dannethmps
Neo Member
Mordaunt Short setup for me




![]()
Use these for my PC and PS3. Kickass headphones, with extremely deep rumble and a LOT of punch. Look into them.
That's a generalization one shouldn't consider hard and fast.Once you go active studio gear you don't go back to hifi.
I use a pair of active midfield studio monitors.
![]()
and a BK XLS400 12" sub.
![]()
Once you go active studio gear you don't go back to hifi.
Active is indeed the better technology because of some obvious reasons, but that doesn't mean that every active loudspeaker is good.
My opinion is: active monitors (with closed subwoofer) for music and a passive setup (with bass reflex subwoofer) for movies.
I use a pair of active midfield studio monitors.
and a BK XLS400 12" sub.
Once you go active studio gear you don't go back to hifi.
These are my speakers for my main setup:
![]()
And for my computer, I use Adam Audio A7Xs:
![]()
I don't have a subwoofer for either setup, though I'm planning on adding one after I move in a few months. And I'm probably going to be replacing the A7Xs, as well... not that they're bad or anything.
I also have a pair of Sennheiser HD650s around here somewhere, but I haven't used them in a long time because I fucking hate headphones. I don't like feeling tethered to something, and they mess up my stylish hair that I took so much time to mess up in the morning.
Anyway, I do like my setups. They're just stereo setups rather than full 5.1, but I'd much rather have a great stereo setup than a decent 5.1, especially when you consider that most games have pretty shoddy sound mixing anyway. Two solid speakers are more than capable of delivering crisp dialogue and enough bombast to make you shit yourself.
And I wouldn't concern yourself with how good a set of speakers is for games -- if it's good for music, it's good for everything. At the end of the day, what you should be looking for is something that produces the most accurate sound possible. While I haven't heard them, personally, I have heard good things about Ascend's speakers... though you're going to need to pair those with a sub, which entails another concern: you're gonna want to factor in the cost of a subwoofer. And unfortunately, subs are kinda pricey, unless you get some boomy piece of shit that's better relegated to some hoodrat's car. You don't want that! Neither do I. Again - the goal is accuracy, because you want the whole system to sound pristine.
So:
Speaker company recommendations for what I think is your price range: Ascend, Aperion, Monitor Audio, SVS
Subwoofer recommendations: SVS, Rythmik, possibly Emotiva
Yeah, in most cases active speakers are far better passive speakers if you just want a 2.0 or 2.1 system. HiFi hardware in most cases is just a huge rip-off designed to prey on those that have incomplete knowledge of acoustics. When I look at some of their photos, I can't really believe that they've spent so much money on hardware without bothering with room treatment.
If you're looking to build a full system, I remember the Pioneer 5.1 speaker package that was designed by Andrew Jones being very, very good for the price. Match that up with some cheap 12 AWG speaker wire and a half decent home theatre receiver from Denon, Pioneer, or Yamaha and you've got a pretty good entry level home theatre system. The total price for everything, assuming you can even find the speaker package anymore, was around $800 USD when I last checked a year ago. Should do a perfectly fine job with music too if you put it into stereo mode.
Unfortunately I don't have any suggestions, but I do want to commend you on how excellent your living room looks. I love the floating cabinets/counter. Great choice on the B&W speakers by the way.
My passion for audio gear took a nose dive when I developed Otosclerosis in my left ear but this thread reminded me of the days when I use to be really into the scene, I think I bought a new system every 1-2 years.
Ha, wait a minute, I posted my setup in this thread last year.
Maks super awesome room. I was an inch away from buying the CM5s in Rosewood a bit ago, such a beautiful speaker. Still happy with my Paradigm/Rythmik combo but I continue to hunt for a center speaker.
my two cents: Audiophiles are music enthusiasts, they try to gather new experiences, emotions and that unlistened sound from music with the use of the highest technology available.
For gaming (or movies from what i personally think), you can do a pretty good job with way less expansive gear.
Guys would a regular HT soundbar work well with a computer?
I got dual monitors and now theres no room for my computer speakers(theyre sitting behind the monitors at the moment)
These are my speakers for my main setup:
![]()
And for my computer, I use Adam Audio A7Xs:
![]()
I don't have a subwoofer for either setup, though I'm planning on adding one after I move in a few months. And I'm probably going to be replacing the A7Xs, as well... not that they're bad or anything.
I also have a pair of Sennheiser HD650s around here somewhere, but I haven't used them in a long time because I fucking hate headphones. I don't like feeling tethered to something, and they mess up my stylish hair that I took so much time to mess up in the morning.
Anyway, I do like my setups. They're just stereo setups rather than full 5.1, but I'd much rather have a great stereo setup than a decent 5.1, especially when you consider that most games have pretty shoddy sound mixing anyway. Two solid speakers are more than capable of delivering crisp dialogue and enough bombast to make you shit yourself.
And I wouldn't concern yourself with how good a set of speakers is for games -- if it's good for music, it's good for everything. At the end of the day, what you should be looking for is something that produces the most accurate sound possible. While I haven't heard them, personally, I have heard good things about Ascend's speakers... though you're going to need to pair those with a sub, which entails another concern: you're gonna want to factor in the cost of a subwoofer. And unfortunately, subs are kinda pricey, unless you get some boomy piece of shit that's better relegated to some hoodrat's car. You don't want that! Neither do I. Again - the goal is accuracy, because you want the whole system to sound pristine.
So:
Speaker company recommendations for what I think is your price range: Ascend, Aperion, Monitor Audio, SVS
Subwoofer recommendations: SVS, Rythmik, possibly Emotiva
The Fiio is an absolute miracle for the price, and sounds nearly as good as the much more expensive dedicated DAC on my desk... and mates incredibly well with the HD600 when you set the gain high. The little thing has power to spare, and an equivalent amp / DAC a few years ago would have probably cost upwards of $500. You can use a few different inputs, either the optical (for best quality) that a PS3 or 360 has, or USB for your PC if it lacks optical. If you don't have any of those, a simple headphone 1/8" to 1/8" mini will do the trick to bypass the DAC and just get analog out.
How do you like the Martin Logan's overall? I'm thinking about getting the Theos with the surrounds for 5.1 sound. I tested them and they sounded amazing, but that was a demo.
On topic, Jamo, Denon 891, velodyne sub. Time to upgrade really.
Hey man, I didn't see your post until now.
Love the Martin Logans, but they're not a one size fits all solution. You basically need to have them in a setup where you can place them a few feet from the wall, and where you're going to be in the center of the speakers rather than off to the side. If you can set them up in such a way, then yeah, they're absolutely amazing for whatever you're planning to use them for.
I'm actually planning to use them as computer speakers in my home office when I move into my next place. As much as I like the A7Xs I've got set up right now, they're just no match.