Japanese mangaka tends to have the main story figured out though.
So I think we're good here.
Japanese mangaka tends to have the main story figured out though.
So I think we're good here.
While I think there's been quite a few signs that Isayama is planning ahead, I certainly wouldn't argue that mangaka always are. Urasawa Naoki is almost as careless as Lindelof/Cuse, for example.Japanese mangaka tends to have the main story figured out though.
Japanese mangaka tends to have the main story figured out though.
So I think we're good here.
While I think there's been quite a few signs that Isayama is planning ahead, I certainly wouldn't argue that mangaka always are. Urasawa Naoki is almost as careless as Lindelof/Cuse, for example.
Yeah, no. The reveals so far actually work in retrospect, as if they had been *gasp* planned all along. That's very much unlike Lost.It does feel a hell of a lot like Lost.
The Johan plot in Monster, Billy Bat...I can only think of 20th Century Boys on where he did that.
When there's no rhyme nor reason, I think "messy" is more adequate.But then again, almost all of his stories are ridiculously complex.
Yeah, no. The reveals so far actually work in retrospect, as if they had been *gasp* planned all along. That's very much unlike Lost.
It could go wrong, sure, but Lost never "went right" to begin with.
It does feel a hell of a lot like Lost.
The Titans are attacking! Their motivations are mysterious yet horrifying!
They can suddenly teleport!
I can't remember what happened!
I can turn into a titan!
She can too! And her!
Some of them can talk!
One of them is hairy and super intelligent! And can probably turn people into titans too!
The wall is made of titans!
My friends were genocidal all along!
Fuck this.
It wasn't until towards the very end when the CORE mysteries were "revealed" that it's clear they didn't give a fuck about those from the start. Let's not retcon stuff. Shingeki is exactly like Lost, the only difference is that Lost ended, and this hasn't yet.
Can't wait to lick all your bitter tears.
You'll be licking it yourself.
If there's one thing GAF good at over the years, it's being wrong.
Plot-wise? Nah.Wrong. Lost totally "went right" for many seasons.
Nah, you could tell it was BS very early on.They said they never introduced a mystery without knowing the answer, and for 3-4 seasons at least, that seemed very much to be the case.
To be fair, there is quite a bit of foreshadowing surrounding stuff, or this guy wouldn't have called the Reiner and Bertholdt thing a year before it happened.
Plot-wise? Nah.
Nah, you could tell it was BS very early on.
Magic numbers? Yeah, I bet there's going to be a perfectly satisfactory explanation for those!
A computer that's set up in such a way that you have to enter those numbers every 108 minutes? Why, I'm sure the writers could tell us exactly how that makes sense! And why you have to do so manually, too!
Hieroglyphs in the doomsday countdown? Yup, there will be surely be a good explanation as to why scientists bothered with those!
Shingeki no Kyojin could fuck up a lot of things down the road, sure, but it's definitely doing a much better job than Lost so far. You can tell the guy is planning ahead (at least to some extent), whereas you could tell the Lost guys never had any fucking clue. Weird that you can't tell the difference, actually.
That's just you being weird!Lost was much more enjoyable early on than Shingeki is at this point.
My point was that those are all telltales of a story written without care nor foresight.A lot of those are details which only seem more important than they are in retrospect.
But those aren't even red herrings, that's the thing. They're "new mysteries" that clearly weren't thought through at all and couldn't possibly go anywhere satisfying.When writing serialized fiction, it's very common to throw a mix of actual hints and red herrings.
You could absolutely tell while the show was airing (and very early on, like I said). I know I did.It's really easy to look back on something and go "well all of that was nonsense, LOL!"
Sure, but I'm talking about how they differ, here: the planning. And that's a pretty big difference!Weird that you're trying so hard to completely distance something you like from something you dislike, even though the real reasons why they're both massively popular are because of the similarities in the narrative style and how it baits people along.
I agree about the execution being rough around the edges. I'll take that over Urasawa's insulting nonsense any day though. "It's great as long as you don't think about it" isn't quite my idea of a compliment! ^^Even if we assume that the author in Shingeki planned everything ahead right from the start, I'll say that it doesn't matter at all if in the end he can't take advantage of that and deliver the narrative in a satisfying way. This is something Urasawa is REALLY good at. He might be pulling total crap out of his ass, but he does so in such an engaging way that most people are spellbound by the events until long after they occur and given enough time to think about it all the plot holes appear.
The way reveals are done in Shingeki are just laughable and amateur. So even if he did plan them ahead, he's just not good at telling the story well.
I agree about the execution being rough around the edges. I'll take that over Urasawa's insulting nonsense any day though. "It's great as long as you don't think about it" isn't quite my idea of a compliment! ^^
It does feel a hell of a lot like Lost.
The Titans are attacking! Their motivations are mysterious yet horrifying!
They can suddenly teleport!
I can't remember what happened!
I can turn into a titan!
She can too! And her!
Some of them can talk!
One of them is hairy and super intelligent! And can probably turn people into titans too!
The wall is made of titans!
My friends were genocidal all along!
Fuck this.
Considering how much emphasis Urasawa puts on those mysteries, I can't agree, here.I don't find Urasawa's stuff insulting at all. It's entertaining, and honestly after decades of consuming such stuff, I think that people who actually get too invested into mysteries and wanting everything to tie up nicely and have satisfying answers probably deserve to get owned anyway.
About the "journey"...What matters is the journey, not so much the destination. If the destination was all nicely planned out but the journey is annoying and not enjoyable, what's the point?
Can't say I agree about the characters and narrative... Tenma's "Fugitive" plot is the last decent thing I remember from Urasawa (again, I haven't read Pluto, but I'm not optimistic).I'll take anything Urasawa does any day over Shingeki because Urasawa actually has interesting characters and narratives, even if he tries too hard on the "mystery" angle.
Considering how much emphasis Urasawa puts on those mysteries, I can't agree, here.
It does feel a hell of a lot like Lost.
The Titans are attacking! Their motivations are mysterious yet horrifying!
They can suddenly teleport!
I can't remember what happened!
I can turn into a titan!
She can too! And her!
Some of them can talk!
One of them is hairy and super intelligent! And can probably turn people into titans too!
The wall is made of titans!
My friends were genocidal all along!
Fuck this.
Thing is, I think Urasawa/Nagasaki and Lindelof/Cuse fail on both accounts. It's not just the "mythology" of their stories that's rotten: the characters and their arcs (or what passes for arcs) often are downright terrible. The characters in Shingeki no Kyojin really aren't breaking any new grounds, far from it, but I'll gladly take that over the incoherence of the 20th Century Boys and Lost cast.I think you just put too much stock in the mystery element of such stories. I'm not saying they're not bullshit, but just like with Lost, I find that the character development and interactions in an unusual situation are much more satisfying than trying to figure out what happens and piecing everything together backwards. The foundation of the stories are the characters and situations, and not the mystery.
Then again, my post had nothing to do with studying the reasons for its success either! ^^When discussing why the work took off so quickly and became so popular, it is impossible not to compare it to Lost because that's the hook. Whether the mysteries are eventually satisfying or whether the author planned it all beforehand doesn't really matter when studying the reasons for its success.
Maybe a lot of viewers can't tell (or aren't even interested in) the difference between poorly planned mysteries and well planned ones, sure, and maybe that difference really doesn't matter much when discussing the reasons behind the success of a show, indeed. But when you can tell the difference, when it matters to you... well, it makes a (pretty big) difference to you. Obviously. ;þWhether the solutions to the mysteries are well planned or not doesn't matter because by the time people actually find out, it's too late. Just like Lost. The majority of the audience are not really interested in how well planned something is - only how interesting the mysteries are.
[20th Century Boys spoilers]Let's look at it as a character study about a bunch of kids who grew up in the 60s and 70s, dealing with the modern world as adults. There's a lot of interaction which has nothing to do with the mysteries at all.
Well, I think you're being very charitable, there... It all felt quite simplistic (and often downright naive) to me.Their flashbacks served as a window into what an older era of Japan was like, with a lot of commentary on social issues and the change in the times as the decades went by. The story explored themes like religion, ambition, what people wanted out of their lives, the consequences of a culture of bullying in schools, etc.
Maybe they're only watching the TV show? Or they have forgotten some details from the manga...Wait, why do people say that the titans teleport?
Wait, why do people say that the titans teleport?
What matters is the journey, not so much the destination. If the destination was all nicely planned out but the journey is annoying and not enjoyable, what's the point? On the other hand, if you have a good time reading something and the moment to moment stuff is exciting and fun, who really cares if at the end of it there's no deeper meaning to some of the context? Ideally you can have both, but that so rarely happens it's stupid to even expect it imo.
Thing is, I think Urasawa/Nagasaki and Lindelof/Cuse fail on both accounts. It's not just the "mythology" of their stories that's rotten: the characters and their arcs (or what passes for arcs) often are downright terrible. The characters in Shingeki no Kyojin really aren't breaking any new grounds, far from it, but I'll gladly take that over the incoherence of the 20th Century Boys and Lost cast.
I feel like I've given waaaay too many examples for Lost elsewhere already, so er... Kanna, maybe? Would you actually defend 20th Century Boys' Kanna and her arc?
Exactly. I mean, as long they're slashing titans and stuff I like it.Well, I never expected it to have deep storytelling or characterization. It's a shounen after all. I'm reading it because I enjoy the world, action, and character interaction.
Well, I never expected it to have deep storytelling or characterization. It's a shounen after all. I'm reading it because I enjoy the world, action, and character interaction.
Well, I never expected it to have deep storytelling or characterization. It's a shounen after all. I'm reading it because I enjoy the world, action, and character interaction.
When people starting using reasoning like this, they will just feel empty when its reaching to the point where Bleach ended up now.
Agreed. Besides, even if it weren't quite off-topic anyway, I'd probably find it a bit difficult to argue over 20th Century Boys and its characters, as it's been a while since I last opened a volume or discussed all that... ^^;Shrug. I just don't agree. There are good attempts at telling different types of stories, and some are better than others, but I appreciate that sort of storytelling way more than the sort of tripe in Shingeki these days. I don't see a point of us going back and forth with "I disagree" and "I disagree too" over and over though.
I agree that the series really doesn't do much in terms of character development, but I find the story rather compelling.I really thought the series was going to settle down and actually do character building and worthwhile storytelling after Eren sealed the hole and they accepted what he was. But nope, they're more interested in just doing fights all over the place and having people shouting instead. Sorry, but that's just garbage to me, especially when you have a world which could be potentially much more interesting if they bothered to have balanced storytelling.
But it used to be funner
There's certainly a lot more worse Shounen manga you can read than SnK. No idea why it's getting so much flak and since when Shounen manga plot hold to high standards anyway?
Bleach got terrible really fast though. It's people's own fault if they're still reading that.
For a person that really hates this manga, Duckroll sure does post here often. That is some dedication.