Prospero said:I don't know what I'd use that for, but I want one.
Sometimes I think I should just go ahead and shell out $5,000 for a high-end system, and relieve myself of computer envy for the next seven or eight years.
DaCocoBrova said:This LCD or a plasma? If it's an LCD, I want to know the pixel response time.
scola said:Umm you only need a second DVI if you want to use dual monitors.
You don't need dual DVI to run this monitor
scola said:Umm you only need a second DVI if you want to use dual monitors.
You don't need dual DVI to run this monitor
scola said:Ah I see it is a single cable on a card that supports the "dual link" digital signal standard. That is where I was confusing things. Could that be a more ambiguous name![]()
SteveMeister said:Of course 2560 x 1600 is an insanely huge number of pixels, so I guess it's not that surprising!
DaCocoBrova said:This is just an LCD. The native resolution is what it will look best with. Anything else will not look so good.
DaCocoBrova said:This is just an LCD. The native resolution is what it will look best with. Anything else will not look so good.
Too pricey for a 30" LCD. That's Apple for you.
Idle Will Kill said:
DaCocoBrova said:What is the pixel refresh?
Also, how do they get away with charging that much?
Idle Will Kill said:
Apple drops its new 30 inch HD display for $3299
cvkpaladin said:Do you really need a Power Mac G5 to use this monitor? What if I had a PC with an Nvidia 6800 Ultra, could I use that as well?
akascream said:Apple who?
![]()
shantyman said:Why is the resolution so low? The taskbar takes up like 10% of the screen.
No way, when you have a mac, elitism squelches all such pressure.Bregor said:Within six months you would be jealous of the new stuff that was released.