The NCAA saw his videos as a direct violation to its rule that prohibits student athletes from using their status to earn money. UCF's athletics department negotiated with the association, since De La Haye sends the money he earns from YouTube to his family in Costa Rica. The association gave him two choices: he can keep the account monetized, but he has to stop referencing his status as a student athlete and move the videos wherein he does. Or, he has to stop monetizing his account altogether. Since De La Haye chose not to accept either option, he has been declared inelegible to play in any NCAA-sanctioned competition, effectively ending his college football career.
The NCAA has defended its decision in a statement, stating that De La Haye "could have continued playing football for the university and earn money from non-athletic YouTube videos" based on the deal it cut with UCF. It sounds like De La Haye firmly stands by his decision, though. Despite initially showing his dismay on Twitter and YouTube, he criticized the NCAA and advised his followers to "always stand up for what [they] believe in." He also told Sports Illustrated last month that he feels "like it's about time for things to be changed," since the associated created its rules before the time of social media and video platforms.
https://youtu.be/Fh69-X6X55w
https://www.engadget.com/2017/07/31/college-football-player-loses-scholarship-youtube/
I know big corporation controlling people etc. They are bullies and all that but this is your education. He could have still make videos but not monetize it.
It is good to have principals and able to stand up for something you truly believe in but I would have just not monetize and get scholarship money. You can still build fans and do what you want.
Now he wants donations for college:
What would you have done?