Raven117
Member
This is just reality. Rolex has long LONG since forsaken their "tool" watch origins. Yuppies like to say that their Rolex has all this functionality (and, they do), but very VERY few are using them for their original built purpose. For most people treating a 10K-15K (retail) jewelry piece is either (i) incredibly stupid because 10K is a nice little chunk of money for most people, or (ii) you are a complete douche treating your 10K piece of jewelry like shit because 10K is, in fact, nothing to you. (Don't get me wrong, there are some awesome Rolex pieces).I don't wear Rolex as a beater. To the pool/hot tub to impress the ladies is one thing, but if I KNOW I'm gonna be sticking my hand into a nest of iron pipes and concrete or working with power tools, I wear a cheap watch that can get scuffed or scratched, pop a strap pin and fall off, whatever, and I won't cry (much) about it. But if I drag a rolex across concrete.....no way. Despite their origins as tough and reliable tool watches, Rolex has loooooooong since past that by just due to the economics of fixing anything.
Tudor....maybe. I would wear a Pelagos or FXD to go diving, which I wouldn't do with ANY Submariner. A. you don't need that type of dive watch anymore, B. there are 'as good' options, and C. good luck getting it fixed/repaired in a reasonable amount of time or cost.
Specifically with "divers", anyone scuba diving is using a dive computer. And, if I know Im going to absolutely beat the fuck out of my arm doing something, Im strapping on my G-Shock Rangeman (but most G-Shocks will do). Its more accurate, tougher, and has better functionality and features than any mechanical watch. (But its not jewelry).
Tudor is definitely closer to what Rolex started doing with their sports watches in the 50s. That Black Bay 58, specifically, is quite good, but then you run into other issues. Namely, they still aren't cheap, there are better tools out there, and some idiots (not that it should matter, but, it does to at least a little extent), think its just someone who wanted a Rolex, but couldn't afford it.
(And, if one is choosing a watch to try and pick up women with it....LOL, that's beyond silly. I would be very wary of any women that is attracted to a person just because they have a Rolex (and there are way better and more expensive watches out there) strapped to their wrist. BUT, that said, if it gives a person more confidence, then that may matter. )
If you are "damn nearly destitute", then why are you wanting to buy a watch at all?I don't want a Rolex. I'm damn nearly destitute. Im not trying to look like I have money. If I had money sure I'd buy one but owning one would make me feel like a fraud.
If this is truly the case, but you still just want a watch, then consider
a Tissot PRX,
a Seiko Turtle Diver,
a Seiko 5, or
a Casio "Oak" GMB2100SD-1A (if you have a bigger wrist), or a Casio GST-B600D-1A (if you want something smaller).
OR, if you want to look a big hipster, a
G-Shock GWM5610-1,
or even cheaper hipster, the Casio F91w.
[h3][/h3]
Last edited: