Oh shit..awesome!Homeland and The Leftovers the same night. TV is finally back.
;((( Aimee ;((((
Co-writing most of the episodes.Is Lindelof writing this?
?Won't be the same without her.
Almost tempted not to watch it
?
She was the most useless character on the show. Her only purpose was, "look cute for Justin."
There are no jogging scenes, Theroux tells TVLine with a laugh. His athletic routine has really taken a dive. No running around.
For his part, Leftovers co-creator Damon Lindelof insists sweatpants-gate has not had any creative impact on the HBO dramas 10-episode second season (premiering Sunday). I can honestly look you in the eyes and say that I have been part of no dong-related conversations ever, he maintains with a bemused grin. Justin is the protector of his own manhood. And if he chooses to flaunt it, then I celebrate that. If he wants to be more discreet about it, then I embrace that as well.
I did not expect it to be a thing, Lindelof adds, and I have no intention of writing towards it this season.
Welp...
The shutdown on "The Leftovers" in the first season, we shut down for two weeks. We reshot half of the fourth episode, and thats the first time that Ive ever done that. And what was amazing about it was we saw the cut for episode four. We felt like we had made a huge storytelling mistake and we shared it with HBO and said, "We would like to fix this." And they agreed and then they allowed us to take the time to basically figure out how to fix it without getting behind on all the scripts that were piling up in the pipeline.
Q: What was the storytelling mistake you made in episode four?
A: Yeah. In episode four, we did a Tom and Christine story where they encountered this soldier who was returning from this war in Yemen, that is happening in the book. And essentially the story was weighted towards the soldier. And it was like, "Oh, this feels like a guest star episode." It's one of those things where your show should always be in service of your main characters, your main crew, and you can kind of always smell like "Oh, this guys only around for this episode." And the actor that we cast, Peter Mark Kendall, who plays Hans on "The Americans," was amazing. But the story was just a bust from the word go. And it was literally half the episode. And so meanwhile the A-story in Mapleton was that the Baby Jesus had been stolen from the manger which was obviously not a hugely pyrotechnic amazing story, but we liked that story and felt that Theroux gave a really strong performance in it. But overall, I thought that if we put this fourth episode on, people will stop watching the show. Because youre still in the first season of a television show, every episodes a date and until you get to like date five or six, any date can be the last date.
[...] its much more difficult, I think, to write and execute stories where theres a lack of cohesion to it. But embedded in your question is the idea of point of view, which is, "Whose eyes am I experiencing this episode through?" As we move forward into season two, the Murphys and the Garveys are all going to be characters in that. But in every episode, (we're) deciding, "Whose point of view am I experiencing this through and can I get even more specific about it?" So if Im going to be bouncing between the Murphy family and the Garvey family, maybe its just Erika and Nora this episode. So unless Erika or Nora is in a scene, we dont see anything else. So were only experiencing Kevin and Jill through the point of view of those two characters. So every episode in season two, we as writers basically decide, "Here are the characters that were experiencing the episode through." It doesnt mean that other characters wont be in it, but lets choose them and be as limited as we can about it. Its always fun to just choose one as we did with Matt and Nora in three and six of last year. But if we can limit it to like three four (characters) max, thats really going to help us with our storytelling, and I think that it has.
The inside joke is to put a disclaimer on the front of every show in the same way that, FX will warn you that theres violence and sexual content before this episode of "Louie" or "Bastard Executioner" saying, "If you are expecting any answers to specifically as it pertains to the Sudden Departure, you will leave this show immensely frustrated." But I think its even more of a "fuck you" to rub it in peoples faces. Were much more interested in the condition of living in a world without answers than we are in providing them. I also think that were playing fair with our storytelling. For example, if one of the characters worked for the X-Files and it was their job to determine the cause of the Sudden Departure like Joe Fiennes on "Flash Forward," its his job to find out what caused the flash forward that's the story telling you, "We are going to answer this." But because all of our characters are resigned to the fact that theyre not going to get an answer, we feel that were playing fair with our storytelling in terms of showing it.
With me, there is no ambiguity as to whether or not the world of the supernatural exists on "The Leftovers." Of course it does.
When we first started talking in the room about saying, "What if Nora puts on a bulletproof vest and hires escorts to shoot her?," it was also, "Thank God Carrie Coon is playing this character, because thats not a great idea, but if we have a great actor representing that idea, it might be cool."
So... Are we officially in no man's land where the book and the show are concerned?
So... Are we officially in no man's land where the book and the show are concerned?
Would I need to watch season 1 to get season 2 of this? I stayed with season 1 for 4 episodes before dropping it because it was so boring and depressing.
It seems to be a soft reboot (sorry Lindelof!) so probably not. It's not particularly story driven so you could probably just read a recap and be okay.
Wow, it's not story driven? I thought that was the main thing with this show. The story and mystery of what happened, etc.
Got a good link to a recap?
Would I need to watch season 1 to get season 2 of this? I stayed with season 1 for 4 episodes before dropping it because it was so boring and depressing.
According to Sepinwall's review, the second season has a different opening sequence and song.
That's nice, I wasn't a fan of the one for the first season.
^^The above interview with Lindelof, I like that they are focusing each episode on a few points of view.
According to Sepinwall's review, the second season has a different opening sequence and song.
That's nice, I wasn't a fan of the one for the first season.
It's not story driven at all. The showrunner has even gone on record saying that none of the mysteries will ever be solved (or at least the central mystery of what the Great Departure is will never be solved) - it's a pure character study.