IT review thread (RT 91%)

I am legitimately surprised by the good reviews. Maybe I should stop being such a cynic.

Never would've thought this would be above 90% on RT.
 
I'm literally just coming off listening to the audiobook. I feel the books do give IT a personality as multiple times during '58 it shows human emotions such as anger and fear. The Bev bathroom incident feels like an angry response to IT missing Bill and Richie at Neibolt Street.

It's also worth mentioning too that due to the way the book interweaves the adult sequences that IT ends up talking a lot throughout the book. While it is true IT is more talkative in the second half, maybe they should have interjected some of that during the children segments.


This is patently false. The entire circus in 1985 is because
IT wants revenge from 1958.
I felt that IT's "personality" and emotions came across in the same way that a male lion will kill cubs to take over a pride or dog will bear teeth and snarl aggrssively. There are emotions, but they're base, instinctive, animalistic, and inhuman, the emotions from the perspective of something that doesnt see the world like we do. Causing fear salts the meat, hunger drives it. If the prey isn't as fearful, if now hunting is disrupted, something is wrong, the predator reacts and remembers.
 
It's pretty hilarious that across all the reviews Bill Skarsgards' Pennywise is being praised when most people were so sure he was gonna suck after seeing the first images

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1245900

You can only respond to what is being shown. They chose to put out shitty pictures of him looking like a try-hard super villain, and a lot of people didn't dig it. Of course, the moral is to not write off an entire movie based on some stills. But, there's also no problem with judging those stills at the time.
 
The rotten review gives it 3/5 and is more 'meh' than negative. I dunno what dictates a miss for RT but guessing 60% is rotten now?
 
The rotten review gives it 3/5 and is more 'meh' than negative. I dunno what dictates a miss for RT but guessing 60% is rotten now?

If my memory's correct, the critics choose whether or not their review is considered rotten or fresh on RT. RT is only supposed to supply the tomato rating on their own when a critic doesn't get back to them in time.
 
If my memory's correct, the critics choose whether or not their review is considered rotten or fresh on RT. RT is only supposed to supply the tomato rating on their own when a critic doesn't get back to them in time.

Ah...
Weird the same critic awarded the film 3/5. I'd consider that a reasonably ok score.
 
I felt that IT's "personality" and emotions came across in the same way that a male lion will kill cubs to take over a pride or dog will bear teeth and snarl aggrssively. There are emotions, but they're base, instinctive, animalistic, and inhuman, the emotions from the perspective of something that doesnt see the world like we do. Causing fear salts the meat, hunger drives it. If the prey isn't as fearful, if now hunting is disrupted, something is wrong, the predator reacts and remembers.

Well are we talking about the adult or child segments? In the child segments, IT is definitely more bestial but it does have flashes of being a bit petty and calculating such as during Bev's segments (bathroom and final father chapter) and the short part that from IT's viewpoint.

In the adult parts, IT has an established personality. IT's also more talkative in the later years as well.
 
Ah man I love Grace, glad she liked it.

Me too! She puts out so much good content/analyses. Though her opinions can be really whacky sometimes, I love how much thought she puts into stuff.

I'm definitely going to go see this Thursday night instead of waiting for the weekend.
 
Carrie better than Shawshank or Green Mile? In what aspects?

Yeah Carrie isn't as good imo. I could see arguments for Misery, Dolores Clairborne, or Stand by Me to be included but that's it. A lot of the 80's movies that were made were good but not great (Dark Half, Firestarter, Cujo, etc)

If the original Carrie was timeless I don't think they would have made a remake. Its been probably 15 years since I have seen it though.

Shawshank will never be remade because i don't think you could do it any better, same with Green Mile.
 
You can only respond to what is being shown. They chose to put out shitty pictures of him looking like a try-hard super villain, and a lot of people didn't dig it. Of course, the moral is to not write off an entire movie based on some stills. But, there's also no problem with judging those stills at the time.
That's what I'm saying, people were quick to brush off this movie after seeing the first press images of Pennywise.
 
Me too! She puts out so much good content/analyses. Though her opinions can be really whacky sometimes, I love how much thought she puts into stuff.

I'm definitely going to go see this Thursday night instead of waiting for the weekend.

I agree, I think she's maybe a tad hyperbole sometimes but overall we have the same tastes, so I trust her.

I have to wait till tuesday :( going with a group of 12 though, should be fun!
 
Sorry, you seem to have misspelt Misery, Carrie and The Dead Zone there.




;)

I can see some people liking Misery more, its a different tone of a movie. Carrie though... I don't see how anyone can think that it is as timeless and stands up as quality as well as Shawshank or the Green Mile, or even Misery.

I've actually never seen TDZ so I cant comment on that one. I thought the book was just OK but its been 16ish years when I read it around when I was 18ish.
 
This may seem petty; but could we keep the review scores out of the thread title?

I was hoping to go into the movie without any expectations but the thread title kind of ruined that.
 
I can see some people liking Misery more, its a different tone of a movie. Carrie though... I don't see how anyone can think that it is as timeless and stands up as quality as well as Shawshank or the Green Mile, or even Misery.

I've actually never seen TDZ so I cant comment on that one. I thought the book was just OK but its been 16ish years when I read it around when I was 18ish.

Hah, no worries. I was only really pulling your leg. The three you mentioned really are timeless classics and will hold up for decades to come. I just think that King movies get a hard time in general, I could rhyme off loads that I've loved. Although there are loads of stinkers too!
 
This may seem petty; but could we keep the review scores out of the thread title?

I was hoping to go into the movie without any expectations but the thread title kind of ruined that.

you're in control of your own expectations though.

You haven't even read any of the reviews.

Its just a number.
 
This may seem petty; but could we keep the review scores out of the thread title?

I was hoping to go into the movie without any expectations but the thread title kind of ruined that.

I mean ... you don't want to know if it's good or not? Seems a bit odd.

Hoping for something like 190/10 ratio for a final 95% rating.

47/2 atm.
 
Grace's (Beyond the Trailer) review: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGOfNmxXYoM

She loved it!

What in the flying fuck is that video composition. Her low-quality 30$-webcam-footage is floating awkwardly in the middle of the right side, random pictures of the movie are overlayed at different parts of the picture without any rhyme or reason while there is a weird, useless static picture in the lower right with weirdly overlayed picture of a baloon on top.

You have up to 100K views per video. At least put some effort into your videos, jesus.

This may seem petty; but could we keep the review scores out of the thread title?

I was hoping to go into the movie without any expectations but the thread title kind of ruined that.

If you consider "the movie's good" a spoiler, then whoooo boy, I'm afraid you're already lost.
 
This may seem petty; but could we keep the review scores out of the thread title?

I was hoping to go into the movie without any expectations but the thread title kind of ruined that.

It won't be updated with every tick and twitch, but it's a relevant piece of information that a large hunk of people are interested in that also fits in the title.

Sorry, but "It's getting good reviews" is not a spoiler. Personally, while I read a half dozen blurbs on RT, I'm not going to read any reviews until after I've seen it. And within that selection of blurbs, they disagreed about what the film's strengths and weaknesses were. All the number tells you is, people generally recommend seeing it. They don't even agree on why.
 
Hah, no worries. I was only really pulling your leg. The three you mentioned really are timeless classics and will hold up for decades to come. I just think that King movies get a hard time in general, I could rhyme off loads that I've loved. Although there are loads of stinkers too!

Ha I feel ya. King movies do get a bad rap at times but I think a lot of it is due to them being known more for the stinkers than the good ones. Almost no one outside of King fans even realize that Shawshank and Green Mile are even King movies, same with Stand by Me, Misery and Dolores to a smaller extent.
 
Nice reviews, it'll probably drop thanks to that 72 metacritic score, but this has a chance of opening to 70m+. I'm officially on the hype train.
 
96%

48 fresh. 2 rotten.

Critic Consensus: Well-acted and fiendishly frightening with an emotionally affecting story at its core, It amplifies the horror in Stephen King's classic story without losing touch with its heart.
 
Sooooo happy this is reviewing well!! I'll be seeing this multiple times in the theater. This is going to go down as a classic
 
I know this is a dumb post but it's really annoying when someone makes a Metacritic/RT thread and doesn't post the links. Don't make me search for that shit dawg.
 
Never skip any horror movie that gets rated fresh.

Loads of great horror movies fail to get rated fresh, so don't write anything off that fails to meet that bar, but whatever you do, no matter the film, if a horror movie hits fresh, you have to go see it.

This has never let me down.
 
Top Bottom