• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Rand Paul blocks Montenegro from joining NATO; McCain: He's "working for Putin"

Status
Not open for further replies.

chadskin

Member
Republican Sen. John McCain slammed his GOP colleague, Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, on Wednesday after Paul blocked the passage of a treaty that would allow Montenegro to move forward with joining NATO, Defense News' Joe Gould reported.

McCain warned before the vote that “If there’s objection, you are achieving the objectives of Vladimir Putin...and I do not say that lightly.”

Paul then entered the Senate chamber, voted against the accession protocol, and exited.

“The only conclusion you can draw when he walks away is he has no argument to be made,” McCain said after Paul walked out abruptly, according to The Washington Examiner. "The senator from Kentucky is now working for Vladimir Putin."

Russian President Vladimir Putin is staunchly opposed to Montengro's accession to NATO, which he views as a threat to Russian sovereignty. Albania and Croatia joined the alliance 2009.
Asked about McCain's comment, Paul stood by his decision to block the treaty and said it would be "unwise to expand the monetary and military obligations of the United States given the burden of our $20 trillion debt."

"Currently, the United States has troops in dozens of countries and is actively fighting in Iraq, Syria, Libya, and Yemen (with the occasional drone strike in Pakistan)," Paul told Business Insider in a statement provided by his office. "In addition, the United States is pledged to defend 28 countries in NATO."
http://www.businessinsider.de/john-...-blocking-montenegro-from-joining-nato-2017-3
 

Ekdrm2d1

Member
Rand Paul blocks Montenegro from joining NATO; McCain: He's "working for Putin"

13940086_l-1024x1024.jpg

.
 

smurfx

get some go again
i like this. i hope republicans keep dragging anybody associating with putin so all the lackeys on trumps side with ties to putin have to quit.
 
Why all the infighting when you are winning and control the board?

It's far easier to stay unified when you are working against a common opponent. Not that the GOP runs the show, every member has a laundry list of things that they have been waiting to accomplish. No one has the same list and some of their wishes directly oppose each other.

You need strong leadership to navigate this sort of situation and they obviously don't have anything even remotely resembling that.
 
I think McCain is pretty off base here, but I think it's irresponsible of Rand Paul to be against new state memberships to NATO on the basis of funding.

why do republicans want to increase military budget but not help anyone?

Well... the US has a pre-existing obligation to NATO so the funding is locked in via international treaties. Opposing new member states to NATO on the basis of American funding is irresponsible.

But, in this case, it's a Republican opposing Montenegro's membership on the basis of not increasing the military budget.
 

Slayven

Member
It's far easier to stay unified when you are working against a common opponent. Not that the GOP runs the show, every member has a laundry list of things that they have been waiting to accomplish. No one has the same list and some of their wishes directly oppose each other.

You need strong leadership to navigate this sort of situation and they obviously don't have anything even remotely resembling that.

So what you saying this is what would have happen if 80s cartoon Cobra had actually won?
 
Was Russia doing the bold meddling it does now under Yeltsin and, crucially, before NATO started expanding eastward"
Just wondering if NATO expansion to defend from Russian hostility is a self fulfilling prophecy.
The Russian government is no champion of freedom or (any) liberal values, but its easy to understand why the Russians are intent on carving out a sphere of influence in Eastern Europe, they were invaded by land twice in the 20th century and probably have siege mentality thats underpinning their foreign policy stance.
 
Was Russia doing the bold meddling it does now under Yeltsin and, crucially, before NATO started expanding eastward"
Just wondering if NATO expansion to defend from Russian hostility is a self fulfilling prophecy.
The Russian government is no champion of freedom or (any) liberal values, but its easy to understand why the Russians are intent on carving out a sphere of influence in Eastern Europe, they were invaded by land twice in the 20th century and probably have siege mentality thats underpinning their foreign policy stance.

ironically, Russia has partnered up with "NATO member" Turkey.
 

Zaru

Member
Breaking news: White american bars negro from entering exclusive club

But seriously that's a lot of bickering over a country of only 600k people.
 

Pedrito

Member
They'll have to tone down the Russia stuff. Blaming everything on Russie (even if it was warranted) will backfire with the populace and it's just inflating Putin's ego.
 
Why all the infighting when you are winning and control the board?

ALso worth remembering that prior to November 2016, every story was about Republican infighting and how the party was falling apart, wouldn't last another decade, would never win elections, etc.

While obviously not all of it was true, a lot of it was. Republican infighting and the divisions in the GOP Are mostly what led to Donald Trump getting the nomination. Without that deep rift between establishment Republicans (McCain) and Tea Party Republicans (Rand, although he's been much more legitimate than most other 2010 Tea Partiers), Trump would have never ridden that populist wave. On the flipside, a mostly cohesive Democratic Party held what many felt to be like a coronation during their primary, and then they ended up getting embarrassed in November.

They'll have to tone down the Russia stuff. Blaming everything on Russie (even if it was warranted) will backfire with the populace and it's just inflating Putin's ego.

Totally agree.
 
They'll have to tone down the Russia stuff. Blaming everything on Russie (even if it was warranted) will backfire with the populace and it's just inflating Putin's ego.

nah, the Western world should not take their eyes off the Mafia State that is Russia
 

antonz

Member
No reason to done anything down. McCain was not accusing Paul of being a KGB operative or anything. He was pointing out the fact that Paul even if for other reasons than Putin's is delivering what Putin wants.

Russia just got caught trying to Kill the current leader and cause a coup to install a Russian Government. So yeah Montenegro is topic of concern. Rand Paul is a piece of shit who thinks even giving a dollar to the poor violates the constitution in some way
 

Kimawolf

Member
They'll have to tone down the Russia stuff. Blaming everything on Russie (even if it was warranted) will backfire with the populace and it's just inflating Putin's ego.

NOPE. that's crap. The bottom line is people need to know just how deep Russia is now tangled with parts of the U.S. government period, end of story. Especially as more and more things come out, its one way to piss off moderate republicans is by "teaming" with Russia.

So i'm all for it.
 

Furyous

Member
why do republicans want to increase military budget but not help anyone?

... And they want tax cuts for the rich. Trumpcare is 500+ billion handout via decrease in taxes to the rich. None of their actions make any sense budget wise:

Less tax revenue from rich people = less money for state and local governments to use
Military spending = an expense

Increasing the military budget and cutting taxes screws America over literally everywhere else pushing us towards another recession. I can wait for all those college students that wanted to make 'Merica great again to get dragged down to earth out of the atmosphere as the realization hits that their futures are fucked job wise. America lost a generation thanks to the great recession and it's looking like it's going to happen again but this time Generation Y gets some of it.

SMH at vetoing this over increasing $20 trillion debt while pushing for tax cuts for rich people that don't pay their fair share of taxes anyway.
 

CHC

Member
Why all the infighting when you are winning and control the board?

Because their only cause for the past 8 years has been whining and blocking everything. It's like the same principle as a group of people pushing with all their energy on a door for hours and hours, the finally just falling all over each other when it finally opens.
 

NervousXtian

Thought Emoji Movie was good. Take that as you will.
McCain's crazy.. but any dig at Paul is good in my book.

Keep on fighting each other.
 
McCain is a jackass with bad policies in his head, but if there's one thing he doesn't fuck around with, it's this nation's sovereignty. I look at this story and feel like he's about one bad day away from spilling everything he knows so far about Trump/Russia.
 

wildfire

Banned
"In addition, the United States is pledged to defend 28 countries in NATO."



If only more people knew we somehow ended up the bigger beneficiary of NATO in the long run thanks to Iraq and Afghanistan and to a lesser extent Kosovo.

Once I saw the receipts I pretty much realized the argument is moot. Yeah we're the backbone and lynchpin of the group but we do squeeze sufficient value out of our partners already.
 

GrapeApes

Member
So as long as Rand Paul is a senator no one can join NATO? Putin probably trying to figure out a way for a Rand Paul presidency.
 
Was Russia doing the bold meddling it does now under Yeltsin and, crucially, before NATO started expanding eastward"
Just wondering if NATO expansion to defend from Russian hostility is a self fulfilling prophecy.
The Russian government is no champion of freedom or (any) liberal values, but its easy to understand why the Russians are intent on carving out a sphere of influence in Eastern Europe, they were invaded by land twice in the 20th century and probably have siege mentality thats underpinning their foreign policy stance.

1101960715_400.jpg


Take a guess.
 

leroidys

Member
This isn't the reasoning he gave, and I don't like Rand Paul, nor am I attempting to explain his decision, but...

Do we really want to add a country to NATO that Russia just tried to initiate a coup in? Some little Yugoslavian dustup between world powers could lead to much larger problems that aren't in the strategic interests of the US.
 

antonz

Member
This isn't the reasoning he gave, and I don't like Rand Paul, nor am I attempting to explain his decision, but...

Do we really want to add a country to NATO that Russia just tried to initiate a coup in? Some little Yugoslavian dustup between world powers could lead to much larger problems that aren't in the strategic interests of the US.

Montenegro has been working towards admission for years now. The fact they finally got to the point they are a viable entrant is exactly why Putin acted. To back down now would just signify Putin can throw a tantrum anytime something is going to happen and we will stop.

I mean that is basically North Korea now. When they are low on food throw a tantrum with their nukes and the world rushes to make them happy until the next tantrum
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom