skyfinch said:I wanna reverse cowboy Pixar and let them look at my ass as I bounce up and down their shaft.
Costanza said:"THAT WAS YOU ON THE TAPE?!"
ZephyrFate said:This reminds me, does GAF have an official Animation of 2009 thread? I mean, specifically animated films and we talk about them. The only ones I know of coming out this year are this and 9. Any others??
It's even more of a lock for Best Animated Feature than Heath Ledger is for Best Supporting Actor to be honest.Timbuktu said:Is Wall-E even a lock for this year? If Waltz with Bashir is eligible, there might be a slight chance the it won't get it.
borghe said:You mean like every other release they've won the Animation Oscar for since it's inception except for 2001 (Shrek over Monsters??? really????) and 2006 (Happy Feet over Cars is a bit of a stretch, but it was Cars after all)
BrandNew said:edit: Although Cars sucked.
Instigator said:Finally saw Cars two days ago.
I still don't get the GAF hate for that movie.
They gotta turn off the random cgi movie generator, seems like they've just been pumping them out lately.
BrandNew said:Pixar is much like how Disney was back in the late 40s and the entire 50s. Every new release by them was groundbreaking, innovative, and exciting. I'm thankful Pixar has the balls to take chances and execute them, instead of sticking to easy material full of pop culture references and a focused audience (Dreamworks, I'm looking at you). Pixar appeals to everyone, much like how Disney used to be.
They're the most talented film company out there. I still believe Wall-E deserves a Best Picture Nomination AND the win. It'll probably rank as my first or second favorite animated film of all time.
edit: Although Cars sucked.
What the fuck? Happy Feet? Fucking Happy Feet? What the fuck.borghe said:You mean like every other release they've won the Animation Oscar for since it's inception except for 2001 (Shrek over Monsters??? really????) and 2006 (Happy Feet over Cars is a bit of a stretch, but it was Cars after all)
kids aren't going to see a movie about rats, rightGagaman said:This is going to be Pixar's hardest to market film yet, I can imagine, even more so than Ratatoulle. I don't think any kids are going to want to buy toys of an old git.
Not that I'm complaining, I'm glad Pixar is taking their position as an opportunity to create daring and unique movies (at least compared to just about everything else being put out by the big CGI studios), like they did with Wall-E in particular.
I've said it every time a Pixar film has been on it's way, but I want to see as little of this movie as possible so it'll be all surprises when I see it. I wanted to do this with Wall-E but I ended up digging up every scrap of new footage online I could find from TV previews and the like. :lol
Still, quite a few animated films this year Im interested in like Coraline, Astro Boy, The Princess and the Frog and Ponyo.
Instigator said:Finally saw Cars two days ago.
I still don't get the GAF hate for that movie.
If this was a Sony Pictures Animation or Blue Sky production, I'd agree. But this is fucking Pixar, so STFU.Zaro said:They gotta turn off the random cgi movie generator, seems like they've just been pumping them out lately.
Indeed, they should do Toy Story 3, and then Finding Nemo 2.Zaro said:They gotta turn off the random cgi movie generator, seems like they've just been pumping them out lately.
Pixar trailers are ALWAYS ass.MIMIC said:Meh. Watched the trailer and not finding myself giving a shit about this movie. I generally love Pixar movies, though.
This is the footage that was shown at ComiCon in July of 2008. Same placeholder voices, too. They must just have a DVD of specific scenes to show off that they carry around with them to press functions.Buckethead said:Hope this is okay to post.
New footage (however still using temp audio tracks) from Sony's Keynote @ CES, notice Lou Romano playing Russell and I don't recognize the voice playing Carl.
New footage:
http://vimeo.com/2897615
Pictures:
http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/live-from-howard-stringers-ces-keynote/
....noDrozmight said:Is this a remake? I swore there was a live action.
Drozmight said:Is this a remake? I swore there was a live action.
WordAssassin said:This is the footage that was shown at ComiCon in July of 2008. Same placeholder voices, too. They must just have a DVD of specific scenes to show off that they carry around with them to press functions.
Don't feel bad, I don't think it ever leaked onto the web. I was just guessing as to why the real voices aren't there yet.Buckethead said:Gotcha, must have missed out on the than then. Oh well.
Dan said:Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs
Gagaman said:This is going to be Pixar's hardest to market film yet, I can imagine, even more so than Ratatoulle. I don't think any kids are going to want to buy toys of an old git.
Not that I'm complaining, I'm glad Pixar is taking their position as an opportunity to create daring and unique movies (at least compared to just about everything else being put out by the big CGI studios), like they did with Wall-E in particular.
I've said it every time a Pixar film has been on it's way, but I want to see as little of this movie as possible so it'll be all surprises when I see it. I wanted to do this with Wall-E but I ended up digging up every scrap of new footage online I could find from TV previews and the like. :lol
Still, quite a few animated films this year Im interested in like Coraline, Astro Boy, The Princess and the Frog and Ponyo.
But, in animation, don't they do the voices first?WordAssassin said:Don't feel bad, I don't think it ever leaked onto the web. I was just guessing as to why the real voices aren't there yet.
adamsappel said:But, in animation, don't they do the voices first?
Not always at Pixar, yes for TV Shows like the Simpsons etc and I imagine Hand Drawn theatrical releases.adamsappel said:But, in animation, don't they do the voices first?
Yes, but because Pixar works with 3D what can easily be gone back to and tweaked, they can animate everything to stand-in audio and then just tweak the lip-sync once they have the final audio. If you watch the two clips of Carl and Russel pulling the house, there are already changes to what the stand-in says VS the line that's in the actual movie.adamsappel said:But, in animation, don't they do the voices first?
bartris said:Not always at Pixar, yes for TV Shows like the Simpsons etc and I imagine Hand Drawn theatrical releases.
Kritz said:Edit: Admittedly not as thrilled with "Up is an upcoming computer-animated 3-D film being produced by Pixar Animation Studios. It will be distributed by Walt Disney Pictures, and is scheduled for release on May 29, 2009 in North America and October 16, 2009 in the United Kingdom."
I hear ya, though, Australia finally caught a break on this one, June 10 for the moment. I don't doubt that Disney Australia will try to delay it till early September though.mrklaw said:If Disney keep up this stupid scheduling I'll just keep buying the US blurays and saving a ton of cash compared to taking the family to the cinema.
Whats that? Autumn half term?
May 29 is early enough to have it out for the summer holidays in the UK.
bartris said:I hear ya, though, Australia finally caught a break on this one, June 10 for the moment. I don't doubt that Disney Australia will try to delay it till early September though.
He's probably thinking of that movie with Rhys Ifans (think it was him) about the guy in the lawnchair floating away with the balloons. Came out a few years ago.Buckethead said:There was a live action movie that followed the story of a young asian boy and an old man as they traveled to the Amazon to go on a fantastic adventure in the old man's house that flew thanks to thousands of balloons?
If so, where? :lol