Disney•Pixar Up - May 29, 2009

Status
Not open for further replies.
dreyfus.gif

skyfinch said:
I wanna reverse cowboy Pixar and let them look at my ass as I bounce up and down their shaft.

zy7c4n.gif

Costanza said:
"THAT WAS YOU ON THE TAPE?!"
 
This reminds me, does GAF have an official Animation of 2009 thread? I mean, specifically animated films and we talk about them. The only ones I know of coming out this year are this and 9. Any others??
 
ZephyrFate said:
This reminds me, does GAF have an official Animation of 2009 thread? I mean, specifically animated films and we talk about them. The only ones I know of coming out this year are this and 9. Any others??

9
Astro Boy
A Christmas Carol
Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs
Coraline
The Fantastic Mr. Fox
Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs
Monsters vs Aliens
Planet 51
Ponyo on the Cliff by the Sea
The Princess and the Frog
Toy Story 3D
Up

Plus a few independents and anime I'm sure.
 
Timbuktu said:
Is Wall-E even a lock for this year? If Waltz with Bashir is eligible, there might be a slight chance the it won't get it.
It's even more of a lock for Best Animated Feature than Heath Ledger is for Best Supporting Actor to be honest.
 
This is going to be Pixar's hardest to market film yet, I can imagine, even more so than Ratatoulle. I don't think any kids are going to want to buy toys of an old git.

Not that I'm complaining, I'm glad Pixar is taking their position as an opportunity to create daring and unique movies (at least compared to just about everything else being put out by the big CGI studios), like they did with Wall-E in particular.

I've said it every time a Pixar film has been on it's way, but I want to see as little of this movie as possible so it'll be all surprises when I see it. I wanted to do this with Wall-E but I ended up digging up every scrap of new footage online I could find from TV previews and the like. :lol

Still, quite a few animated films this year Im interested in like Coraline, Astro Boy, The Princess and the Frog and Ponyo.
 
borghe said:
You mean like every other release they've won the Animation Oscar for since it's inception except for 2001 (Shrek over Monsters??? really????) and 2006 (Happy Feet over Cars is a bit of a stretch, but it was Cars after all)

Monsters Inc is a lovely movie, should have won for sure.

Happy Feet I didn't care for, but Cars was pretty meh.
 
Pixar is much like how Disney was back in the late 40s and the entire 50s. Every new release by them was groundbreaking, innovative, and exciting. I'm thankful Pixar has the balls to take chances and execute them, instead of sticking to easy material full of pop culture references and a focused audience (Dreamworks, I'm looking at you). Pixar appeals to everyone, much like how Disney used to be.

They're the most talented film company out there. I still believe Wall-E deserves a Best Picture Nomination AND the win. It'll probably rank as my first or second favorite animated film of all time.

edit: Although Cars sucked.
 
Instigator said:
Finally saw Cars two days ago.

I still don't get the GAF hate for that movie.


Neither do I, I enjoyed it more then either the original toy story or bugs life to be honest. I think people hate it because it's the most commercial of all of pixar's films and because it's more popular with kids because of that. At it's worst it's still a 4 star film in a field filled with 4 and 5 star movies.


I'm interested in UP, even when a pixar movie looks iffy I usually still end up enjoying it so I"ll be there may 29th. After kung fu panda I may even check out monsters vs aliens too.
 
They gotta turn off the random cgi movie generator, seems like they've just been pumping them out lately.
 
I didn't like the cast, I find the idea of automobiles acting as protagonists a little too much of a stress even for an animated movie, and I just don't like NASCAR or cars in general. Also, I thought it was boring without a very touching message, unlike most other Pixar movies.
They gotta turn off the random cgi movie generator, seems like they've just been pumping them out lately.

Tell that to fucking Dreamworks, not Pixar.
 
BrandNew said:
Pixar is much like how Disney was back in the late 40s and the entire 50s. Every new release by them was groundbreaking, innovative, and exciting. I'm thankful Pixar has the balls to take chances and execute them, instead of sticking to easy material full of pop culture references and a focused audience (Dreamworks, I'm looking at you). Pixar appeals to everyone, much like how Disney used to be.

They're the most talented film company out there. I still believe Wall-E deserves a Best Picture Nomination AND the win. It'll probably rank as my first or second favorite animated film of all time.

edit: Although Cars sucked.

Agree with 95% of your post. Except the Cars part. Cars is great.

Up looks like another notch on their flawless record. Bought Wall E last night on Blu-ray, holy fuck it looks amazing.

Great movie.
 
borghe said:
You mean like every other release they've won the Animation Oscar for since it's inception except for 2001 (Shrek over Monsters??? really????) and 2006 (Happy Feet over Cars is a bit of a stretch, but it was Cars after all)
What the fuck? Happy Feet? Fucking Happy Feet? What the fuck.
 
Gagaman said:
This is going to be Pixar's hardest to market film yet, I can imagine, even more so than Ratatoulle. I don't think any kids are going to want to buy toys of an old git.

Not that I'm complaining, I'm glad Pixar is taking their position as an opportunity to create daring and unique movies (at least compared to just about everything else being put out by the big CGI studios), like they did with Wall-E in particular.

I've said it every time a Pixar film has been on it's way, but I want to see as little of this movie as possible so it'll be all surprises when I see it. I wanted to do this with Wall-E but I ended up digging up every scrap of new footage online I could find from TV previews and the like. :lol

Still, quite a few animated films this year Im interested in like Coraline, Astro Boy, The Princess and the Frog and Ponyo.
kids aren't going to see a movie about rats, right

kids aren't going to see a movie without dialogue, right

Kids will watch Pixar
 
Not feeling the movie at all with these short trailers. I'm not a big fan of Pixar humans. I'm getting a Howls Moving Castle vibe but I'm not liking the old man and fat ass boy. However, it's Pixar, so I'm sure it'll be quality.
 
Pixar in 3D?

DAY FUCKING 1 at the EL CAPITAN bitches

Oh and Cars isn't a shitty movie, just relatively shitty compared to all the other Pixar movies.
 
Zaro said:
They gotta turn off the random cgi movie generator, seems like they've just been pumping them out lately.
If this was a Sony Pictures Animation or Blue Sky production, I'd agree. But this is fucking Pixar, so STFU.

It's always these people who complain that some genuinely original movie like this is nothing new and doesn't look good and then they go to see Max Payne and Paul Blart: Mall Cop.
 
Zaro said:
They gotta turn off the random cgi movie generator, seems like they've just been pumping them out lately.
Indeed, they should do Toy Story 3, and then Finding Nemo 2.

Maybe a WALL-E spinoff.

Milk the movies for all they're worth, who cares about original screenplays?
 
Meh. Watched the trailer and not finding myself giving a shit about this movie. I generally love Pixar movies, though.
 
I am finding myself more and more excited with this movie each day I wait. I love Pixar's animation, voice acting talents and musical score. I will always care more about those aspects more than the plot. At least until I go for second and third views. Somehow Pixar combines my love for wonderful visuals and directing, amazing voice casts and musical scores and always does a great job.

9 looks equally good in those departments, too. Good year for animation.

Edit: Admittedly not as thrilled with "Up is an upcoming computer-animated 3-D film being produced by Pixar Animation Studios. It will be distributed by Walt Disney Pictures, and is scheduled for release on May 29, 2009 in North America and October 16, 2009 in the United Kingdom."
 
Buckethead said:
Hope this is okay to post.
New footage (however still using temp audio tracks) from Sony's Keynote @ CES, notice Lou Romano playing Russell and I don't recognize the voice playing Carl.

New footage:
http://vimeo.com/2897615

Pictures:
http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/live-from-howard-stringers-ces-keynote/
This is the footage that was shown at ComiCon in July of 2008. Same placeholder voices, too. They must just have a DVD of specific scenes to show off that they carry around with them to press functions.


Drozmight said:
Is this a remake? I swore there was a live action.
....no
 
Drozmight said:
Is this a remake? I swore there was a live action.

There was a live action movie that followed the story of a young asian boy and an old man as they traveled to the Amazon to go on a fantastic adventure in the old man's house that flew thanks to thousands of balloons?

If so, where? :lol

WordAssassin said:
This is the footage that was shown at ComiCon in July of 2008. Same placeholder voices, too. They must just have a DVD of specific scenes to show off that they carry around with them to press functions.

Gotcha, must have missed out on the than then. Oh well.
 
Dan said:
Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs

I have nice memories of the book as a kid, but I made the mistake of wanting to see what the movie would be like. There isn't a facepalm big enough.
 
Gagaman said:
This is going to be Pixar's hardest to market film yet, I can imagine, even more so than Ratatoulle. I don't think any kids are going to want to buy toys of an old git.

Not that I'm complaining, I'm glad Pixar is taking their position as an opportunity to create daring and unique movies (at least compared to just about everything else being put out by the big CGI studios), like they did with Wall-E in particular.

I've said it every time a Pixar film has been on it's way, but I want to see as little of this movie as possible so it'll be all surprises when I see it. I wanted to do this with Wall-E but I ended up digging up every scrap of new footage online I could find from TV previews and the like. :lol

Still, quite a few animated films this year Im interested in like Coraline, Astro Boy, The Princess and the Frog and Ponyo.

I think once they start to show off more about the storyline you'll see that they should have no problems marketing the movie.
 
adamsappel said:
But, in animation, don't they do the voices first?

I would imagine they're still mixing and editing the audio. Those placeholder voices were probably recorded even before the professional talent was cast.
 
adamsappel said:
But, in animation, don't they do the voices first?
Yes, but because Pixar works with 3D what can easily be gone back to and tweaked, they can animate everything to stand-in audio and then just tweak the lip-sync once they have the final audio. If you watch the two clips of Carl and Russel pulling the house, there are already changes to what the stand-in says VS the line that's in the actual movie.

And sometimes the stand-in voices get chosen to be the real voices. That's how Lou Romano got cast as Linguine after all. :D
 
bartris said:
Not always at Pixar, yes for TV Shows like the Simpsons etc and I imagine Hand Drawn theatrical releases.

Voicework is always done first at Pixar once put into Production.

However when ideas are changed and refined once in Production, they have to re-record. I think that this is one of those scenes or it could be a test scene that they animated early on. Sometimes the essential idea is locked in, however they need to do lighting tests or cloth physics before they are in intensive production, hence the scratch voices. For example on Nemo they needed to get the "ocean look" right before they went into Production and they wouldn't call down Brooks or Degeneres just for a test.

They are in Pre-Production for a good 2 years hammering out the story. This is where the "scratch" dialogue and voices come from. Then once the story is "locked in" they start production for 2 years until the movie is released.

Basically:

PRE-PRODUCTION
-Idea Pitch to "Brain Trust"
-First Draft from Writer/Director
-Draft refined with Brain Trust multiple times

-Story boarding w/ Story Department
-Meetings with Art + Lighting Department
-Group Meeting

-Movie Cast, Staff Set
-Script Finalized
-Production Schedule Set

Then they start Production and record the voices while animators are thinking on their own about what they want to bring to the character. Having the voices however, help animators make the performances genuine and natural. Obviously it's counter-productive to have animators start animating before they hear the voice acting. Usually the director and story lead have people in mind, and they try to get that person for the movie. IE: Bob in The Incredibles was always pitched as a "Craig T type..".

It's cost-effective and just generally smart to do it that way. Anyway probably over-elaborated, but what the hey.
 
I believe two of the spill guys got a chance to see this movie. Not to sound too much like i'm easily swayable by their opinion (they are after all a couple of regular ass, quite homophobic dudes), but the sheer level of giddyness these fools display having seen just the first 45 minutes of the film (with half of it being storyboards)...I gotta bump up the excitement list from rent levels to at maybe first or second weekend.
 
Kritz said:
Edit: Admittedly not as thrilled with "Up is an upcoming computer-animated 3-D film being produced by Pixar Animation Studios. It will be distributed by Walt Disney Pictures, and is scheduled for release on May 29, 2009 in North America and October 16, 2009 in the United Kingdom."


If Disney keep up this stupid scheduling I'll just keep buying the US blurays and saving a ton of cash compared to taking the family to the cinema.

Whats that? Autumn half term?
May 29 is early enough to have it out for the summer holidays in the UK.
 
mrklaw said:
If Disney keep up this stupid scheduling I'll just keep buying the US blurays and saving a ton of cash compared to taking the family to the cinema.

Whats that? Autumn half term?
May 29 is early enough to have it out for the summer holidays in the UK.
I hear ya, though, Australia finally caught a break on this one, June 10 for the moment. I don't doubt that Disney Australia will try to delay it till early September though.
 
bartris said:
I hear ya, though, Australia finally caught a break on this one, June 10 for the moment. I don't doubt that Disney Australia will try to delay it till early September though.

This time last year, Wall-E had an Aus date around July, and we know what happened there. Just you watch. :(
 
Buckethead said:
There was a live action movie that followed the story of a young asian boy and an old man as they traveled to the Amazon to go on a fantastic adventure in the old man's house that flew thanks to thousands of balloons?

If so, where? :lol
He's probably thinking of that movie with Rhys Ifans (think it was him) about the guy in the lawnchair floating away with the balloons. Came out a few years ago.

Back to the topic at hand, May 29 can't come soon enough!
 
I've always heard that you learn something new everyday. Well if Wijipedia is to believed..I learned something new today. The original idea for Monsters, Inc. Was that and old man discovers a monster in his closet who scared him during his childhood. They ended up going with Boo(Mary) and are now going with the old man as the main character.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom