Bailey's Dad
Banned
I just downloaded the demo yesterday and ordered the full version today. Yes welcome me to 5 years ago. I did own the DC version and played that online and I'm looking forward to doing the same with the PC version.
Tre said:Doubt it. Quake 3 was the weakest of the 99 FPS war between itself and UT. UT slaughtered it.
Tre said:Doubt it. Quake 3 was the weakest of the 99 FPS war between itself and UT. UT slaughtered it.
DopeyFish said:Sorry, UT wasn't the better game. Yes, it had better modes... but Assault couldn't save it from Deathmatch perfection.
Tellaerin said:That's terrific... if all you ever intend to play is DM. (And if you never have any intention of playing offline. Q3a bot AI is really weak, especially by UT standards.) UT's just a better package all around.
DopeyFish said:Because the whole idea of playing a DM game is to play against the computer?![]()
DopeyFish said:UT was a waste of my money.
buck naked said:UT was the better package, Q3A had the better gameplay. It's like Tekken to Virtua Fighter, gameplay wise.
Crazymoogle said:^^^ditto.
UT may have had a whole lot of shit to do, but for core deathmatch Q3A can't be beat. I don't even know why UT2K4 has a deathmatch mode...it just seems to be so beside the point.
elitehebrew said:I haven't touched that game in well over a year now. I think they need a Quake 4 stat...with out the 2 year delays which seems to be going trend with the FPS genre
Tellaerin said:That's terrific... if all you ever intend to play is DM. (And if you never have any intention of playing offline. Q3a bot AI is really weak, especially by UT standards.) UT's just a better package all around.
Error Macro said:Speaking of which... What happened to Quake 4 anyway? It started development (supposedly) a couple of years ago. It was being done by an outside developer, not Id themselves.
Doc Holliday said:What i've noticed....
If you think Quake3 gameplay was boring or simplistic than you weren't good at it.
Doc Holliday said:Ive noticed that people that played quake are much better than the people that play UT.
Doc Holliday said:I didnt play UT seriously till 2004, and i can pretty own any one of you guys at DM![]()
Gattsu25 said:if you want to play Quake 3 with *some* UT gameplay thrown in, play UT2K3
Gattsu25 said:if you want to play Quake 3 with *some* UT gameplay thrown in, play UT2K3
IJoel said:I wish UT had rocket jumping. That'd kick so much ass.
Mister Zimbu said:And what the hell are you talking about when you said UT had a better GUI? UT's GUI sucked hard!
The serious DM players swear by Q3A because it is the better DM game, and better FPS, end of story. UT, however, is a much broader game. 2004 gives a reason for the series to exsist though, because while still not the best pure DM (though much, much better than UT or 2K3), it has so much else to it that makes it's experience more than worth playing.Tellaerin said:A lot of 'serious' deathmatch players swear by Q3a, and still play it to this day. I have to agree with Tre, though--UT was the better game.
Andy787 said:The serious DM players swear by Q3A because it is the better DM game, and better FPS, end of story.
Andy787 said:2004 gives a reason for the series to exsist though, because while still not the best pure DM (though much, much better than UT or 2K3), it has so much else to it that makes it's experience more than worth playing.
BlackSalad said:quake 3 is so much smoother and less clunky than any UT game. The weapons are perfect and simple, and each one is very important to playing the game well. Rocket-jumping and strafe jumping alone could be an entire game and certaintly take a LOT of practice to master. And through the console the game is completely customizable, you can even create your own movements, combinations, etc.
I never thought UT had anything unique like those things mentioned, it was just a bunch glamor. The movement was clunky and weapons were just slow.