shoplifter said:I'd honestly prefer 30, but I can live with 60.
(argh!! timer got me during THIS post!)
neptunes said:can they make it 30 seconds?
Very true.Hamfam said:People should be spending at-least 60 seconds reading the post/topic their replying to, thinking about their reply, and typing it anyway.
19 gets my vote...Seth C said:I vote for 45.
Willco said:30 would be nice, but 60 is fine. If it helps sift the idiotic posts from decent ones, I'm all for it.
Reply... then hit reply again... and keep hitting reply until you reply. Easy way to be a post whore, but a bad way to be a post whore.Ryck said:I honestly didn't realize there was one ...........how do you post that fast anyway?
GuntherBait said:Reply... then hit reply again... and keep hitting reply until you reply. Easy way to be a post whore, but a bad way to be a post whore.![]()
So why are you here again?yoshifumi said:most of my posts are pretty pointless, so i guess i have a problem with it. but then again i imagine things would be worse without it.
HalfPastNoon said:I don't like you.
GuntherBait said:So why are you here again?![]()
we need quality people like that.... specially you.yoshifumi said:i'm a seat filler.
GuntherBait said:So why are you here again?![]()
Wellington said:No.
EFWIS
TPIWWP!Wario64 said:Every fucking week I swear
SickBoy said:What is the time limit?
If its main achievement is some reduction in posts that consist solely of:
"IAWTP" or "" or "
"
...then I'm all for it.
-SB
I bet some bitch uniformed in monkey feathers fucked mom up in the attic?Ninja Scooter said:IBSBUMFFMUTA
Society said:I think the 60sec on searches it way too long.