• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Spider-man 2 first day Steam CCU peaked at 18k

Kenpachii

Member
Is Spiderman 2 a complete new story, or do you need to play the first game and miles morales to understand what goes on?
 
Last edited:

Brakum

Member
Oh no, what a terrible sales performance. How will Sony ever recover from this:

pMctqYk.png
It's in front of games that have been on the list for months and havent come out yet.
 
It's not a terrible result, but compared to the first game, it's not good.
Peak concurrent players is almost 3 times lower. But the most concerning part is that the first game has a Steam user Score of 95%, while Spider-man 2 is at 56%.

mAhxFsE.png
People just know it's a DEI product. It's really sad for the vast majority of people who worked on this game and didn't have an ideological agenda.

And this is a game with a license costing alone 100 million dollars! This should have been the game showing the investors their diversifying strategy was working! This is a way worse disaster than Concord. They won't be able to erase Spider-man from the surface of Earth like they did with Concord.
 

Mr Moose

Member
People just know it's a DEI product. It's really sad for the vast majority of people who worked on this game and didn't have an ideological agenda.

And this is a game with a license costing alone 100 million dollars! This should have been the game showing the investors their diversifying strategy was working! This is a way worse disaster than Concord. They won't be able to erase Spider-man from the surface of Earth like they did with Concord.
The prices Disney charge is fucking stupid.
 
Another Sony failure, one in an ever growing list now.
Deserves Concord numbers, but it is Spider Man so this is as low as that Mega Brand can possibly go, impressive achievement in the negative direction by Sony as typical now.

Complete DEI fest, terrible writing and a literally insane budget which is not sustainable at all short or long term. Add it to the Common Chud victory in the second Year of the Chud 2025.
 

winjer

Member
People just know it's a DEI product. It's really sad for the vast majority of people who worked on this game and didn't have an ideological agenda.

And this is a game with a license costing alone 100 million dollars! This should have been the game showing the investors their diversifying strategy was working! This is a way worse disaster than Concord. They won't be able to erase Spider-man from the surface of Earth like they did with Concord.

Sony already owns the rights for Spider-Man IP. So they are not wasting money.
They would be wasting money, if they weren't making game and movies about it.

Still, this game probably cost around 200 million dollars. So that is a lot of money to get back.
I agree that pushing hard on politics is always a bad decision, as it alienates a chunk of the potential public.
 

Gaiff

SBI’s Resident Gaslighter
Sony already owns the rights for Spider-Man IP. So they are not wasting money.
They would be wasting money, if they weren't making game and movies about it.

Still, this game probably cost around 200 million dollars. So that is a lot of money to get back.
I agree that pushing hard on politics is always a bad decision, as it alienates a chunk of the potential public.
Probably $200M? The Insomniac leak says $315M lol.
 

Mr Moose

Member
Sony already owns the rights for Spider-Man IP. So they are not wasting money.
They would be wasting money, if they weren't making game and movies about it.

Still, this game probably cost around 200 million dollars. So that is a lot of money to get back.
I agree that pushing hard on politics is always a bad decision, as it alienates a chunk of the potential public.
They only own the rights to theatrical releases.
 

Mr Moose

Member
Last edited:

yamaci17

Member
there are other factors why it won't catch up to the 1st game on steam

steam practically destroyed regional pricing in most regions. and for few regions that still have regional pricing, it is not as useful as it used to be. there would be times where games would cost nearly half in certain regions. this allowed more players from those regions to enjoy the game at more reasonable prices.

the game is also released on Epic and we don't have numbers for that platform. funny enough, regional pricing is much better there. many of my friends, as a result, prefer buying the game there now. it is just what it is

so it is possible that the money they earned from 46k CCU was less than what they earn with 20k CCU now. just a guess.
 
Last edited:

NeoIkaruGAF

Gold Member
Anyway, see Sony!? Stop porting your shitty games to PC, they don't appreciate them and it makes people not buy PS5.
I don’t see the causation in here.
PC gamers who don’t like the flagship PS games won’t rush out to buy a PS5 to play those games anyway, right?
Unless you’re implying that by not having those games on PC, PC gamers should be scammed into buying a console they don’t need to play games they won’t like?
On the other hand, why would a PS5 owner wait a full year or more to play a game on PC that they can enjoy today?

If anything, the PC crowd not being interested in PS’s flagship games means PS sales aren’t in danger.
For Sony, it’s win-win. They get the money day 1 from the PS stans, they sell a few more copies on PC with minimal effort, AND they squeeze the console audience twice or thrice with remasters and update patches.
 

MarkyG

Member
Dear god, that's awful! Why on earth do "artists" do this to their work? I honestly don't understand it. It's like they want to make any female look ugly on purpose so that hotblooded young men don't lust after them. It's so bizarre to me. Can't even say it's to resemble the real life counterparts, because it doesn't!

Some people are weird.
 

Topher

Identifies as young
What's holding them back is that those are late or very late ports in genres that don't have that much appeal on PC. Third-person story-driven action games are the biggest on PlayStation. That'd be like taking CPRGs or strategy games, porting them to console a year later and wonder why they aren't selling as much as on PC.

If PlayStation had an RPG (not a JRPG) worth something, it would destroy all their other games on PC. They have two, but they won't port them.

I agree on RPGs. Would help if we had more examples of single player action/adventure games of the same type launching day one. There is Indiana Jones and Hellblade 2, but those are on Game Pass which muddies the waters quite a bit. I don't know. Feel like we don't have enough hard data.
 

phant0m

Member
I hope this is a sign of things to come, wherein Sony just says fuck it and stops porting their single-player games to PC altogether. It was definitely strange how there were zero ads on Steam and no option to pre-order the game until it released. Really half-assed.

Seems like everyone is here is celebrating it doing poorly. You guys will get what you want I suppose
 

Lunareste

Member
I dont get why people are such rabid Sony fanboys.

Make good game = get good sales

Make woke game = get bad sales

In SpiderMan 2's case the year between PS5 and PC release gave gamers plenty of time to discuss the reused assets and unaltered gameplay...and the screenshots of MJ speak for themselves. People don't like ugly characters, even more so when there's an agenda behind it.
 

yogaflame

Member
People nowadays are more aware of woke agenda and more pissed about it. For me it affected the sales. Anyway Sony choose this strategy to port exclusives to Pc, then Sony should just be grateful whatever profit from sales that they get from this.
 
It seems they intentionally and willingly butchered her face. I really want to know: Why? Why is it that you want to make that decision? What is the purpose here? What do you gain by doing this?

You really need to be mentally unstable to confirm this new model or even to propose to use it. I don't and probably won't understand these minds for the rest of my life.
 

RoboFu

One of the green rats
It seems they intentionally and willingly butchered her face. I really want to know: Why? Why is it that you want to make that decision? What is the purpose here? What do you gain by doing this?

You really need to be mentally unstable to confirm this new model or even to propose to use it. I don't and probably won't understand these minds for the rest of my life.
Cause she was too pretty. Can't make women too pretty because then they are objectified, makes ugly women feel bad, and makes money.
 

xenosys

Member
Nah, just my opinion that FF7R should at least be doing comparable to metaphor, they’re both great games in the same genre

Peak CCU's don't always tell the full story.

Here are VII Rebirth's sales estimates after 8 DAYS :

TPDbuRu.jpeg


Here are Metaphor's after 6 WEEKS :

2abr0mG.jpeg

They ARE comparable. In fact, I'd be 99% certain that Rebirth's sales performance after a week was probably a lot stronger than Metaphor's. Given Metaphor wasn't available on something like Gamepass, and wasn't a late port, so Steam was the only way a PC player could play it D1, Rebirth's performance is a lot more impressive.
 
Last edited:

BennyBlanco

aka IMurRIVAL69
Peak CCU's don't always tell the full story.

Here are VII Rebirth's sales estimates after 8 DAYS :

TPDbuRu.jpeg


Here are Metaphor's after 6 WEEKS :

2abr0mG.jpeg

They ARE comparable. In fact, I'd be 99% certain that Rebirth's sales performance after a week was probably a lot stronger than Metaphor's.

These metrics used to be pretty accurate before Valve made everyone’s library private by default. Now they use pretty dubious methods to get the estimates.
 

Gaiff

SBI’s Resident Gaslighter
Peak CCU's don't always tell the full story.

Here are VII Rebirth's sales estimates after 8 DAYS :

TPDbuRu.jpeg


Here are Metaphor's after 6 WEEKS :

2abr0mG.jpeg

They ARE comparable. In fact, I'd be 99% certain that Rebirth's sales performance after a week was probably a lot stronger than Metaphor's. Given Metaphor wasn't available on something like Gamepass, and wasn't a late port, so Steam was the only way a PC player could play it D1, Rebirth's performance is a lot more impressive.
These metrics are wildly off and when I say wildly, I mean sometimes by a factor of 10.
 

xenosys

Member
These metrics are wildly off and when I say wildly, I mean sometimes by a factor of 10.

Yeah, I'm not saying these sales figures are accurate.

If each tracker here is using the same methodology to arrive at their estimates, then their relative performances are comparable, which is the point I was responding to.
 
Last edited:

Brakum

Member
No literally you.
You said action adventures did well on PC and proceeded to list a bunch of rpgs as an example because there is action in those games. It's like me saying point and clicks are one of the most popular genres because plenty of games where you point and click are popular. Fortnite, apex legends, counter strike, valorant.
 
Last edited:
Dear god, that's awful! Why on earth do "artists" do this to their work? I honestly don't understand it. It's like they want to make any female look ugly on purpose so that hotblooded young men don't lust after them. It's so bizarre to me. Can't even say it's to resemble the real life counterparts, because it doesn't!

Some people are weird.

It seems they intentionally and willingly butchered her face. I really want to know: Why? Why is it that you want to make that decision? What is the purpose here? What do you gain by doing this?

You really need to be mentally unstable to confirm this new model or even to propose to use it. I don't and probably won't understand these minds for the rest of my life.

I think it's probably coming down to studio culture - like revealed from Concord info. Some very vocal activists heavily pushed for this, and the rest would be morally inferior if they didn't align themselves with the forced DEI. I don't think everyone agreed with the change, but they probably just had to, to keep their jobs.
 
Last edited:

Hookshot

Member
it's already at 23 thousand player today so I'm going to say it exceeds 40,000 later, based on absolutely nothing(y)
27,775, not even 5,000 more people decided to play it at the same time in the 24 hours (ish) since my post.

Bad game or has Spider-Man's popularity waned?
 
Top Bottom