankey said:Amazing, all of these "pretty graphics" games on Xbox I disliked...
Then, I find myself loving games on Xbox with crap graphics...
I never wanted any cred with you. Call me when having credibility with you means something.Shogmaster said:I think you just used up all your remaining gaming credibility points with this post.
I am just one of the few people who doesn't give to much credit to a game with great graphics (as most gamers do IMO) and alternatively, don't put a game down early just because the graphics aren't great (which most people also do).The Shadow said:It has nothing to do with graphics. I think you just have crappy taste.
The Shadow said:It has nothing to do with graphics. I think you just have crappy taste.
shpankey said:I never wanted any cred with you. Call me when having credibility with you means something.
shpankey said:I am just one of the few people who doesn't give to much credit to a game with great graphics (as most gamers do IMO) and alternatively, don't put a game down early just because the graphics aren't great (which most people also do).
CVXFREAK said:I thought the Xbox Oddworld got good reviews - a 5/5 by former Extended Play...
The Shadow said:It seemed terribly average to me. I guess I would have liked it more if it had super awesome graphics. (pretend there's a rolleyes icon here)
Regardless, I'll reiterate what I said twice before. It has nothing to do with graphics. He's bagging on games that have great gameplay because they also happen to come with great graphics.
I mean "The Thing" over Deus Ex 2? Please. I bitched and moaned about the over-simplification done to DE2 but even with the consolized version we all saw, it pisses over the shallow and vapid "run and gun" gameplay of the "The Thing"
Just my 2 cents.
shpankey said:You are reading me completely wrong. My whole point in my original post was, that "it has nothing to do with graphics"
I don't understand why you seem to take this so personal. I hated Deus Ex 2 (is this what you're so upset about?). I just didn't dig that kind of gameplay AT ALL. I really digged The Thing. Call it subjectiveness, taste, different styles of gaming or whatever. I am surprised you act so surprised someone could like one game over another. I mean, really... gaming is highly subjective. Tastes differ.
Don't take it so personal bud.![]()
Wario64 said:Score is too high. Splinter Cell sucks
I am just one of the few people who doesn't give to much credit to a game with great graphics (as most gamers do IMO) and alternatively, don't put a game down early just because the graphics aren't great (which most people also do).
CVXFREAK said:Thank the PS2 hardware. I hear the GC one will be on par to the Xbox one and here's hoping.
Wow, nice to see someone have balls enough to admit it. And I agreeWario64 said:Score is too high. Splinter Cell sucks
not the multiplayer.Wario64 said:Score is too high. Splinter Cell sucks
Scrow said:I'm not really interested in Splinter Cell, but how is a score of 8.2 "getting killed"?
For instance, our comparatively lacking hardware
all this us vs them crap is irritating. especially in such a widely read publication/website.It's an unfortunate side effect of our memory card and limited RAM setup. If this lumbering punch to the face weren't enough, our version is plagued by incessant checkpoints, saves, and other level loads.
Scrow said:I'm not really interested in Splinter Cell, but how is a score of 8.2 "getting killed"?
Kuroyume said:Wario Sucks... SC is the best stealth game on any console or PC. I just don't get the criticism in this review. They bitch about more check/save points, but weren't players of the first game bitching about the lack of these things? BLAH
Probably the same way as several games before did it? :\Does anyone know how they pulled off the projected shadows/dynamic flashlights?
Agent Dormer said:Who cares - Ivan wrote the review.
Wario64 said:Splinter Cell sucks
Hiro_Kunimi_80 said:SCT for Gamecube is the worst version by far
HalfPastNoon said:Well, this stealth series far exceeds the shit that is the convoluted and slow pacing MGG series. I remember picking up both the original SC and MGS 2 for the XBOX. I toyed with SC for a bit, then put in MGS. Only MGS went back to the store. Clunky controls, subpar graphics, unrealisistic presentation, and of course, the "story."
Ubi Soft has upped the ante, and Konami and the wannabe movie director Kojima have failed to reach that plateau.