VolticArchangel
Member
Oh this dude.
Now, about that free online multiplayer without the GOLD paywall on Xbox...
Now, about that free online multiplayer without the GOLD paywall on Xbox...
That would be huge. I'm surprised they haven't done this yet. At least roll gold into gamepass.Oh this dude.
Now, about that free online multiplayer without the GOLD paywall on Xbox...
The problem with Grubb is he races to Tweet every single thing he hears without attempting to confirm anything hoping to be the first to say it.
He then loves throwing out the Tweets for just pure attention and throw his hands up saying its on you for believing it as he meant it to be a joke.
Much like this story here, yeah a lot of buzz about this last couple of days but most people aren't going to know shit about acquisitions take Activision as a great example.
So yeah as a "source" he should be banned
Why would it be bad news? So you mean Sony should just sit and wait until all the others big industry ogres will eat everything?It would be a first for sony to do this. Which is just bad news going forward for everybody because they will do it again in the future. If they buy square enix, they will also buy capcom in the future.
It was in flux iirc. Nintendo of course didn’t pan out perfectly. He adjusted things if they changed and it seemed to be more of a compiled list of public information.Did he get the dates right? Did he get anything else right?
I think it’s an appropriate take to have. I feel like we are missing the pre-E3 hype this year and biting on every little rumor.So he's heard about this, yet said NOTHING about Embracer Group buying CD, Eidos Montreal, the third western SE studio or those IP? Not even so much as hint that it was happening?
Can people stop buying into anything this dude says? He's doing nothing more than speculating; we ALL speculate. Hell the speculation over here has been better and that's not up for debate.
Sony acquiring SE before they got rid of Tomb Raider, Deus Ex, Hitman and the talented studios behind those franchises would've made a lot of sense, but now I don't see any need to do so. It would actually make more sense for Nintendo to buy them at this point.
In fact I don't understand why Sony didn't purchase those IPs and studios that Embracer picked up. $300M is chump change to Sony and Tomb Raider and Deus Ex becoming first party franchises would've been seen as a huge coup.
Capcom have better ips, teams and fit with Sony.
Square now is only kh, ff e dq.
It would be strange for Sony to purchase Square Enix for roughly the same price when they’ve just jettisoned valuable legacy IPs and the talented staff of Crystal Dynamics and Eidos.
They could do with Square the same movement they did with Bungie: to don't integrate it under PS Studios but to place it under SIE, where it would continue publishing using the Square label full multiplatform, with some (or maybe even all) games becoming PS timed exclusive, securig for all their games game subs exclusivity for PS+, demos/betas exclusivity, marketing exclusivity and game + console bundle exclusivity. And blocking any exclusivity with MS or Nintendo.
Why would SquareEnix sell themselves to Sony when so much of their console profit is coming from Nintendo? Especially in Japan?
Dev costs on Switch would be a lot cheaper than PS5.Nintendo would have a heart attack if they had to pay to develope games like final fantasy and kingdom hearts lol
Sure. Then people will finally see that the game is garbageHear me out
Vagrant Story remake by Bluepoint
Nobody outside of them do, less they be investigated for insider trading.Remember when all the insiders leaked Bungie going to Sony and Activision/Bethesda going to MS? These deals are on a need to know basis so unless you think high level corporate execs are talking to Grubb and Speshal Ed on discord to the benefit of nobody at all this all tales from my ass.
Doubtful.
If Sony wanted to buy Square Enix they'd want the Eidos part too.
Not only for Tomb Raider and other IP's
But I assume the Marvel license goes with the studio's?
Unless they was a game deal.
But still why wouldn't Sony want Final Fantasy & Tomb Raider which are Two of the biggest OG Playstation IP's under their umbrella.
There is also the very real possibility that Sony found those studios redundant to their current strategy. Crystal Dynamics and Eidos Montreal would just be more of the same for the kinds of games Sony is already very well known for. Also, their profit margins being as low as they are probably didn't help. Tomb Raider was really the only IP with any significant value and the commercial success of that franchise has seen a stark decline since the reboot's success. It also heavily overlaps with Uncharted thematically. No need to go out and spend hundreds of millions to get Lara Croft when you already have Nathan Drake and Chloe Frazer. Best to hold onto that cash and go for something more useful. Like Ark System Works for your fighting game ambitions, since you don't have any of your own, or securing Deviation Games for your even bigger live-service push.Maybe Square selling their Western developers has something to do with FTC or whatever US regulations there are.
They have a bit more than just that. Brave Fencer Mushashi, Einhander, Parasite Eve, Ergheiz, Chrono Trigger, Live a Live, Romancing SaGa, etc. They may not be as big-name as KH, FF & DQ but they have their fans and quality history.
Square-Enix are predominantly known for their Japanese IPs, though.
Might be a sound strategy from Sony's POV but it really wouldn't mean too much to myself unless it ensured some quality revivals. Einhander should've gotten a sequel decades ago, Brave Fencer Mushashi could've been their answer to Goemon and longer-running, Parasite Eve would benefit from a really good remake, etc.
But otherwise there isn't much to say here because these rumors of Sony buying Square are only kicking up again because Grubb wants attention, nothing more. Like for real, how would they know about this yet not know anything about what just happened yesterday?![]()
Musashi was great but I think it was maybe a bit too niche/too Japanese focused for modern days. Now big publishers prefer games with a more global appeal so would skip games like Goemon. Musashi maybe was in the limit, with them not sure if popular enough to revive it.Might be a sound strategy from Sony's POV but it really wouldn't mean too much to myself unless it ensured some quality revivals. Einhander should've gotten a sequel decades ago, Brave Fencer Mushashi could've been their answer to Goemon and longer-running, Parasite Eve would benefit from a really good remake, etc.
Yes, I highly doubt he heard anything at all. He's only guessing stuff like the rest of us and it isn't hard to reach the conclussion that Sony could be interested on Square because it's an excellent fit:But otherwise there isn't much to say here because these rumors of Sony buying Square are only kicking up again because Grubb wants attention, nothing more. Like for real, how would they know about this yet not know anything about what just happened yesterday?![]()
Facts.tune in to leakers, insiders and empty podcast were people who roll a dice to make topics so that they get them those sweat patreon bucks from news starved gamers.
I thought for sure it was Ubisoft.
Why would SquareEnix sell themselves to Sony when so much of their console profit is coming from Nintendo? Especially in Japan?
Triangle Strategy (a game I love btw) sold 800m, which is relatively good for a smaller budget game,
Please dont waste money on Square Enix.
A bunch of terrible JRPG's and bad looking games like Forespoken. Save your money.
I'm not really sure SE is as good a get vs companies like Fromsoft and Capcom.
In my opinion Sony should just go after 2 of the 3:
Fromsoft
CD Project Red
Capcom.
Ok, we're waiting to hear you out....Hear me out
Vagrant Story remake by Bluepoint
That's not really true. The launch platforms for Dragon Quest since the PS1 are:Almost all Dragon Quest games since the PS1 launched were at least launched as PlayStation exclusives.
Sony gets some key exclusives but it's only a small part of SE's total output.Why would Sony buy Sqaure when they get most of their games exclusively already?
I’m not talking about the business side of things, I’m talking about for my own personal tastes. I don’t give a damn about any of their gamesAny studio with the money would absolutely gobble up the rights to Final Fantasy. Like, do you even know how to do "bidness?"
MS: "Best I can do is attempt to double the price of Gold".Oh this dude.
Now, about that free online multiplayer without the GOLD paywall on Xbox...
And this rabid neckbeard needed yet *another* GAF thread because?
Ok, I was not counting the MMO. And XI only came out on 3DS in Japan. In the west it launched as a PS4 exclusive.That's not really true. The launch platforms for Dragon Quest since the PS1 are:
VII - PS1
VIII - PS2
IX - DS
X - Wii
XI - PS4 / 3DS
Sony gets some key exclusives but it's only a small part of SE's total output.
It'll be the first game to sell three quintillion copies across the galaxy but only if they release it on the Sega Gamecast.
Yes if you only look at the Western releases of mainline games then the statement is accurate.Ok, I was not counting the MMO. And XI only came out on 3DS in Japan. In the west it launched as a PS4 exclusive.
Looking at their wider finances, it looks like the wester studios represented about 6% of their 2021 revenue. So perhaps not a huge change in price. That said, that revenue number doesn't properly capture the value of the IPs that Square just let go.
Regardless, after looking at Square's finances, a deal that is at a 20% premium to today's price would still be a steal from a financial perspective. It would have Square being purchased at a 12 P/E ratio and a 2 P/S ratio. It would be a pretty cheap way to increase revenue at PlayStation. Here is how that would look:
For a purchase price of $6B, Sony would add $3B revenue and $480M profit to their PlayStation division. That would represent a 12% increase in overall PlayStation revenue and a 15% increase in profits. Not a bad deal from a pure finance perspective at all.
Here's how that compares to Microsoft purchase of Activision Blizzard.
Purchase Price: $68.7B
P/E ratio: 25.4 ($2.7B profit in 2021)
P/S ratio: 7.8 ($8.8B revenue in 2021)
We're talking about a 200% difference in P/E ratios and 390% difference in P/S ratio. Not bad at all. Ofcourse, Activision has a particularly high P/E and P/S ratio due to market dominance, potential for growth, and current growth rates.
Musashi was great but I think it was maybe a bit too niche/too Japanese focused for modern days. Now big publishers prefer games with a more global appeal so would skip games like Goemon. Musashi maybe was in the limit, with them not sure if popular enough to revive it.
I see more potential for Parasite Eve, even if the original ones weren't supersellers I think that a reboot could work: AAA ARPG with somewhat realistic Japanese like visuals, a hot and elegant blonde female as main protagonist, a bit of horror... I see it, and also think that is a project that I can see being made by different Sony or Square teams.
I think that if Sony wants some small shooter for PS+ or VR they could hire someone to make it or to give it to Housemarque.
Yes, I highly doubt he heard anything at all. He's only guessing stuff like the rest of us and it isn't hard to reach the conclussion that Sony could be interested on Square because it's an excellent fit:
- It's public, from multiple official sources, that Sony plans to make more acquisitions and even is hiring people to work on this so there are multiple or big acquisitions coming
- They have a lot of money and almost no debt, can afford big acquisitions. Sony could afford to buy SE
- MS did big publisher acquisitions so SIE could react doing the same
- Sony in a corporate level (not only gaming) has as one of their current goals to acquire content for their store and services
- SIE likes to acquire companies who worked on many PS exclusives, SE has a ton of them
- SIE likes to acquire companies who would help them cover genres/game types not covered by their 1st party (in this case RPG)
- SIE wants to grow in PC, other consoles (in this case seems that wihtout using PS Studios for this) and specially mobile
- SIE would welcome old classics from past generations to fill PS+ and to have more new top AAA in their portfolio to fill roadmaps
- SIE wants to bring PS IPs with potential to be used in movies, tv shows or anime, so better if owned by them
- SIE wants to grow in Asia, a huge Japanese publisher would help
- SIE wants to grow in GaaS, FFXIV is the best performing MMORPG as of now
- SIE wants to grow in mobile and bring their IPs to mobile, SE has been very successful at this
- With Bungie they started a way to place there publishers who can be under SIE but continue being full multiplatform to secure them for their console and service, and pretty likely get secondary exclusives from them (game subs, demos/betas, bundles) and block any exclusive for the competition