• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Article - Battlefield Franchise Undergoes Major Shake-Up









Electronic Arts is making major changes to its development structure as it focuses on growing and expanding the Battlefield series following what has been a challenging launch for Battlefield 2042.

The future-set military shooter launched in November and was swiftly criticized for a lack of features found in previous games and for its many bugs, some of which--including the infamous "unable to load persistence data" bug--prevented users from playing entirely. Perhaps the biggest change being announced today is EA is formally announcing the creation of a Battlefield universe that will seemingly span multiple games and offerings, which will be developed by different studios across North America and Europe.

Additionally, DICE GM Oskar Gabrielson is leaving the company to pursue a new endeavor outside of EA. The shake-up also includes Respawn's Vince Zampella taking on a bigger role as the new overall boss of the Battlefield franchise, while Halo designer Marcus Lehto is building a new development team in Seattle focused on injecting more storytelling into the Battlefield universe. Ripple Effect, the developer of Battlefield 2042's Portal mode, is developing a new Battlefield experience in the Battlefield 2042 universe.

In the immediate future, EA told GameSpot that DICE, Ripple Effect, and Lehto's new Seattle studio will work together to expand upon and improve Battlefield 2042. The other Battlefield games and experiences in the works are meant to serve as extensions, to a degree, of the new Battlefield universe that EA is trying to create. There are no specifics available about the new games and experiences that EA intends to create or when they will release, as of yet.

As for Lehto, the man who designed Master Chief and played a major role in making Halo what it is today, he is heading up a new, unnamed studio in the Seattle area. It will collaborate with DICE and Ripple Effect with the aim of expanding the narrative, storytelling, and character development opportunities in the Battlefield series. There is no word yet on what this means in terms of specific products or strategies, however.

In a big shift, Battlefield 2042 did not have a single-player mode, instead opting to focus on three main multiplayer pillars: All-Out Warfare, Portal, and Hazard Zone. Lehto previously started an independent studio called V1 Interactive that made a sci-fi shooter called Disintegration. The game failed to find an audience, and V1 closed its doors. Lehto was hired by EA earlier this year, but it isn't until today that we're learning what he's working on.

Byron Beede, the longtime Call of Duty veteran who EA hired earlier this year to grow the Battlefield series as the shepherd of its long-term strategy and business decisions, said Lehto and his team in Seattle will expand Battlefield 2042's narrative across a "variety of experiences." These will lay the foundation for "storytelling opportunities now and well into the future," Beede teased. Whatever Lehto's team creates, it will show up in "later seasons" for Battlefield 2042 and "beyond."

"While he and his team in the Seattle area are just getting started on building the Battlefield world of tomorrow, their work will shape later seasons for 2042 and beyond," Beede said. "This new studio will act as the driver for narrative in tight collaboration with DICE and Ripple Effect Studios to help build great player experiences in the Battlefield universe."

In another big move, Battlefield 2042 Portal developer Ripple Effect will continue to support Portal while it gets to work on a "new experience" in the Battlefield 2042 universe. Ripple Effect boss Christian Grass told GameSpot that he's unable to comment on what Ripple Effect is developing outside of Portal.

Zampella's new position is on top of his existing managerial responsibilities at Respawn, which includes overseeing the ongoing efforts for live-service title Apex Legends and the studio's other unannounced projects, one of which is rumored to be a sequel to Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order. EA chief operating officer Laura Miele sung Zampella's praises, saying he is the right person to lead the Battlefield franchise into the future, building off his past successes with Call of Duty, Medal of Honor, and Apex Legends.

"He creates culture-defining entertainment that resonants beyond games. We are bringing one of the most influential and talented individuals in entertainment to a franchise that is ready to be unleashed into the modern era of gaming. It's an extraordinary inflection point in game history. His ability to lead studios and bring developers together so they can create world-class experiences is unmatched," Miele said. "I believe the structure, process, and vision he brings will enable Battlefield to excel like never before. No one knows shooters and live services better than Vince."

Together with Beede, Miele believes the right team is in place to help the Battlefield franchise grow and thrive. Miele went on to say that EA now has people with "strong operational experience" running its studios across North America and Europe who are contributing to the newly established Battlefield universe.

Zampella said EA plans to "grow significantly" in terms of the number of developers working on the Battlefield franchise across the company, and he called on developers to have a look at EA's open positions and consider putting in an application.

Zampella wouldn't comment on specifics as it relates to the new types of Battlefield games that EA might develop in the future, or the cadence for when they might be released. However, he teased that Battlefield's universe is "rich with opportunity, both from a storytelling perspective and as a universe where our teams can create innovative gameplay experiences. Truly, anything is possible."

EA CEO Andrew Wilson has said the company may eventually develop a free-to-play Battlefield game, and while Zampella stopped short of confirming this, he said the company is "exploring every possibility" as it looks to grow Battlefield to help it reach its full potential."

Beede said EA has devised a "long-term plan" to support Battlefield going forward, but before the company gets into specifics about where the series is headed next, the first job is to support Battlefield 2042 and expand it through its live-service offering.

"From that foundation our teams will create new experiences that expand the Battlefield universe. So I wouldn't say there is a cadence or deadline, we need to do what is right for our players and our game," Beede said.

Not everyone is staying on board through this transition, however, as Gabrielson, DICE's current GM, is leaving the company at the end of the year. In a statement, Gabrielson said leaving DICE and EA entirely was among the most difficult decisions he's had to make in his life. "It is hard to put into words my passion for our studio, our teams and the Battlefield franchise. The last decade with the team at DICE has been nothing short of amazing. From the debut of Battlefield 3, to Star Wars Battlefront and Battlefield 1, and of course the return of all-out warfare with Battlefield 2042," Gabrielson said. "There's just been so many great memories working with our teams. DICE has some of the best talent in the industry and the team is in great hands."

"As a whole, we're all-in on Battlefield. It is one of the most important and valuable franchises in the industry. Collectively, we are out to unlock its enormous potential." -- EA COO Laura Miele
Rebecka Coutaz, the former studio director at Ubisoft Annecy, is taking over for Gabrielson as GM of DICE going forward. Gabrielson is staying on with DICE and EA for the rest of the year to help Coutaz with the transition to the role of GM. Gabrielson said he's leaving to start a "new adventure," but it remains to be seen where he might be headed next.

Although Battlefield 2042 might not have enjoyed the strongest start as it relates to player reception, Miele tells GameSpot that Battlefield 2042 is trending in the right direction already since launch. She said players are responding positively to the changes DICE has made so far, though there remains plenty of negativity online. The newest update, which is the biggest one for Battlefield 2042 to date with more than 150 fixes, went live today, December 2.

"We are lucky we have such passionate fans, and I am confident we will continue to do everything we can to meet their expectations. We believe in 2042 as it is the cornerstone for the future as we begin work to expand the universe," Miele said. "As a whole, we're all-in on Battlefield. It is one of the most important and valuable franchises in the industry. Collectively, we are out to unlock its enormous potential."

It remains to be seen what these changes mean for DICE's other big series, Star Wars: Battlefront. The 2015 and 2017 games combined to sell 33 million copies, making them massively commercially successful, but it was recently reported that EA rejected a pitch for Battlefront 3, citing licensing costs.

EA's new statement about being "all-in" on Battlefield suggests that no further Battlefront games are in the works at DICE, though this is not strictly confirmed.

And in terms of Coutaz's new role as GM of DICE, the rest of her management team includes the following:

  • Lars Gustavsson, Creative Director
  • Daniel Berlin, Game Designer
  • Andreas Morell, Producer
  • Conor Lenihan, Head of Tech
  • Roger Collum, Studio Development
  • Ryan McArthur, Producer
  • Elisabet Gretarsdottir, Head of Strategy & Biz Dev
  • Calle Wahlfors, Head of Studio Operations
What this all means for EA, DICE, and Battlefield remains to be seen. While the publisher is positioning the news as an exciting future for Battlefield, there's no way to know at this stage just what the outcome will look like--will we get annualized Battlefield releases? A free-to-play battle royale game? Will DICE have the opportunity to work on non-Battlefield games? The announcement raises more questions than answers at this point.
 
Last edited:

mansoor1980

Gold Member
looks like they are pinning their hopes a lot on the battlefield brand , i hope for a new bad company game
 
Marcus Lehto is building a new development team in Seattle focused on injecting more storytelling into the Battlefield universe

o8CAZqp.gif
 
u just release a game that ppl don't like, and ur reaction is to announce multiple games in this series?????

im stunned. The only acceptable thing they could've announced was that they are cancelling any kinda future bs for 2042, and leaning heavy into supporting BF Portal with tons of new content
 

Croatoan

They/Them A-10 Warthog
I like the idea but Vince better salvage 2042 "No Man's Sky" style or it will all be DOA.

Hot rumor from a friend. One of the games is a single player/coop "wildlandsish" title and another is some sort of "royale" (no specifics on if it is a br or extraction royal like tarkov).

I think hazard zone was a test that never got fully developed because dice dropped the ball.

Real talk, Ripple Effect is the best battlefield dev by a mile and whatever they make will be great. Here us hoping the expand portal or spin it off into it's own thing.
 
Last edited:

SlimySnake

Flashless at the Golden Globes
Too little, too late. BF 2042 is a disaster already, and the next game wont be out until 2024.

Vince Zampela cant save a toxic franchise. They need to kill Battlefield and move on. Make a new IP like Vince did when he left Medal of Honor. Doubling down on a toxic IP that has bombed twice in a row is NOT a good idea.

Who the fuck wants 7 battlefield games? It's good to see them hire some Bungie talent to make a single player game, but dont need to tie to Battlefield. Launching Portal with BF2042 is a huge mistake because thats the best BF experience out right now and not many people are playing it. It shouldve gotten its own release next year either in March or as their big fall title. It has been sent to die by launching with a 64 metacritic game, and a split userbase.

I have no idea why they cant learn from Activision. You have three teams, right? Get them on a 3 year cycle and have a new game ready every year. They gave DICE 3 years, 7 studios and this is the disaster they produced. Not good enough.
 

HTK

Banned
Why are they doing this, I thought everything was fine? If anyone can salvage this franchise it's Vince Zampella.
 

JoeBudden

Member
The article on gamespot is great, i know a lot of you hate the game right now but its gonna have a bright future with Vince leading the charge

I'm skeptical with how they really fumbled Apex Legends over the years. But lets see how it goes.
 

Men_in_Boxes

Snake Oil Salesman
I like the idea but Vince better salvage 2042 "No Man's Sky" style or it will all be DOA.

Do you really believe this?

If the next mainline Battlefield game turns out great, do you really think a noticable percentage of the market will pass on it because 2042 was a dud?

I haven't seen much evidence to suggest that gamers hold grudges with developers/publishers.
 
Meh, proof will be in the pudding.

I hope the franchise can return to form in the future but I'm sceptical to be honest.

As for a Battlefield 'universe' and more focus on storytelling... who gives a fuck? No one plays these games for the story.

It seems to me like they want to go down the Fortnite/Warzone route of creating a platform to then just regularly update. Adding more 'story' as time goes by (and microtransactions).

Makes sense really, these games are cash cows and the development costs must be minimal when compared to making a full blown game.

We'll see how it goes...
 

Banjo64

cumsessed
Why do these idiots think we want stories in our online FPS games for fucks sake? Just look at train wrecks like Overwatch and steer well fucking clear. I am a man with a gun and I want to shoot you is the only story needed. I don’t care about how little Billy’s cousin was murdered and his wife was fucked by the milk man and now he can never trust again. Just fuck off.
 
Last edited:

Jigsaah

Member
Hmmm, I'm encouraged cuz Vince is taking over...but what about Titanfall 3? Also, wtf happened to DICE? Did they have some mass exodus of developers or leadership I'm not aware of?
 

Fake

Member
Can't just expect more from modern devs to be honest. Games are getting release in the same patern. Broken, multiplayer focused.
 

Shubh_C63

Member
Respawn record is pretty stellar so I assume that's a huge move from EA.

But as with all things EA, bolder the move the bigger the kickback at first sign of trouble.
We were not going to get TF3 anyway.
 

EverydayBeast

ChatGPT 0.1
Blowing up houses and having them fall on enemies was WILD years later Battlefield is getting eaten by lag, cosmetics, connection issues, tons of other reasons why Battlefield TODAY isn’t playing well. The new squad modes stink, the city centric tower maps aren’t good enough.
 

StreetsofBeige

Gold Member
I like the idea but Vince better salvage 2042 "No Man's Sky" style or it will all be DOA.

Hot rumor from a friend. One of the games is a single player/coop "wildlandsish" title and another is some sort of "royale" (no specifics on if it is a br or extraction royal like tarkov).

I think hazard zone was a test that never got fully developed because dice dropped the ball.

Real talk, Ripple Effect is the best battlefield dev by a mile and whatever they make will be great. Here us hoping the expand portal or spin it off into it's own thing.
Too little, too late. BF 2042 is a disaster already, and the next game wont be out until 2024.

Vince Zampela cant save a toxic franchise. They need to kill Battlefield and move on. Make a new IP like Vince did when he left Medal of Honor. Doubling down on a toxic IP that has bombed twice in a row is NOT a good idea.

Who the fuck wants 7 battlefield games? It's good to see them hire some Bungie talent to make a single player game, but dont need to tie to Battlefield. Launching Portal with BF2042 is a huge mistake because thats the best BF experience out right now and not many people are playing it. It shouldve gotten its own release next year either in March or as their big fall title. It has been sent to die by launching with a 64 metacritic game, and a split userbase.

I have no idea why they cant learn from Activision. You have three teams, right? Get them on a 3 year cycle and have a new game ready every year. They gave DICE 3 years, 7 studios and this is the disaster they produced. Not good enough.
The one benefit they have is time. Since BF games come out every 3 years, they can polish up the game over the next year like how BF4 gamers said it got fixed up.

COD dev teams and players after a yer move on to the next game, so not much point putting too much effort into fixing a game long term. But BF fans are still around for another few years until their new game comes out.
 
The article on gamespot is great, i know a lot of you hate the game right now but its gonna have a bright future with Vince leading the charge
If he's taking a bigger role in Battlefield, then who will oversee the Star Wars, TitanFall, and APEX development teams to make sure they stay true to their fundamentals? You can't spread one person out across too many projects or they all suffer.
 
Last edited:

Croatoan

They/Them A-10 Warthog
Hmmm, I'm encouraged cuz Vince is taking over...but what about Titanfall 3? Also, wtf happened to DICE? Did they have some mass exodus of developers or leadership I'm not aware of?
yes. Talent is at Embark Studios now.
 
Battlefield under competent leadership should have already crushed Call of Duty ages ago. We all know this, right? Battlefield with the right game design and campaign combined with an incredible MP could do serious damage in the games industry. Battlefield has the name, the history, but not seemingly the direction.
 

DeaDPo0L84

Member
Encouraging sure, this is essentially what happened too little too late with BF4 but they're doing it a month into the release of 2042.

I give zero shits about the expanded universe, get ONE game right before you try and expand, even hearing about that shit is annoying.

But as I said...encouraging, 2042 needs all hands on deck and as much tlc as possible.
 

tygertrip

Member
Do you really believe this?

If the next mainline Battlefield game turns out great, do you really think a noticable percentage of the market will pass on it because 2042 was a dud?

I haven't seen much evidence to suggest that gamers hold grudges with developers/publishers.
Blowing up houses and having them fall on enemies was WILD years later Battlefield is getting eaten by lag, cosmetics, connection issues, tons of other reasons why Battlefield TODAY isn’t playing well. The new squad modes stink, the city centric tower maps aren’t good enough.
They should expand Portal MASSIVELY. More maps, of course, and add Battlefield Vietnam. I want to sneak through jungles again, shit was awesome. And With the overpowered M60!
 
Last edited:

ClosBSAS

Member
and funny how some ppl argue that 2042 player numbers are just dandy when theyve been on a massive fall since launch.
game is in bad shape. a massive shakeup is what it needs.

futuristic wall running, here we go baby.
 

TransTrender

Gold Member
I agree, but if anyone can salvage a franchise and make it better or make it what we use to love it's Vince Zampella.
Based on what's happening here, there's no fixing it.
It seems fundamentally and architecturally broken so I'm thinking a lot of potential improvements will not be possible.
 

tygertrip

Member
Battlefield under competent leadership should have already crushed Call of Duty ages ago. We all know this, right? Battlefield with the right game design and campaign combined with an incredible MP could do serious damage in the games industry. Battlefield has the name, the history, but not seemingly the direction.
The early Battlefields shit all over COD mp. It was like, COD mp was for the riff-raff, and "real gamers" played the BF series. That was a long time ago. BF has gone to shit, Portal is the only bright light.
Meanwhile I'm going to go hang myself for using the term "real gamers".
 

FunkMiller

Member
Shaking things up a bit, eh?

Are they going to do something completely crazy and make a good, finished game for once?
 

Codes 208

Member
Vince? The former head of infinityward who would go on to form respawn and co-created titanfall is taking over?

ok this i can get behind.
 

Papacheeks

Banned
Based on what's happening here, there's no fixing it.
It seems fundamentally and architecturally broken so I'm thinking a lot of potential improvements will not be possible.

I know that, I'm saying if there is anyone with vision who can get that series back on track which could mean a new game, or new direction I'm all for it. Vince has proven he knows shooters and knows what he's doing.
 
Top Bottom