Support NeoGAF

[Kotaro]

I used the word 'intrigued' instead of 'excited', because not much have been shown for both games

 

[SJRB]

I rate them both a wholehearted "We'll see" / 10

 

[Laptop1991]

Both, i'm not choosing just one until i see more about them.

 

[Pakoe]

Dawnwalker since its a new IP. Trailer looked cool.

 

[CompleteGlobalSaturation]

Never really cared about The Witcher, and I won't start now.

Dawnwalker looks more interesting.

 

[winjer]

Dawnwalker seems to be a lot more interesting.

 

[vaibhavpisal]

Witcher 4.

That other game has CDPR devs but not the funding I presume. CDPR has spend a good amount of time refining their formula so am expecting it to be solid at the very least.

 

[RoadHazard]

I don't even know what the second one is, so.

 

[The Cockatrice]

Witcher ofc. The other one will prolly be below mid.

 

[Valt7786]

I mean, so far one is gonna be "Witcher 3 but with Ciri" which I'm down for. The other looks like "Witcher 3 but with more Vampires" which I am also cautiously optimistic for.

 

[Dr.Morris79]

Dawnwalker since its a new IP. Trailer looked cool.

A wholeheartedly this.

 

[Husky]

I'm invested enough in the world of The Witcher to feel more eager for The Witcher 4. Maybe when they've both had proper gameplay reveals, my feelings will change. I don't really care about cinematic trailers.

 

[Zathalus]

Witcher 4 is from the same studio, lots of people have left, but plenty that worked on the Witcher 3 are still there. Dawnwalker has some of the talent that left CDPR over the few years, but plenty of bad games about that shows that doesn’t always work.

I’m hopeful for both, two great RPGs are better than one, or no great RPGs.

 

[Kurotri]

Gotta go with Dawnwalker. You can already kind of infer how Witcher 4 will be since it's a sequel, but Dawnwalker is fresh and tries some things that I find interesting like the time limit. They also plan it to be a whole saga, so there's a whole lot of lore and stuff that I want to dive into.

 

[Tertullian]

I don't really find either intriguing to be honest. Obviously I don't want whatever modern CDPR is slopping out, but I honestly thought the Dawnwalker trailer was kind of silly and nonsensical.

 

[Hollowpoint5557]

Witcher 3/10hype
Dawnwalker 4/10 hype

 

[Fbh]

Dawnwalker mostly because it's a new IP with a lot of key talent from The Witcher 3 involved.

 

[Schmendrick]

It´s a "we`ll see" for both.
But they are both firmly on my radar.

 

[Drake]

Dawnwalker. I have no interest in a Witcher game without Geralt.

 

[pudel]

Witcher4...no doubt! I am a little fanboy for this series. If they fck it up somehow...i can still moan about it. But all these based judgements right now are too early for me.

 

[Fake]

Witcher 1 remake.

 

[Aion002]

TW4.... The other one I have to see a lot more.

 

[freemandos]

I'm not sure. I mean we have seen so little at the moment. Maybe Dawnwalker for being a new IP, despite loving previous The Witcher games. I need to see more of both anyway.

 

[Exentryk]

Witcher 4 since it's a followup to the greatest game ever made. Really intrigued about how Ciri loses her powers and how she goes through the trials. Hopefully story is captivating and has a good hook like TW3 had (finding Ciri).

Dawnwalker looks interesting mainly cause it has some TW3 devs, but I'm not a fan of vampires as the protagonist. There are also unknowns about budget, execution, etc., so it might not turn out into a cohesive project. Let's see.

 

[viveks86]

Very excited for both, but I'll vote the Witcher 4 as the studio is a known quantity. Rebel Wolves has the DNA to make a banger, but will everything come together as envisioned? As a brand new team, they have a lot to prove before being compared with some of the best in the industry.

 

[pudel]

I have no interest in a Witcher game without Geralt.

Who says that the game will be without Geralt?

 

[Bernardougf]

Witcher 4 with Ciri as the lead has me with zero to no interest ... the other game I never heard about it.

Im hoping for a good remake of the witcher 1 though

 

[BennyBlanco]

Dawnwalker. Getting Namco to publish was huge. Usually these studios with veteran talent struggle to find publishers then peter out. Namco will give them a juicy budget and they may have lost FromSOFT.

 

[DAHGAMING]

Both but in different ways. The Witcher 4 as I love 3, but Dawnwalker as its new and has them ex CDPR mandem making it, plus that trailer give me them Witcher 3 feelings.

 

[Bartski]

It's a blind bet right now but I'll go with Witcher 4. I hope Dawnwalker ends up great but it's made by team with no track record except both directors in chafrge and less than a half of CDPRs manpower behind it.

 

[mdkirby]

I’m sure I’ll have fun with Witcher 4, but blood of the dawn walker looks refreshing and more interesting

 

[GymWolf]

Dawnwalker new ip, althought the game seems smaller in scope and i need to know more about the 30 days limit.

Also, i can't stress enough how much i don't give a fuck about cirilla as a character.

 

[Vlodril]

Both. We have seen 0 gameplay from both.

 

[Nickolaidas]

The not-woke one.

 

[fart town usa]

Never really cared about The Witcher, and I won't start now.

Dawnwalker looks more interesting.

Same for me.

 

[Wolves hunt in packs]

The Witcher 4 i kinda know what i will get, and it will be glorious.

Dawnwalker i have no clue how's the gameplay going to be, hopefully something like TW, so yeah i'm more curious about Dawnwalker but for now have total faith in TW4.

 

[MagiusNecros]

Vampire game. Trailer sets the stage and got me hyped.

Witcher 4 doesn't tell me anything about it's plot and is just Lore Breaking Ciri is here. Would rather play as Triss Merigold.