BlackTron
Member
Can we go back to a time when people had spines and weren't offended by absolutely everything and ruining things for other people?
When you said spines for a second I thought you were referring to the studios.
Can we go back to a time when people had spines and weren't offended by absolutely everything and ruining things for other people?
He isn't?When you said spines for a second I thought you were referring to the studios.
He isn't?
Depends how you read it,I read it as the devs are ruining the fun of others...I mean they are clearly the spineless ones considering they feel the need to actually censor it in the first place.If you read the rest it sounds like he's referring to the people who get offended and ruin everyone's fun by complaining.
Just making light that everyone here is spineless. Can't handle tits in a game, boohoo, dev candle handle one person crying, changes game.
idk, normally i would be among the first to complain but Japanese game companies have been managing the 'modern audience' much better than their Western counterparts without losing their identity and quality, there is no comparison, we also can't expect them to ignore the west completely.Agreed.
Bandai Namco, Capcom and Square Enix are becoming more and more irrelevant in my eyes. Trying to cater to the west does them no favors.
Depends how you read it,I read it as the devs are ruining the fun of others...I mean they are clearly the spineless ones considering they feel the need to actually censor it in the first place.
I was referring to people, but I mean, devs don’t have spines either. They’re afraid of offending the offended, so they bow down and sacrifice their dignity at the altar of the alphabet mafia. I think a lot of people, devs included, are afraid of the mafia labeling them something stupid and getting ‘canceled’ so they just stay silent and go with it. However, a lot of people are waking up to this nonsense and getting brave and calling out this garbage like they should have been doing years ago.When you said spines for a second I thought you were referring to the studios.
Haha true datI find it hard to believe the people at Capcom are actually offended, but sure the intent could be either way.
edit: whole point is there is so much lack of spine we aren't even sure lol.
No wonder they don't even show Mai in full view on the art. We all know why, "tits are bad".…
Let's face it no one under 30 will have any interest for those type of compilation.I really, REALLY hope Blizzard gives some thought into just having some kind of "mature content filter" toggle or something in the options, because we should be able to enjoy these games as they were, not alter them to suit modern sensibilities.
1. Games have been censored/altered in respect to different regions since the 80s, maybe even more so than today.
2. People are praising chinese games as some saviours against western/japanese censorship? Really? Fucking really?
Show me that chinese game/media that wipes the floor with the chinese oppressive government, its corruption and all its historical atrocities and i'll show you the plethora of western/japanese games/media that do just that (regarding their own demons if i wasn't clear enough), without any censorship.
No they don't. Stop bullshiting to support your argument.Fair enough!
It's all on the recent sites:
Click on most of the games in the collection, they all mention altered animations and/or endings. The same is true of the MvC collection as well.
We have to wait for some "voices" to fall into irrelevanceCan we go back to a time when people had spines and weren't offended by absolutely everything and ruining things for other people?
I know they censored the ending to the punisher but I haven't looked into the rest. I lost interest in that collection when they picked the wrong XvsSF version for it and nerfed Juggernaut in MVC2.Is the marvel vs capcom collection censored too or just CvS collection?
This is highly disappointing sigh. Capcom does something amazing (re-releasing all these classics) and then they have to ruin it like this.
I bought the original Capcom Fighting Collection and had a lot of fun, it was fine.
I bought SVC Chaos and it was totally fine as well.
But I just refunded the MvC collection and remove the Fighting Collection 2 from my wishlist.
This censorship is next level... why wouldn't I just keep the originals?
I need to sit back and wait for people to get their hands on it and then see exactly what is changed. Sigh.
Honestly, I'm just happy they made/will make the FF7 remake trilogy. It was what I wanted from them for the past 20 years. If they go full woke, bon voyage, don't let the door slam you in the ass as you leave my top publishers.Agreed.
Bandai Namco, Capcom and Square Enix are becoming more and more irrelevant in my eyes. Trying to cater to the west does them no favors.
dam i thought sphere hunter was of the good ones oh well.Just like Square, Capcom now has a more rigid Ethics Department and they have been in touch with a lot of LGBT celebrities like Sphere Hunter.
They might not go full DEI, but you wont be seeing half naked chicks anymore.
Removing midnight bliss transformations is absolutely censorship of in-game content. Stages changes are absolutely in-game as well but might indeed not be much but considering CVS1's stages are one of the games big highlights I'd rather they not touch them at all. I imagine the cutscene changes won't be minor but there really isn't much point in speculation at this time. Although since I have these games it might be worth just playing them and trying to guess what it is they're doing for fun.Y'all should actually look at the changes. I've checked 3 so far (Power Stone 1 & 2, Plasma Sword) and none of the changes seem to be censorship of costumes, outfits, or characters in the game. Some of the cutscenes seem to be altered but there is no way to know how and I imagine those changes are minor & non-intrusive.
Actually, a lot of the changes seem to be making once-hidden or unplayable characters playable, which should be a plus.
He could have said, just google it, lol.This may be one of the laziest least helpful instances of someone proving their point when put on the spot to produce evidence.
Big managers for almost any company looks as pirated content as lost sales. Logically that's false, but these people only see large numbers and those numbers should have dollar signs.
These same boneheads see a large number of people yelling on social media as customers. Screw that the word "customer" is very precise in meaning, stating a customer is someone buying a product. Some random person that doesn't play video games isn't a customer. But they can't see that.
Take both concepts and combine. They see large number of yelling people and just like piracy, this is lost sales. So they make products to appease the people that's not their customers. By doing this, they're now making products that alien people that have a significant higher chance of buying their product, because the modern businessman sees all people as customers instead of what they are: potentials.
Concord is a great example. The people that threw a fit were customers, people that actively are buying games, complain and it doesn't sell. But people that throw a fit over Bayonetta aren't affecting the sales of the game. In fact, controversy like that should be good. Check out Stellar Blade. People threw a fit, but not customers. The game sold better than expected.
These CEOs need to grow some balls and understand basic business that you don't need to sell to everyone, you just need to sell to the loyalist of your base. And within that, you might have a few minority screams but the overwhelming majority will not care.
Removing midnight bliss transformations is absolutely censorship of in-game content. Stages changes are absolutely in-game as well but might indeed not be much but considering CVS1's stages are one of the games big highlights I'd rather they not touch them at all. I imagine the cutscene changes won't be minor but there really isn't much point in speculation at this time. Although since I have these games it might be worth just playing them and trying to guess what it is they're doing for fun.
People asking for "comparison screenshots" -- the games aren't out yet, nobody outside Capcom would have the ability to do so. We *can*, however, reference the changes they openly list on the official websites for these collections, some of which specifically outline changing animations and endings for characters that are obviously "sexy" or "lewd" in some way.
I've been a fan of Capcom since I was a kid, so I'm always rooting for them. In many ways, it feels like we're almost in a new "golden age" of Capcom games. But stuff like this just really bothers me; this stuff is totally harmless, and one of the things that makes revisting older games so much fun is seeing how different they actually *are*. Sometimes you watch an older movie and say "man, that would never slide today". And that's not to say modern media is "worse" or anything like that; just acknowledging that tastes have changed.
But if you're bringing back these old games, they should be preserved as they were. Maybe fix game-breaking bugs or things like that, but making alterations to content is some pretty scummy shit. It's like this initiative to censor books without the author's knowledge or consent, reprinting books and removing language like calling people "fat". Like I get it, that might affect your enjoyment of the book, but that's pretty fucked that you're just going to make alterations.
Some transformations but we don't know how many. Could be licensing(Ryu, Rose) , some of the younger transformations, or the usual too sexy for modern audiences but none of them are really that racy.They got rid of Midnight Bliss? Really? Why? They think it'll offend trans people somehow? If anything I'd think they would be fine with it (many of them, anyway), so what if it's a bit tongue-in-cheek.
Yeah, if you can compare both versions for each game I think a lot of us would appreciate it. I don't have original copies of most of these games, sadly. Like my copy of CvS2 on Gamecube is long gone.
They could at least put trigger warnings on the "not modern audience-friendly" content or, better yet, have both the truly original and modified versions in the collection, that way people can actually choose which they prefer.
The wild part is if you ask a lot of women in the FGC, they don't mind the sex appeal of female characters; some even prefer it. These moves from these companies always end up looking socially regressive and borne out of outdated ideals the Taliban love to support.
People asking for "comparison screenshots" -- the games aren't out yet, nobody outside Capcom would have the ability to do so. We *can*, however, reference the changes they openly list on the official websites for these collections, some of which specifically outline changing animations and endings for characters that are obviously "sexy" or "lewd" in some way.
I'll still get it, but it is a shit practice. Mostly because of a loud group usually from America. Thanks for your DEI rubbish and exporting it.
It's hilarious though because walking around some areas of big western cities like New York and London and you'll see chicks in very revealing clothes regularly in the summer.
Stop hiring activists.
This genuinely upsets me.
I've been so stoked to see Capcom announcing all these awesome collections lately, but it has really been tempered by seeing that they're altering animations and endings for almost all of these old games, presumably to remove any scantily-clad female characters.
This seems to align with their stance of more recent Capcom games shying away from sexualizing female characters. Which for newer games, makes sense as that's sort of where "the industry" is at unfortunately. The new Dead Rising remake has turned Frank West into a middle-aged doofus (as opposed to a mid-20's doofus), and it's already pretty apparent they're scaling back on the scantily-clad zombies that once populated the game.
But when you're selling players on these original experiences, I think it's incredibly slimy to make alterations to those games in the name of appealing to "modern audiences". Fact is, whatever your thoughts are, those animations and endings are part of those original games, and likely part of what lent them their charm.
That stuff is juvenile, for sure. But these are video games; it should be okay to have games that are a little juvenile. With as shitty as the real world has been on folks the past few years, some of us might enjoy the escapism of not having to take everything so goddamn seriously all the time.
I really, REALLY hope Blizzard gives some thought into just having some kind of "mature content filter" toggle or something in the options, because we should be able to enjoy these games as they were, not alter them to suit modern sensibilities.
EDIT:
Here's the official site for the most recent collection; click on any of the games, almost all of them mention altered animations or endings under changes: