The Doc opens up regarding his ban, at least what little he can talk about.
Who’s Tim?Doc and Tim are the only streamers I can deal with watching
such a good guyLol the replies to people's support messages are funny. I can't believe they think anxiety dies or doesn't exist just because you have money.
Who’s Tim?
Oh yeah, I’m pretty casual but I remember. Seemed like Docs cuck tho.TimtheTatman use to plays with doc
I didnt read the news, do we know why this guy was banned?
Oh yeah, I’m pretty casual but I remember. Seemed like Docs cuck tho.
But then aren’t we all.
He broke Twitch's TOS. If you read the news, it will tell you.![]()
So how many viewers is he putting up regular on youtube?
That's impressive. Will be interesting to see if he kickstarts a youtube gaming upswing.72k in the area at the moment.
So how many viewers is he putting up regular on youtube?
he says he still doesn't know and it's giving him anxiety
![]()
Dr. Disrespect says he's dealing with anxiety because of his Twitch ban
He also still doesn't know why he was kicked off the platform.www.pcgamer.com
Twitch did say he violated the TOS back in June but wasn't specific about it.
That's impressive. Will be interesting to see if he kickstarts a youtube gaming upswing.
The fact that theyve said nothing is a huge red flag towards twitch at this point. Ive never once seen a high profile streamer get banned without a reason being publicly announced. I cant think of one time except this one.
Heres what im positive happened: Twitch saw that Mixer died and money bags werent gonna be thrown around anymore. They knew that those streamers would very likely come back to twitch (shroud, Ninja, Ewok, etc) so they started to wonder why they even gave Doc the big bucks to begin with. So because they have extremely loose TOS, they cancelled his contract to get out of paying him and said nothing, knowing that everyone would just believe that Doc did something stupid again.
Now theyre probably in court fighting for him to get paid, so they probably cant say anything now anyway.
I think they fucked him over. And they know people still remember that toilet incident so they'll all just believe he did something again.
And why is this thread still going? Damn
If I was a mid-tier streamer, I would not be excited about my contract prospects with Twitch, tbh. If they will kick Doc out without real notice, anyone is fair game.
You also would have the advantage of flying under the radar!If I was a mid-tier streamer, I would not be excited about my contract prospects with Twitch, tbh. If they will kick Doc out without real notice, anyone is fair game.
HoegLaw 's theory was always that, following the failure of Mixer, Twitch kicked out Dr. Disrespect to free up resources for a more attractive streamer.
Well:
I swear that freakshow, also know as the Twitch community team, had a say in Doc getting cancelled.
I dont even know what that means.Maybe Doc said something cervidaphobic?
Maybe some of them are secretly deers.I dont even know what that means.![]()
Someone on the Twitch advisery council has mental health issues. They think they are a deer person and orgasms when people scratch him. It's really fucked up and gross.I dont even know what that means.![]()
Doc should fire everyone involved in getting him that Twitch contract if it allowed for him to just lose it without explanation at any time based on a flimsy "TOS violation" excuse without the need to even specifically state what the violation was.
Even Ninja and Shroud got fully paid out on their Mixer contracts without even having to stream anymore. So the people who put those contracts together knew what they were doing. Doc's contract must have been so shitty that it allowed for Twitch to just stop paying him any time they felt like it.
But doesn't it seem like the contracts that Ninja and Shroud had must have been better? At least in the sense that it was less worth fucking them over and making them come after the rest of the "guaranteed" money because it was so much more clear based on the wording of the contracts that they would win anyway?There isn't anything even the best lawyers in the world can do to stop one party or the other from doing what they will. ("It's just words on the page" is how I tend to explain contracts to clients.) All those lawyers can do in those contracts is give you the weaponry you need to fight bad acts. I have little doubt that Dr. Disrespect's contract had specific breach requirements, but even if Twitch used a pretextual reason, the Disrespect team would then have to go fight for his funds. A fight which would be publicly silent in much the way we are presently observing.
Words can be manipulated. That's what the lawyers are for (on either side).But doesn't it seem like the contracts that Ninja and Shroud had must have been better? At least in the sense that it was less worth fucking them over and making them come after the rest of the "guaranteed" money because it was so much more clear based on the wording of the contracts that they would win anyway?
I'm just trying to understand why one party gets a contract honored and another party is told, "Bring your best lawyers and see if you can get even a fraction of what we guaranteed you." Twitch must feel like the wording helps their positioning in an inevitable legal battle compared to Microsoft/Facebook (after acquisition) who just paid out in full.
For a lot of the big streamers playing with other streamers and being able to compete in tournaments is a huge part of building their brand. Right now Doc is missing out. Even if he can find good success on YouTube, the Twitch ban still hampers his opportunities.
What keeps them from competing with each other still. Is it a pre-requisite to be on the same streaming platform to compete?
IIRC Twitch streamers aren't allowed to feature banned streamers in their own streams.What keeps them from competing with each other still. Is it a pre-requisite to be on the same streaming platform to compete?
Partnered Twitch streamers can't stream with Doc since he is banned. For day to day streaming that kills opportunities to stream with people Shroud, Timthetatman, Nickmercs, etc. Solo streams get views but streaming with another popular streamer does help elevate those numbers.What keeps them from competing with each other still. Is it a pre-requisite to be on the same streaming platform to compete?
Partnered Twitch streamers can't stream with Doc since he is banned. For day to day streaming that kills opportunities to stream with people Shroud, Timthetatman, Nickmercs, etc. Solo streams get views but streaming with another popular streamer does help elevate those numbers.
If he is in a Warzone Duos tournament he can't be paired with anyone on the Twitch platform. For tournaments where teams are randomly assigned that adds complexity. That limits him to people on YouTube and Facebook. There are only a handful of other big streamers on those platforms. Skill is one thing, but clout is another. That's how most people find partners-otherwise you are largely reliant on knowing someone at that skill level who doesn't stream. That's really limiting for him but not insurmountable.
What really kills it is when a sponsored tournament is being broadcast on Twitch. A lot of brands will actually broadcast/commentate their tournament from their official Twitch page. When they do that, that automatically makes Doc ineligible.
Partnered Twitch streamers can't stream with Doc since he is banned. For day to day streaming that kills opportunities to stream with people Shroud, Timthetatman, Nickmercs, etc. Solo streams get views but streaming with another popular streamer does help elevate those numbers.
If he is in a Warzone Duos tournament he can't be paired with anyone on the Twitch platform. For tournaments where teams are randomly assigned that adds complexity. That limits him to people on YouTube and Facebook. There are only a handful of other big streamers on those platforms. Skill is one thing, but clout is another. That's how most people find partners-otherwise you are largely reliant on knowing someone at that skill level who doesn't stream. That's really limiting for him but not insurmountable.
What really kills it is when a sponsored tournament is being broadcast on Twitch. A lot of brands will actually broadcast/commentate their tournament from their official Twitch page. When they do that, that automatically makes Doc ineligible.
But he is not streaming on Twitch, so unless they have a cam of him on the Twitch streamer side, how can this be enforced. Most streams have the cam of the streamer and noone else. I guess you could still get his voice comms, but that seems like shaky ground for the Twitch streamer to get in trouble. Granted they may want to be on the good graces of Twitch, but would that strictly be prohibited by the TOS.
I know that several streamers regularly have people on voice comms that don't stream at all.
What I'm saying is that most of those players are probably gaming via Steam and most likely using a voice service like Discord, so not even using Twitch other than a medium to broadcast.
I don't really know the Twitch rules, but would find it surprising that it goes that in depth.
But doesn't it seem like the contracts that Ninja and Shroud had must have been better? At least in the sense that it was less worth fucking them over and making them come after the rest of the "guaranteed" money because it was so much more clear based on the wording of the contracts that they would win anyway?
I'm just trying to understand why one party gets a contract honored and another party is told, "Bring your best lawyers and see if you can get even a fraction of what we guaranteed you." Twitch must feel like the wording helps their positioning in an inevitable legal battle compared to Microsoft/Facebook (after acquisition) who just paid out in full.