Japanese Sales: 2012 Jul 02 - Jul 08

Last time L5 announced a game with no platform was TT, and it turned out to be 3DS (with PSP/Vita ports). Ghoul Watch seems like Wii U given the quality of the visuals, plus the "second screen" ghost catching seems like it's tailor made for the Gamepad.

I also used to think it could be Vita, but the way things are going now, even if it was at one point I doubt it is now.

This game will absolutely crater. These cross media franchises rarely ever gain a threshold on consoles. I don't mind since it's one step closer to Dark Cloud 3.
 
This game will absolutely crater. These cross media franchises rarely ever gain a threshold on consoles. I don't mind since it's one step closer to Dark Cloud 3.
Inazuma Strikers did decently, Ninokuni HD cratered. I think if Yokai Watch is a Wii U game it could go either way.

The only way you'll ever see Dark Cloud 3 is if Hino buys the IP off SCEI... and if that happens it'll probably end up a 3DS game. :3
 
Man I'm watching some footage of Time Travelers online, the game looks amazing. I'll be really sad if the game sells poorly. Especially if it doesn't get localized.
 
It was never going to get localised anyway.

Isn't this game made my the director of 999? That game got localized, and didn't Level 5 open up their own office in the US? I'd hope these developments point towards a possible localization, maybe an eshop release if Level 5 thinks it would make any money.
 
Isn't this game made my the director of 999? That game got localized, and didn't Level 5 open up their own office in the US? I'd hope these developments point towards a possible localization, maybe an eshop release if Level 5 thinks it would make any money.

By the director of 428, which was never localised. Now the differences are that 428 had live action sequences and was published by another company, but Level 5 doesn't have the best localisation record at the best of times. And while this game doesn't have live action sequences, it has very extensive voice work.
 
Isn't this game made my the director of 999? That game got localized, and didn't Level 5 open up their own office in the US? I'd hope these developments point towards a possible localization, maybe an eshop release if Level 5 thinks it would make any money.
Jiro Ishii was behind 428. There really is no certainty that Time Travelers will be localized with the level of text and voice work a game like it contains.

The director of 999 was Kotaro Uchikoshi. He's already made the second Zero Escape and that is being localized.
 
By the director of 428, which was never localised. Now the differences are that 428 had live action sequences and was published by another company, but Level 5 doesn't have the best localisation record at the best of times. And while this game doesn't have live action sequences, it has very extensive voice work.

Ah, I got mixed up. Well I live in hope.
 
Inazuma Strikers did decently, Ninokuni HD cratered. I think if Yokai Watch is a Wii U game it could go either way.

The only way you'll ever see Dark Cloud 3 is if Hino buys the IP off SCEI... and if that happens it'll probably end up a 3DS game. :3

lol no

While Level-5 makes games for every platform (that isn't made by Microsoft) it seems they're still close to SCE. They're still doing updates and stuff to White Knight Chronicles 2 for some reason, and SCEJ is running a few marketing initiatives for Time Travelers. If things really go sour for Level-5 I fully expect them to run back to Sony's side.
 
Also due to big pricedrops (wasnt it sold for as low as 900 yen at the end? Or maybe i'm mixing it up with one of the Zelda DS games). I agree that 500k is good, but if many people wont buy it before the game is very cheap, it depends on how the serie will go further.

I don't remember its price dropped so dramatically; price was cut, of course, but to a lesser extent.

The fact is that Ni no Kuni costed more than average DS game, because of the book. It's reasonable to think that people did not find worth buying the game at such price, but there did with a lower price; indeed it sold incredible well over time for being a jRPG (170k fist week - over 500k LTD).

That's why I think Ni no Kuni was a perfect fit on DS, but its success was constrained by the book.
 
lol no

While Level-5 makes games for every platform (that isn't made by Microsoft) it seems they're still close to SCE. They're still doing updates and stuff to White Knight Chronicles 2 for some reason, and SCEJ is running a few marketing initiatives for Time Travelers. If things really go sour for Level-5 I fully expect them to run back to Sony's side.

Yeah, because Level 5 has nothing to do with Nintendo nowadays... Some update for one of its games on PS3 versus Layton and Inazuma parternship in the West and the most part of its line-up on Nintendo hardware.
 
Yeah, because Level 5 has nothing to do with Nintendo nowadays... Some update for one of its games on PS3 versus Layton and Inazuma parternship in the West and the most part of its line-up on Nintendo hardware.

I agree with this in the sense that Level 5 doesn't have a special partnership with anyone. They have a lot of working relationships but none of them seem more important than any other.

Considering Hino made a deliberate move towards greater independance I can't see Level 5 making more games for any of the platform holders unless given a major financial incentive to do so.
 
Yeah, because Level 5 has nothing to do with Nintendo nowadays... Some update for one of its games on PS3 versus Layton and Inazuma parternship in the West and the most part of its line-up on Nintendo hardware.

You realize SCE was set to release LBX in the west right? The only reason Level-5 even exists is because of SCE.
 
You realize SCE was set to release LBX in the west right? The only reason Level-5 even exists is because of SCE.
Really? The only reason they've continued to exist is because of their successes on Nintendo platforms. This is too much, even for you.
 
Really? The only reason they've continued to exist is because of their successes on Nintendo platforms. This is too much, even for you.

I'm not disputing that (the argument was never even about that), but I'm fairly confident that if Level-5 is in shambles they'll be running to Sony before Nintendo. Sony and Level-5 have developed 5 titles together in the past, where as Level-5 has developed 0 titles with Nintendo.
 
lol no

While Level-5 makes games for every platform (that isn't made by Microsoft) it seems they're still close to SCE. They're still doing updates and stuff to White Knight Chronicles 2 for some reason, and SCEJ is running a few marketing initiatives for Time Travelers. If things really go sour for Level-5 I fully expect them to run back to Sony's side.

I'll have to admit that they've made worse decisions than console exclusivity for fading platforms. So this scenario, while totally impractical in this day and age, wouldn't completely surprise me.
 
You realize SCE was set to release LBX in the west right? The only reason Level-5 even exists is because of SCE.

But Level-5 is now independent, right? And now, it's closer to Nintendo than Sony, and it's thanks to Nintendo that the company could expand. If Level-5 will have some problems, it'd go to Nintendo which publish in the West their biggest franchises (and they're still some entries to be published).

Also, did not Sony avoid to publish WKC2 somewhere in the West? And did we see LBX from Sony here?
 
But Level-5 is now independent, right? And now, it's closer to Nintendo than Sony, and it's thanks to Nintendo that the company could expand. If Level-5 will have some problems, it'd go to Nintendo which publish in the West their biggest franchises (and they're still some entries to be published).

Also, did not Sony avoid to publish WKC2 somewhere in the West? And did we see LBX from Sony here?

Level-5 has always been independent. They just used to be attached to Sony's hip. Hino saw the right call for DS support, and they moved there. For what it's worth, Level-5 doesn't exactly seem loyal to anyone. Their franchises (including the ones Nintendo has published in the west) are on a variety of platforms and it seems that going forward Namco Bandai will be their partner with new properties. Probably their worst western partner yet, lol.

SCEE published WKC2 in Europe. SCEA declined, and D3 picked it up for North America. I'm not quite sure why SCEA declined given the original WKC outsold some of the titles they've greenlight for PS3 in North America. As for LBX, SCEA filed the trademarks relatively soon after the game was announced. It took Level-5 three years to actually finish that game, at which point releasing a PSP game with a major marketing campaign (that LBX would require) would be stupid. Had LBX been finished in 2009, or 2010 SCE probably would've published it elsewhere.
 
Level-5 has always been independent. They just used to be attached to Sony's hip. Hino saw the right call for DS support, and they moved there. For what it's worth, Level-5 doesn't exactly seem loyal to anyone. Their franchises (including the ones Nintendo has published in the west) are on a variety of platforms and it seems that going forward Namco Bandai will be their partner with new properties. Probably their worst western partner yet, lol.

SCEE published WKC2 in Europe. SCEA declined, and D3 picked it up for North America. I'm not quite sure why SCEA declined given the original WKC outsold some of the titles they've greenlight for PS3 in North America. As for LBX, SCEA filed the trademarks relatively soon after the game was announced. It took Level-5 three years to actually finish that game, at which point releasing a PSP game with a major marketing campaign (that LBX would require) would be stupid. Had LBX been finished in 2009, or 2010 SCE probably would've published it elsewhere.

I'm not saying the company is more loyal to one or the other hardware house. Not at all. On the contrary, I'm saying that your argument is not valid and in a part also quite obvious because you brought poor evidences to support it. I mean, you said that "if Level-5 is in shambles they'll be running to Sony before Nintendo"... Well, I'm confident Level-5 will develop another game with Sony, regardless its financial situation. It happened also after the breakthrough success of Layton with White Knight Chronicles 2.

But for you, some DLC and an attempt to publish LBX in the West (which is not happening it seems) are better reasons for Level-5 to run to Sony instead of Nintendo than the publication of its two biggest franchises (which is happening also in 2012 with the last Latyon game and Inazuma Eleven for Wii), and the vast majority of its console games on Nintendo hardware.

Ok, you want Dark Cloud 3, but don't mix your hope with facts.
 
I don't remember its price dropped so dramatically; price was cut, of course, but to a lesser extent.

The fact is that Ni no Kuni costed more than average DS game, because of the book. It's reasonable to think that people did not find worth buying the game at such price, but there did with a lower price; indeed it sold incredible well over time for being a jRPG (170k fist week - over 500k LTD).

That's why I think Ni no Kuni was a perfect fit on DS, but its success was constrained by the book.
I went back to an old MC thread to check, and you're right. It wasnt as much as 900 yen in the begining. It was dropped to around 4000 yen + - after 2-3 weeks (from 6800 yen). I'm probably mixing the 900 yen price with another game, or that was the price much later on.

EDIT: Speaking of Ni No Kuni, i like the cover for the All in One Edition (the one to the left, the picture to the right is the first edition cover).

61f%2B1vPReKL._SL500_AA300_.jpg
51q9rTNhtBL._SL500_AA300_.jpg
 
This game will absolutely crater. These cross media franchises rarely ever gain a threshold on consoles. I don't mind since it's one step closer to Dark Cloud 3.

In other words you wish Level 5 to fail in hope of a return to Sony?

Level 5 was already "independant" in the PS2 days like Gamearts was back then but they still needed a publisher to release their games. This changed a few years ago thanks to their great success with Layton due to becoming publishers themselves.

In the past two years they lost a bit of the hype surrounding them especially with Ninokuni PS3 that bombed miserably but they still have very good selling franchises on other platforms, even LBX became a decent selling franchise (game+merchandising) and with the sales of the 3rd port on 3DS there obviously is potential to keep it as a relevant Level5 franchise despite PSPs market destination and the problem that Vita just doesn´t look like to gain momentum anytime soon.
 
ninokuni ps3 didnt "bomb"

How come? It sold a bit over 100k, and it was such an ambitious project.
I'm fairly confident it has been the most expensive Level-5 game for what concerns independently published titles.

I went back to an old MC thread to check, and you're right. It wasnt as much as 900 yen in the begining. It was dropped to around 4000 yen + - after 2-3 weeks (from 6800 yen). I'm probably mixing the 900 yen price with another game, or that was the price much later on.

Spirit Tracks maybe?
Btw, 4000 yen put the game in the right price in my opinion; it was a new IP. If it sold 177k at 6800 yen and additional 200k at 4000 yen, well, that's a great result.
 
In other words you wish Level 5 to fail in hope of a return to Sony?

I'd like a new Dark Cloud, and realistically the only way that'll happen is if Level-5 gets knocked down a few pegs. Given they're seemingly keen on doing that themselves actually hoping for something good to occur from them scaling back doesn't seem that bad. The annualized sequel crap is just begging for collapse, and Hino continually making the next bet constantly on unproven properties isn't safe as Nino Kuni has demonstrated. PS3 Nino Kuni was a gigantic bomba, and while the DS one did big numbers (many of which at bargain bin prices) I suspect they wanted more.
 
I'd like a new Dark Cloud, and realistically the only way that'll happen is if Level-5 gets knocked down a few pegs. Given they're seemingly keen on doing that themselves actually hoping for something good to occur from them scaling back doesn't seem that bad. The annualized sequel crap is just begging for collapse, and Hino continually making the next bet constantly on unproven properties isn't safe as Nino Kuni has demonstrated. PS3 Nino Kuni was a gigantic bomba, and while the DS one did big numbers (many of which at bargain bin prices) I suspect they wanted more.

The problem is that Sony just doesn´t look like to be interested in "Dark Cloud", they prefered WKC, WKC2 und WKCp instead, so I doubt a ruined Level5 will be of any help in that matter. Sony just doesn´t care, just like they didn´t care for a new Legend of Dragoon.
 
Spirit Tracks maybe?
Btw, 4000 yen put the game in the right price in my opinion; it was a new IP. If it sold 177k at 6800 yen and additional 200k at 4000 yen, well, that's a great result.
It could be. I remember seeing Spirit Tracks for less than 1000 yen for sure (maybe 2-3 months after launch i think).

Yep, Ni No Kuni did sell pretty good on the DS. No idea what the expectations were for Level 5 (same goes for the PS3 version), but the number itself was not bad for a new IP indeed :)
 
I thnk that's very hard to see, up to now, a L5 future distant from Nintendo platform.
I don't neither think that they'll become "nintendo exclusive" or something like that...
 
I'd like a new Dark Cloud, and realistically the only way that'll happen is if Level-5 gets knocked down a few pegs. Given they're seemingly keen on doing that themselves actually hoping for something good to occur from them scaling back doesn't seem that bad. The annualized sequel crap is just begging for collapse, and Hino continually making the next bet constantly on unproven properties isn't safe as Nino Kuni has demonstrated. PS3 Nino Kuni was a gigantic bomba, and while the DS one did big numbers (many of which at bargain bin prices) I suspect they wanted more.

How many copies did Ni no Kuni sell at bargain bin prices? Given that a bargain big price should be around 1000 yen, and the game is still sold over that threshold (Amazon has it at 2200 yen).
 
How many copies did Ni no Kuni sell at bargain bin prices? Given that a bargain big price should be around 1000 yen, and the game is still sold over that threshold (Amazon has it at 2200 yen).

Yeah, no. Maybe that's your idea of bomba bin pricing, but that's certainly not the case. You can look up the late 2010 and early 2011 Media Create threads to find pictures of the game price slashed. In fact, I'll spare you some time:

ZNpg8.jpg


From early January 2011, after the game had only sold about 330k of that beautiful 600k shipment. The game's price was already slashed by 2000 yen at that point.

The problem is that Sony just doesn´t look like to be interested in "Dark Cloud", they prefered WKC, WKC2 und WKCp instead, so I doubt a ruined Level5 will be of any help in that matter. Sony just doesn´t care, just like they didn´t care for a new Legend of Dragoon.

There was a sequel to LoD in development. For whatever reason it was canceled. Given SCEJ experienced success with Over My Dead Body, I suspect Kawano and friends may be looking over their history and trying to bring some of that back.
 
Yeah, no. Maybe that's your idea of bomba bin pricing, but that's certainly not the case. You can look up the late 2010 and early 2011 Media Create threads to find pictures of the game price slashed. In fact, I'll spare you some time:

From early January 2011, after the game had only sold about 330k of that beautiful 600k shipment. The game's price was already slashed by 2000 yen at that point.

So the game sold 177k at full price, more than 200k at the average DS game price (around 4000 yen), and the remaining at some price we don't know. Btw, is 4000 yen a bargain bin price? No. Did Ni no Kuni underperform? Yes. Was Ni no Kuni a success for what it was? Yes.
 
I'm pretty sure L5 is more happy with DS sales of Nino than PS3s ones, despite a portion of the sales happening at a lower price.

It's laughable to think they would run to Sony rather than Nintendo, yeah that's why most of their support is on Nintendo consoles...

Don't forget WKC happened before everyone knew how much the PS3 was gonna crater, and I'm sure it even happened is more due to Sony wanting it rather than L5.
 
I'm pretty sure L5 is more happy with DS sales of Nino than PS3s ones, despite a portion of the sales happening at a lower price

No one was arguing this. Nino Kuni PS3 is probably one of the biggest Japanese made bombas in recent times. Probably only Dragon's Bomba rivals it for biggest discrepancy between budget and sales.
 
I'm pretty sure L5 is more happy with DS sales of Nino than PS3s ones, despite a portion of the sales happening at a lower price.

it's laughable to think they would rub to Sony rather than Nintendo, yeah that's why most of their support is on Nintendo consoles...

Takao could just desire Nintendo to ask Level 5 doing an RPG with many similarity with Dark Cloud, and a similar name, Black Sky. And it'd be fine, right Takao? XD
 
Takao could just desire Nintendo to ask Level 5 doing an RPG with many similarity with Dark Cloud, and a similar name, Black Sky. And it'd be fine, right Takao? XD

Why would they ask Nintendo? If they had the desire to make another collect-a-thon RPG with characters who are above the age of 12 they could certainly do it themselves. At this point Level-5 seems too big to work as a partner studio to someone else.
 
Takao could just desire Nintendo to ask Level 5 doing an RPG with many similarity with Dark Cloud, and a similar name, Black Sky. And it'd be fine, right Takao? XD
Yep spiritual successor would solve everything.

Why would they ask Nintendo? If they had the desire to make another collect-a-thon RPG with characters who are above the age of 12 they could certainly do it themselves. At this point Level-5 seems too big to work as a partner studio to someone else.
Dunno bout that, their success rate on hit new IPs is pretty low these days.
 
Takao could just desire Nintendo to ask Level 5 doing an RPG with many similarity with Dark Cloud, and a similar name, Black Sky. And it'd be fine, right Takao? XD

There´s a problem, I don´t think Nintendo will ask them to make a game on a playstation system ;)
 
I don´t think they´ll have any big problems in the coming years. Layton is still very popular, not as successful as a few years back but I think you get the idea, Inazuma Eleven basically the same with a rising fanbase in Europe and to a lesser degree even LB (game+merchandising). I don´t know if they have given up on Ninokuni but in my opinion it has potential to be a decent selling series, releasing it on a more family and kids friendly userbase may help.

Of course they can´t take another financial disaster like Ninokuni PS3 but they likely won´t have bigger problems if they moderate their budgets. Imo they should also start to take a little more care of their franchises and limit their output.
 
I don´t think they´ll have any big problems in the coming years. Layton is still very popular, not as successful as a few years back but I think you get the idea, Inazuma Eleven basically the same with a rising fanbase in Europe and to a lesser degree even LB (game+merchandising). I don´t know if they have given up on Ninokuni but in my opinion it has potential to be a decent selling series, releasing it on a more family and kids friendly userbase may help.

Of course they can´t take another financial disaster like Ninokuni PS3 but they likely won´t have bigger problems if they moderate their budgets. Imo they should also start to take a little more care of their franchises and limit their output.

You know, I just took a quick look at Level 5 sales, and I think you are correct. Inazuma and Layton are still reasonably strong, and Little Battlers is selling ok. Even Ni no kuni did alright on DS.

Their new stuff lately is really what is failing., but I don't get the impression that Girls RPG and Guild 1 were huge money sinks or anything.
 
Why in the world would Level 5 ever "run back" to Sony? Nintendo would certainly help them out if they ever needed it and they've experienced much greater success on Nintendo platforms than any other. It sounds like some extreme wishful thinking that even if they did go to Sony it would somehow save them.
 
Why in the world would Level 5 ever "run back" to Sony? Nintendo would certainly help them out if they ever needed it and they've experienced much greater success on Nintendo platforms than any other. It sounds like some extreme wishful thinking that even if they did go to Sony it would somehow save them.

Yeah that makes little sense. Where would they run to? Vita? PS4? Come on.
 
Top Bottom