With the exception of HDR, the OP's features are quite literally automatically supported if the game isn't programmed by monkies. Using standard resolution and frame tick implementations, you really have to go out of our way not to support unlocked framerates and arbitrary resolutions and aspect ratios in 2025.
I'd say that physics and such not being tied to the frame rate should be a bare minimum thing. Then being able to offer the 120-480 frame limits is just as easy as having the selection between 30 and 60.
Or, like most people, you can't afford to upgrade to a new monitor. Or you don't need to for the games you play.
Barely anyone use that, it's not basic at all.
Well, it depends on engines design, some break the logic at some point which is why it's better to rely on FG for such a high frame rate.
Not all games are built equal. Besides, hating on HUD is a very nice thing, most people don't care or prefer to have it, I'm one of those, they're games after all.
Well, TAA is complicated to allow disabling since many effects are designed around it these days, but yeah, those effects should be optional considering there's people that really hate them. I rather keep them for artist vision sake, except for chromatic aberration, that thing is the most useless glitch ever. I'd add the effect of eyes getting used to light when coming out of caves or dark zones, I hate it so much, it's stupid and only makes my eyes hurt, I even developed an habit of closing my eyes while tilting my head a little in those sections, it's literally muscular memory already.
Proper HDR is hard and not very used por popular, I don't use it on games because it sucks balls on PC, I'll probably give it a better chance on Switch 2.
Dude
The fuck?
Tried a 42" and 48" TV and wasn't for meUmm.... no it doesn't huge difference.
Visual TV Size Comparison : 49 inch 21x9 display vs 65 inch 16x9 display
Visual size comparison of a 49 inch 21x9 display vs 65 inch 16x9 displaywww.displaywars.com
even putting your 45" ultra wide up to m y 48" monitor. I can make my monitor display yours at actual size but you can not do the same with mine.
they are super dumb.
Seems reasonable? You want the bare minimum to be 240 support?
I didn't realize OP was talking about unlocked FPS on PC. I thought he meant a 120 FPS minimum across the board, even on consoles. That'd be nice, sure, but let's be real, totally unrealistic
You and OP should get in to a room together and conjure up more stupid thoughts.
Switch 1 have button remapping btw. I'm using it for some games, but alas, they are not embeded to each game, unfortunately. I have to change to default manually if my switch are used by other people in my place.
Wanna something? Do it yourself. Devs don't really own you anything. You can skip games if you think they underdeliver features.
And a lot of testing, balancing, adjusting game design/engine etc before/after that
At your own risk that something will break or work incorrectly
![L*][*N*K](/data/avatars/m/842/842515.jpg?1744192062){kind=avatar}
Legit I don't know what most of these things are
"Ignorance is bliss."Legit I don't know what most of these things are
It's extremely rare something break for ultrawide mods. I only ever saw some emulated games (Metroid Primes) missing geometry and textures on the extreme left and right borders in cutscenes. Very ease for devs to check.
I see you wanted the bare minimum there, too
