Black Mamba
Member
Lakers playing a zone for the 1st time I can ever remember.
Yeah, they have no idea how to do so.
Yeah, they have no idea how to do so.
WolstatSun said:With the season done, my call is the Raptors trade the pick if they don't move up from 7 or 8.
I like around 20-25 guys in this draft, just not sure anyone other than Davis is worth a top 3 pick. I think Beal could maybe be an all-star, Drummond could in like 6 years, and MKG could if he learns how to shoot and doesn't die in the NBA, and Robinson is good, but I don't think those guys are top 3 level.
How so? It's only odds. They could still get a top 3 pick. It just would guarantee they would be trying.
I don't care that much for the top aside from Davis but there's a lot of talent in the first round. Maybe only one or two franchise guys but a whole bunch of potential impact starters/fringe all-star players.
I like Valanciunas a lot, but he's not making the Raptors contenders for the playoffs in the next two years so that would be a pretty bad move. Then again, just some random reporter, but their coach seems pretty focused on getting to the playoffs next year as well. Their talent level isn't good enough for it though.
SHAMEBALL HIGHLIGHT OF THE FOREVER
God Damn that Tarzan soundtrack is amazing
Can't get enough of Phil Collins
What happened, I'm in class =l
Cats trying is straight trash. All that arrangement will do is make teams like Nola and Sac be more strategetic with their tanking and it would screw legit shit teams by making it less likely to get the best players. I have no problem with teams tanking as is, cause the teams that are truly aren't going anywhere.
The only kind of tanking that needs to be fixed is The Spurs tanking for Duncan type tanks.
hmmm, what are your thoughts on who some of those franchise guys later in the first round are?
Frankly ive only really payed attention to the guy projected to go in the first 13 picks and some of them only very minimally.
Would be hard to be strategic there.
And I'm fine with "screwing" the worst of the worst. The draft is supposed to be a good chance to help bad teams, but no one says it has to help the worst teams. Let shitty run teams rot.
I meant only a franchise guy or two in the whole first round (Davis and maybe one of those other Top 5 guys like Beal or someone).
I think it'll be a less top heavy version of the 2008 draft.
Murphy is The Lakers leading scorer.
Troy Murphy.
Murphy is The Lakers leading scorer.
Troy Murphy.
Such a dumb statement.
Such a dumb statement.
Why? Why should the worst team in the league have the best odds for the 1st pick? Let it be the 4th worst team. A team that's bad but not fucking trash.
That was such a Lakers-fan statement to make.
Again, a dumb statement.
Why 4th? why randomly choose 4th? lets use other dumb metrics.
Team with the worst crowd attendance! no no, team with the best cheer leaders!
The point of a draft based on your record is to make sure talent goes to where its needed the most to try and make sure every team in the league has a chance of being relevant. The lotto is designed to try and discourage shameless tanking.
If you want to be picky, it's the second part of that, that is broken, not the first.
The worst team in the league should get the most talent.
How do you stop tanking without also stopping the reward for the worst of the worst?
How do you stop tanking without also stopping the reward for the worst of the worst?
How do you stop tanking without also stopping the reward for the worst of the worst?
4th is arbitrary, but it feels like a good position to start from. And the only metric i used was wins...
Re: bold - yes, but the problem is teams TANK which means this isn't what actually happens. And again, the worst records would still have a shot at a top 3 pick. Just a lesser shot.
You can't stop tanking....without it being unfair to legit shitty teams...like the Bobcats.
Hell this league has too many shit teams as it is. The market on star level talent is small and a team won't be shit until they get a star.
If anything the Lottery system is broken in a sense that the worst team often gets shafted.
I don't remember the last worst team that got the best pick. The Cavs got Kyrie with the Clippers pick.
So basically, fuck teams that have no talent, yall should never get the best player?
Then you'll have retarded tanking strats based on people trying to make sure they have the highest lotto win % for the 4th pick instead of the first. It won't prevent teams from throwing games. Lots of games.
Maybe they should just get rid of the draft entirely. Anyone over 19 can go wherever they want (and get the contract they want, no restrictions). The basketball draft just isn't working.
Maybe they should just get rid of the draft entirely. Anyone over 19 can go wherever they want (and get the contract they want, no restrictions). The basketball draft just isn't working.
That would suck so so so so much.
The Cats weren't tanking, I mean they lost 13 more games than the next worst team, they suck. Wiz went on a 6 game winning streak.
Cavs legit suck, Nola didnt tank they have a bunch of d leaguers and Gordan was injured most of the year. Sac is a party platter of potential but no current talent outside of DMC. Nets are ass and are losing DWill, so will suck harder next year, raps are ass.
I mean, god, why reward Raps and not Bobcats, you can't cite poor management, they've both been poorly managed and it could be argued that the cats are better managed, same goes for the nets.
Morey the Wizard at work.Rockets fans,tell Goran Dragic how much U want him 2extend his time with Hou. I will get your message 2him. Hash tag #HouLovesGogi in reply
No way, lol. He hops to have a thousand by Saturday. It might really be D Rose then. Adidas probably pushed him to it.
Do you know how fucking hard that would be. Stop and think for once.
The Bobcats would still be guaranteed a top 4 pick...in no way am I saying for them to get the 14th.
The Cats wouldn't have let Diaw go if they weren't tanking. Cavs would have won more games and would Nola without a tank. They sat Kaman for no reason as well as others. Nets sat DWILL.
Why reward putting out the worst possible product? I'm not saying to hurt them, but give more incentive to win. And again, Bobcats are an outlier. To design a system around an outlier is near-sighted.
I did, i'm replying to someone who obviously isn't thinking about what they're posting, but they had a thought, so put it on the internet for all to see.
This is why i don't bother replying to a lot of your shit. You don't ever want to discuss what you post, your idea is dumb, it's flawed, goes against the nature of what a draft is and the whole purpose of a draft.
Everyones thinking it, i'm one of the few pointing it out.
But i'm done with it.
Go be free.
There's no future in Diaw, DWill played in tons of losses and is gone next year. Nola seems like the only team with a decent roster who are bottom of the barrel.
Maybe do Worst team gets best odds of #1 and give 2-6 an additional first round pick thats untradeable.
I would say Nola is more of an outlier than The Cats.
HmmNo way, lol. He hops to have a thousand by Saturday. It might really be D Rose then. Adidas probably pushed him to it.
Hell yeah, one of my fav Disney soundtracks. The end of Son of a Man with Tarzan going batshit insane on the vines sent chills down my spine as a kid, and still do!
But we also could've played Varejao shortly after the All-Star break.Cavs legit suck