Schattenjäger;237748047 said:
It was his last "official" release
Madvillain throwaway
Give me DoomStarks already wtf
I know, Angels was fire. I need more of that in my life right now, new Gorillaz and Iggy Pop is not enough.
Honestly, I would even take a lo-fi effort from him that is more back to basics, like I need more MF DOOM in my life.
I listen to plenty. I choose to give money to artists who actually show up to concerts instead of sending fakes.
That has nothing to do with actually listening to music, and you know what I mean. You could still choose to just listen to studio albums, which is something I do because I have several anxiety disorders and issues with large crowds. The thing is, I prefer the studio performance because there is no variation. It always sounds like I expect it to.
Now I don't expect anyone to be beholden to the same rule, I'm just saying appreciation of music is about the artist and not necessarily about ethics or politics.
I understand that you have a personal grievance, that is cool man that is fine, but you can't disregard the entire mans legacy because he used a body double, was absent, or too drunk on a few occasions. I think from there, you could form a pattern to a persons behavior, be like "I appreciate your art, but I won't be going to your live shows" instead of just not supporting someone as groundbreaking as MF DOOM.
I can understand if the case is someone being morally reprehensible, but I hardly find what DOOM did to be that bad, since you know, Fyre festival. That is a case in ethics.