She writes songs, she can actually sing, and she's in good with almost everyone who matters in the record and fashion industries. I feel like she'll do alright. Especially in a culture that goes totally fuckballs for celebrities and spectacles and fads. I mean, reinvention is sort of her thing.
Every time I hear her sit down at a piano and just sing, I'm impressed. Even if she manages to burn all her bridges and destroy her commercial prospects with major labels, I don't see her going away. She's made enough of a name for herself that she could go the indie route, scale back her...well, everything, and coast on her talent and established fanbase with the power of the internets.
Interestingly, for an artist that prides herself on this avant-garde/arty image, her music is bereft of what makes her image interesting. Beyonce's self-titled record is more musically and thematically adventurous and interesting than Artpop (or any of Gaga's output) and it managed to shame it in sales. Funny how that worked.
Probably to sing and entertain?Then why is she a singer? If she's stepping to the plate, shouldn't you expect to judge her?
Then why is she a singer? If she's stepping to the plate, shouldn't you expect to judge her?
I think that's always been her biggest problem, ever since her Fame days when she promoted the album as thematically robust but ended up having lots of songs about dicks and partying and such. She's always been good at finding a catchy hook, though, and she does seem to get more inventive and experimental with every release. Born This Way is a grab bag of nostalgic tracks, anthems, and oddball pieces that hold up surprisingly well, I've found. (Except for a few things, like Judas. That song was awful from day one. Jesus damn.) Artpop is a more consistent but equally diverse album that I enjoy almost as much as The Fame Monster.Interestingly, for an artist that prides herself on this avant-garde/arty image, her music is bereft of what makes her image interesting. Beyonce's self-titled record is more musically and thematically adventurous and interesting than Artpop (or any of Gaga's output) and it managed to shame it in sales. Funny how that worked.
Stefan;95351476 said:Good for Beyonce. I still prefer Artpop over her self-titled album.
And there's the tea. Gaga's bag of tricks is running empty, and without the spectacle the burden is on the music. ARTPOP is not an album that can carry that burden.
She needs to do more than just turn up in a weird costume for her next album if it's as patchy as ARTPOP. Or she needs to go listen to The Fame Monster a few more times and remind herself how to write strong, consistent, thematically interesting bops.
She looks OK in her videos but in public she turns into a goblin. Good album though.That Lorde girl is supposed to be 17? She looks like she's on her early thirties.
in the end i don't even know what this amounted toBut godels, what about our reverse Warholian expedition"?
in the end i don't even know what this amounted to
was it just putting a couple of pieces of art on the album cover and namedropping a couple of roman gods in song lyrics?
even kylie managed to do that better if so
Both Janelle and Gaga are fully realized conceptual artists and you're deluding yourself in thinking that Gaga isn't as fleshed out as Janelle. Their art is just different. Janelle's work is incredibly intellectualized; it's seeping with commentary on class and politics and because of that her big ideas translate to well-spoken execution. That's exactly her intent. Her ideas wouldn't translate into esoteric structures because, well, that's not her thing.
Gaga is Warholian. It's ideas pertaining to pop culture being interpreted through a very simplified execution. Her work isn't intellectualized like Janelle. because it's not supposed to be. Her talking about her art in an intellectualized way just means that she's well-spoken; it doesn't mean that her art matches her vocabulary. You'd be lucky to find cubist, pop art or surrealist artists who don't talk eloquently about their work.
You guys gave me shit for saying that some people are misunderstanding Gaga's intent, assuming that I was saying that in a smug way, but I wasn't. I do honestly think that people misunderstand her intent because they assume that because she's well spoken about herself, that her execution must not be esoteric. Except that's always been her style. I guess this is all subjective anyway... I only get defense about it because I've seen this kind of criticism thrown toward things like pop art quite a bit.
The only attempt at explaining it that I have read was Soulscribe's:
That Lorde girl is supposed to be 17? She looks like she's on her early thirties.
would someone do that; troll pop artists?have you two ever considered that soulscribe is simply a troll
I'm a little less gay, thanksI thought freenudemacusers and Escape Goat were the same poster
have you two ever considered that soulscribe is simply a troll
I thought freenudemacusers and Escape Goat were the same poster
I'm a little less gay, thanks
Sold 260k in its first week - less than Beyonce's, Katy's, Miley's, Rihanna's, and Madonna's last efforts' first weeks.
It's 2nd week drop was 82%/83% - the biggest drop of 2013, and the 4th biggest drop of all time.
After its first week, its weekly sales have been less than the Duck Dynasty Christmas album.
Critical reception has also been very low - 61 on Metacritic compared to 71, 78, and 71 from her first three albums.
The Fame and Born This Way got the same metacritic score? Ahaha.
mumei now is not the time
popGAF is always scary in justifying their favorite singers.
For someone to come out of the blue and blow up in sales like that vs Gaga who marketed her album to hell and back only to get lukewarm reception is crazy though. This thread seems awfully salty all the same.
They went in that one direction.
The tears of Gaga fans are luxurious while Whitney has passed down the crown
That section on rock music explains why there are so many bitter old people on youtube complaining that there's no good rock anymore, cause it just doesn't come up in these pop charts to be fed down their gullets so it feed their confirmation bias.
I'm totally out of the loop if that's the kind of rock music that sells.
I wish Kinski, Young Knives, Chelsea Light Moving, God Is An Astronaut, Tomahawk, Savages, QOTSA, Haken, Iceage, or Clutch were super popular but hey I'm not in marketing so it's not my job to make these rock acts popular. Just enjoy what you're into, recommend to others, search for new stuff, get the word of mouth out.
Would not bang. What the hell is this?
Would not bang. What the hell is this?
Would not bang. What the hell is this?
for me part of the problem is how you discern actual potential from looks-like-potential-because-of-fluke
the further we get away from TFM the less it looks like gaga had the former and more it looks like she had the latter
It would honestly be difficult for me to put together a more wretched group of artists than what you listed. Maddeningly terrible music. There is plenty of good rock out there though.
A new 17-year-old indie pop sensation from New Zealand. Her hit song Royals SLAYED the charts staying #1 on the Billboard Hot 100 for two months and has recently received 4 Grammy Nominations (including Song and Record of the Year). Her excellent debut album Pure Heroine went gold and received very favorable reviews from music critics. In other words, the LORDE and Savior of pop is here.
Who the F is Lorde?
Then why oh why does every radio mix everywhere get that many gaga's songs ? I personally can't stand her voice or music. It is cringe worthy.
Miley and Beyoncé are awesome. Perry even. Gaga is killing my ears.