BMI is more or less a height to weight ratio right? So it wouldn't take into account your natural skeletal frame type or the amount of muscle mass / fat you've put onto that frame?
I really don't think any medical associations should give two shits about weather or not obesity is a disease and focus on curing shit like Cancer.
Here's the difference...
Cancer
"I've got some bad news Mrs Jones, you've been diagnosed with Cancer. You're going to need to undergo radiation therapy. You'll lose your hair, lose a lot of weight, feel extremely weak and generally be living in a hellish nausea until this is over and you might not survive regardless."
Obesity
"I've got some bad news Mrs Jones, you've got the obesity. The good news is you can avoid getting diabetes, having limbs amputated and dying and early death by simply eating more natural unprocessed and healthy foods, start exercising and being more active. The choice is yours."
There are different diseases that are not as fatal as cancer, so...
20-30 lbs of muscle is a lot on a skinny guy. You would look totally different, though the greatest benefit would probably be shopping for clothes being easier. And yeah, it just takes good lifting and right nutrition. A lot of people who don't lift assume you have to work out a ton, but for building you shouldn't be taking much time at all.Yeah, I've been thinking a lot about lifting recently. Hate being skinny. Just don't know where to start. People keep talking about PX90 or other hardcore stuff like that, but I don't necessarily want to go that far into gaining muscles. Isn't simple lifting and good nutrition just enough to gain an extra 20-30 pounds?
Obviously there are other diseases besides cancers, the point is that Obesity as a disease is a bit of a joke since if somebody is obese they can almost certainly fix themselves.
I just hate to think that by making obesity and official disease the attitudes surrounding it are going to be more sympathetic.
20-30 lbs of muscle is a lot on a skinny guy. You would look totally different, though the greatest benefit would probably be shopping for clothes being easier. And yeah, it just takes good lifting and right nutrition. A lot of people who don't lift assume you have to work out a ton, but for building you shouldn't be taking much time at all.
The key is working enough things at once hard enough that you trigger your body to develop overall. Starting Strength by Mark Rippetoe is an old classic that will teach you the basics of what to start with and why, how to have proper form to avoid injuries, and just offer good encouragement. If you don't have barbell stuff available to you yet, pullups, pushups and squats can go pretty far, but it's much harder to build a solid core without lifting.
The bigger challenge for me is not being put off from the whole scene by all the blatant self-esteem issues motivating most people. Their motivation is what other people think so they just blab on and on with that philosophy that is driving them and it's so annoying. I am well past caring what anyone thinks of me, and I just want to do it for the sake of health and strength in itself. I also have a bum knee injury to worry about, but that's just me.
Working out you will get much hungrier. I know I have. Just make sure you're getting the protein you need and then you'll probably be hungry enough and have no difficulty finding the carbs you need. For that protein, supplement powder is way cheaper than steaks and such, just don't get caught up in more expensive special blend formulas (you can make your own using fruit and whatnot) and check amazon for the basic additive because they have stuff hella cheap.Yeah, thanks for the tips. I guess I should also eat bigger portions during my meals, but being skinny, I don't have a huge stomach, so it doesn't take much before i'm stuffed. I can't eat as much as the 200 lbs guy next to me. =/ I guess it will probably get easier as I slowly gain weight.
No kidding!... I'm 6 feet 1 inches, 27 years old, and 225 lb. My BMI says 29 (just shy of obese). Yet I am actually quite in shape and basically skinny. What idiot came up with the BMI?
If a BMI of 30 or more = Obese, and we're using that in our statistics, then I think our statistics are pretty skewed. Many people with a high BMI (of 30 or more) are actually quite healthy, and many people with a low BMI have numerous health issues. We need a better metric for this.
Weight alone is not a reliable indicator of overall health.
No kidding!... I'm 6 feet 1 inches, 27 years old, and 225 lb. My BMI says 29 (just shy of obese). Yet I am actually quite in shape and basically skinny. What idiot came up with the BMI?
ITT a bunch of internet experts decide what a disease is, not the professionals.
I can see how people will "abuse" this. But the main point of this now will allow more focus towards the condition, and better education, research, and treatment. This doesn't mean everyone will start getting a gastric bypass.
Being that it's cancer, yes?Should lung cancer be a disease?
BMI is more or less a height to weight ratio right? So it wouldn't take into account your natural skeletal frame type or the amount of muscle mass / fat you've put onto that frame?
I really don't think any medical associations should give two shits about weather or not obesity is a disease and focus on curing shit like Cancer.
Here's the difference...
Cancer
"I've got some bad news Mrs Jones, you've been diagnosed with Cancer. You're going to need to undergo radiation therapy. You'll lose your hair, lose a lot of weight, feel extremely weak and generally be living in a hellish nausea until this is over and you might not survive regardless."
Obesity
"I've got some bad news Mrs Jones, you've got the obesity. The good news is you can avoid getting diabetes, having limbs amputated and dying and early death by simply eating more natural unprocessed and healthy foods, start exercising and being more active. The choice is yours."
Eh, alcoholism/addiction is considered a disease.While we're at it, let's call alcoholism a disease as well.
How is it a disease, how many obese people actually have some kind of glandular problem that causes them to gain weight or waterweight no matter if they eat properly?
Being that it's cancer, yes?
While we're at it, let's call alcoholism a disease as well.
Because it is a lifestyle choice that could be avoided if not lazy/uneducated/born into shitty house with shitty diet. Disease is something you generally get involuntatarily. I do not agree wth these new classificartion.
Such a strawman.
Not all diseases are equal. Obesity is a lifestyle disease and needs to be considered seriously because it does pose a significant problem (causing: "Diabetes, High Blood Pressure, Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Vascular Disease, Heart attack, stroke, and even cancer") yet nothing is done about. People need to get over this 'be strong, fix it yourself!' mentality and realize that when 1/3 of a population is suffering from something that will give them long term health problems, then the community needs to come together to seriously consider causes and solutions.
Then why not spend money towards curing a societal problem? No more of this deflecting the blame; the root cause is that we are a sedentary society that promotes consumption of unhealthy food. People have the freedom to make choices, and we have the freedom to provide people choices, but we also have the freedom to influence people to make the right choice. I'm not advocating for shutting down all McDonald's everywhere, but the FLOTUS is on the right track in that we need to focus on improving nutrition and emphasizing the importance of balancing macromolecules and encouraging physical activity. Require businesses that require little to no activity to have a company gym; provide subsidies to businesses that seek to provide healthier food options; and, most importantly, prevent the onslaught of advertising for clearly unhealthy food items.
Sandy is a morbidly obese woman looking for advice.
Her husband has no sympathy for her, and tells her she obviously needs to stop eating like a pig, and would it kill her to go to the gym once in a while?
Her doctor tells her that obesity is primarily genetic, and recommends the diet pill orlistat and a consultation with a surgeon about gastric bypass.
Her sister tells her that obesity is a perfectly valid lifestyle choice, and that fat-ism, equivalent to racism, is society's way of keeping her down.
When she tells each of her friends about the opinions of the others, things really start to heat up.
Her husband accuses her doctor and sister of absolving her of personal responsibility with feel-good platitudes that in the end will only prevent her from getting the willpower she needs to start a real diet.
Her doctor accuses her husband of ignorance of the real causes of obesity and of the most effective treatments, and accuses her sister of legitimizing a dangerous health risk that could end with Sandy in hospital or even dead.
Her sister accuses her husband of being a jerk, and her doctor of trying to medicalize her behavior in order to turn it into a "condition" that will keep her on pills for life and make lots of money for Big Pharma.
Sandy is fictional, but similar conversations happen every day, not only about obesity but about a host of other marginal conditions that some consider character flaws, others diseases, and still others normal variation in the human condition. Attention deficit disorder, internet addiction, social anxiety disorder (as one skeptic said, didn't we used to call this "shyness"?), alcoholism, chronic fatigue, oppositional defiant disorder ("didn't we used to call this being a teenager?"), compulsive gambling, homosexuality, Aspergers' syndrome, antisocial personality, even depression have all been placed in two or more of these categories by different people.
Sandy's sister may have a point, but this post will concentrate on the debate between her husband and her doctor, with the understanding that the same techniques will apply to evaluating her sister's opinion. The disagreement between Sandy's husband and doctor centers around the idea of "disease". If obesity, depression, alcoholism, and the like are diseases, most people default to the doctor's point of view; if they are not diseases, they tend to agree with the husband.
The debate over such marginal conditions is in many ways a debate over whether or not they are "real" diseases. The usual surface level arguments trotted out in favor of or against the proposition are generally inconclusive, but this post will apply a host of techniques previously discussed on Less Wrong to illuminate the issue.
...
Have you heard of food deserts where people don't have access to healthy choices because there simply are none in their neighborhoods? What's your thought on that, since you pin it all on personal choice?
What about the subsidization of foods that are unhealthy which makes them cheaper and more accessible than foods that are healthy? If you don't have the money or access to make a healthy choice, then is it really that much of a choice?
Bingo. This isn't something that can be solved by just pointing at fat people calling them lazy. It's a lot more complex than that.Unfortunately, instead of treating it as a scientific issue, we treat it as a moral issue, which has little positive effect and high negative effects.
And coal miners, people with prolonged exposure to asbestos, people with other types of cancer that spread to their lungs. Emphysema is the prominent disease smokers face.Even when the vast majority of cases are due solely to a person choosing to smoke?
We do call alcoholism a disease.
"provide subsidies to businesses that seek to provide healthier food options"
EDIT: Also way to completely and totally cherry pick what I said.
What is the point of this? Smoking is the greatest risk factor for lung cancer. http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/lung-cancer/DS00038/DSECTION=risk-factorsAnd coal miners, people with prolonged exposure to asbestos, people with other types of cancer that spread to their lungs. Emphysema is the prominent disease smokers face.
Maybe 'YOU' don't, but people who know more than you do.'WE' Don't, morons who peddle 12-step bullshit do.
And coal miners, people with prolonged exposure to asbestos, people with other types of cancer that spread to their lungs. Emphysema is the prominent disease smokers face.
'WE' Don't, morons who peddle 12-step bullshit do.
Please provide statistics for the above.Nothing you typed there is a response to what I typed. The vast majority of people with lung cancer got it because they decided to smoke, yet lung cancer is a disease in every case regardless of how a person got it.
Uh...what?
Please provide statistics for the above.
Alcoholism isn't a disease. The idea was popularized by Bill Wilson and Bob Smith. You can't will cancer away by changing your life style in the same way you can alcoholism.
Alcoholism isn't a disease. The idea was popularized by Bill Wilson and Bob Smith.
I'm not saying that the only disease is cancer? Where are you getting this idea?![]()
Also, where did you get this definition of disease that says that the only disease is cancer? It's simply not true and makes you look both uneducated and unwilling to do a simple google search.
You've decided that it and obesity are moral failings, not because of any scientific evidence, but because you want them to be moral failings. Fortunately for the rest of us, science doesn't work that way.
I think it's overweight, not obese.1 in 3 Americans are obese?
No freakin way.
I thought BMI was normally pretty accurate unless you were some kind of bodybuilder.BMI is more or less a height to weight ratio right? So it wouldn't take into account your natural skeletal frame type or the amount of muscle mass / fat you've put onto that frame?
1 in 3 Americans are obese?
No freakin way.
I just don't believe it is based on genetics at all. Unless humans have evolved to be fat in the last 40 years, which I find hard to believe. It's so obviously down to an increase in fast food, a decrease in cooking skills, less physical exercise and the whole idea of 'going on a diet', which implies you eventually get to stop dieting rather than changing your diet for the rest of your life.
All this is going to lead to is people resorting to getting potentially dangerous surgery or medication rather than making some basic lifestyle changes.
Nothing you typed there is a response to what I typed. The vast majority of people with lung cancer got it because they decided to smoke, yet lung cancer is a disease in every case regardless of how a person got it.
it's not a disease, its from unhealthy eating habits, lack of exercise and the processed food we consune.
AIDs, Cancer, and Flu are diseases. Obesity is not.
Not to be a naysayer, but what doctor wouldn't want this classified as a disease? Doesn't this just mean more $$$ to go around? There's a lot of potential for abuse to suggest surgery and drugs for nearly every person that is obese. Guess that's the case with a lot of medical conditions though.
Agreed. And this is one subject I feel quite comfortable having an opinion on without there being an MD next to my name.
I just don't believe it is based on genetics at all. Unless humans have evolved to be fat in the last 40 years, which I find hard to believe. It's so obviously down to an increase in fast food, a decrease in cooking skills, less physical exercise and the whole idea of 'going on a diet', which implies you eventually get to stop dieting rather than changing your diet for the rest of your life.
All this is going to lead to is people resorting to getting potentially dangerous surgery or medication rather than making some basic lifestyle changes.
Thank you doctors for your expert opinions.
The AMA is a well respected body of doctors, not a hack fringe group. Certainly diseases (and subsequent treatments) can be overdiagnosed, but that doesn't mean the disease does not exist, just that it needs to be diagnosed carefully and not confused with other pathophysiologies.
It sounds like you shouldn't be quite so confident in your medical expertise, if your supposition is that diseases are only caused by genetic defects or infective agents.
so i can catch this disease and become fat? really?
and when did cancer become a deisease?
i can catch cancer? what from?
You know not all diseases are contagious, right?