• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Kotaku: Next Xbox will require online connection to start games

B.O.O.M

Member
Hey Kaz! How many minutes can you be offline before getting kicked out of a Durango game?



That is correct!

haha well done good sir

Quite the overreaction, it's just like with netflix, you require internet service to consume. It's obvious that Microsoft will sell their service in a way where you simply won't want to play offline. I already feel bad for people buying PS4 over Durango knowing that Microsoft is playing this wildcard, it just justifies the service that much more if they are implementing such a policy. Can't wait

wtf am I even reading...is this the real life

There are people who actually defend such a move (if true)...yikes
 
Interesting that Kotaku breaking news about the PS4 controller's touchpad and share button, breaking news about Doom 4's troubled development cycle, showing video and images from Star Wars: First Assault, breaking news about LucasFilm shuttering LucasArts and canceling their games, showing concept art from the Boba Fett version of Star Wars 1313, telling the story of what really happened to Aliens: Colonial Marines, and many, many more stories just weren't enough to get some NeoGAFfers to trust that maybe we know what we're doing.

But hey, we'll just keep on keeping on. :)
You already earned GAF's trust by writing excellent articles and admitting to your own mistakes. The same cannot be said about all Kotaku's writers unfortunately.
 

kingocfs

Member
I assume registering the game is connected to the install to hard drive feature. If it is, it would be as simply as being online when you start the game and while it installs, once completed, the licence would transfer to the account/console to allow for playing from the hard drive without the need for the disc.

This is what I think this means as well.
 

shandy706

Member
From their own article..

"other sources familiar with the codenamed Durango console have told us that they are still unaware of any Microsoft plans regarding an online requirement" - Kotaku

So here's the question "sources" there is plural. Do we have "two sources" saying it does require online and then "five sources" saying it won't be?

I'd love clarification there. There's just no way to know who to believe....(head asplodes)



Seriously though Microsoft...it's time to say SOMETHING.


Edit** As a side note, I can't INSTALL any of my Steam games without an Internet connection....but I can play (most of) them offline.
 

Satchel

Banned
Gonna be interesting of see the way this is actually implemented.

My consoles are always online, but sometimes for some random unknown reason it drops out. Sometimes I have or restart the modem. Would suck to not be able to keep going.

Maybe its the connection that's required just to start and verify the disk? Hopefully.
 

Dash Kappei

Not actually that important
So I don't get many inside scoop honestly and I'll never put my GAF account at risk so take it with more than a grain of salt but my good friend at Treyarch, the one who told me about COD:blops2 back in the wust days when it wasn't announced yet, told me that:

online connection is indeed required to start games for the first time
kinect integration like manu navigation is mandatory for every game but it's actually done at system level
used games are not blocked per se

Hardly breaking-news info but I thought maybe someone would have been interested in such speculation nontheless
 

Paches

Member
I always have an Internet connection anyhow, but I still don't like this. Enough to not buy one though? Probably not. By the time next gen is over, Apple and Microsoft will have my every damn move tracked both inside and outside my house. This is our future.

And the worst part? You let them in.
 

Takuya

Banned
From their own article..

"other sources familiar with the codenamed Durango console have told us that they are still unaware of any Microsoft plans regarding an online requirement" - Kotaku

So here's the question "sources" there is plural. Do we have "two sources" saying it does require online and then "five sources" saying it won't be?

I'd love clarification there. There's just no way to know who to believe....(head asplodes)
Not that it "won't be" just that they aren't aware of it. There's a big difference.
 
I think there's room to stick to it, tbh. If you're up-front, honest, and push it with the right exclusive content, you could have what's basically the Microsoft Gamecube of making $5bn profit as $200 each from 20m users rather than $40 each from 100m.

It might even be healthy for the industry as a whole, as Sony can hold prices higher with the only mainstream "power system" and Nintendo can then ride the price differential to at least keep Wii U barely relevant until a new system in 2016 or so.

It would be devastating for American AAA development who rely on a massive userbase, heaping gobs of marketing money from both sides, shared platform interests with MS, and the Live juggernaut phenomenon that doesn't seem to occur with PSN or even Steam as much.

Very good points, I find it hard to disagree on most of them apart from the MS GC.

I can't see them being happy going from 77m down to 20m or thereabouts. They will be looking to increase their market-share, not limit it and this is exactly what this feature does. It limits their growth/,market-share.
 

Krakatoa

Member
I still believe it will be the same way as now. If you download or install the content on the xbox. Then you can be offline and play.

If you download or run the game on another xbox you need to be signed into live.
 
So I don't get many inside scoop honestly and I'll never put my GAF account at risk so take it with more than a grain of salt but my good friend at Treyarch, the one who told me about COD:blops2 back in the wust days when it wasn't announced yet, told me that:

online connection is indeed required to start games for the first time
kinect integration like manu navigation is mandatory for every game but it's actually done at system level
used games are not blocked per se

Hardly breaking-news info but I thought maybe someone would have been interested in such speculation nontheless

Hmmm. Noted.
 

Master_JO

Banned
Notable:



Wonder what "these kinds of things" means, but I'll take their word for it.

But this is weird:


In conjunction with the article mentioning how not all developers are aware of the same stuff, is it possible MS is feeding devs different info to see who's leaking they're plans? Always on all the time as a previous rumour before these devs were even aware?

This is also pretty significant, and will be overlooked amongst the fury in this thread:

Perhaps a dev-kit only thing + devs being told different things to snuff out leaks? Sounds like a good way to keep people from leaking stuff from your actual runtime if you ask me.

Kudos bro. Long time since I'V READ something so smart in gaf.
 
Ok folks... seriously... I've had internet go down like 3 times in the last 2 years. Each outage lasted maybe a few hours at most. I really do not see the big deal. Not being able to play a few hours in a given year is something that I don't even blink an eye to! So help me understand... why is this a big deal?
 
Microsoft has had such terrible PR leading up to the announcement, such terrible word of mouth, and such a terrible time combating rumors that if Don Mattrick showed a cardboard box with 720 written on it and walked off stage people would shit themselves with excitement due to the low standards set.
 

RetroStu

Banned
Could this be lost in translation and it actually refers to used games where you need to enter a code online to use it or something?, although even that would be shitty.
 

Hoo-doo

Banned
So what positive features can gamers expect from this move? I mean, if it's true, they are going to spin this like a merry go-round.
I can't honestly think of a single positive thing this restriction brings, not for any consumer out there.

Ok folks... seriously... I've had internet go down like 3 times in the last 2 years. Each outage lasted maybe a few hours at most. I really do not see the big deal. Not being able to play a few hours in a given year is something that I don't even blink an eye to! So help me understand... why is this a big deal?

Do you live in some kind of isolation bubble where only your experience is representative and only your opinion matters? Read the thread.
 
I can just imagine it now. You're just about to beat a boss and get to a save or autosave. You're Internet connection cuts out and BAM! Not only can you not play your game, you're gonna have to do that boss again :p

Just like your electricity cutting out, now you have to worry about the Internet as well.
 

legacyzero

Banned
Kaz and Cerny are kicking back right now going "AWW YISS"

Seriosly not buying this console if this and anti used rumors are true.
 

poodpick

Member
Ok folks... seriously... I've had internet go down like 3 times in the last 2 years. Each outage lasted maybe a few hours at most. I really do not see the big deal. Not being able to play a few hours in a given year is something that I don't even blink an eye to! So help me understand... why is this a big deal?

Because there is absolutely no reason to require an internet connection to start an application that benefits the consumer!
 

hawk2025

Member
At some point you need to start letting your work speak for itself and not try to combat every person that doubts Kotaku. The self-congratulatory smugness complete with emoticons doesn't help you as much as it makes you feel better.

Do you think this post actually convinced anyone who was already deadset on disagreeing with the credibility of the story? If anything, all it did was embarrass people who didn't write it off immediately and you can count me as a primary source on that.

It actually did a good job of convincing me, actually.
 

B.O.O.M

Member
So I don't get many inside scoop honestly and I'll never put my GAF account at risk so take it with more than a grain of salt but my good friend at Treyarch, the one who told me about COD:blops2 back in the wust days when it wasn't announced yet, told me that:

online connection is indeed required to start games for the first time
kinect integration like manu navigation is mandatory for every game but it's actually done at system level
used games are not blocked per se


Hardly breaking-news info but I thought maybe someone would have been interested in such speculation nontheless

-_- ms stahp


and what does 'used games not blocked "per se" ' mean?
 
This is what I think this means as well.

It does seem to be most obvious reason for having a feature at the initial launch of a game. What is important is that will a connection be required every time you want to play after installation? My gut tells me there will be such a requirement, but being the optimistic that I am, I hope for the best in that there won't be such a requirement.
 

WalkMan

Banned
wtf am I even reading...is this the real life

There are people who actually defend such a move (if true)...yikes

Think of it like youtube for instance, you can only use it online and in turn youtube is able to feed you ads. Youtube for obvious reasons values an online user than an offline one that cannot consume content. It's clear that Microsoft will have numerous services to entertain your time and keep you online in order to continue to feed ad content to you. I have also mentioned previously that they are likely to subsidize the cost of the new console as well to get even more people onboard, so there's that aspect.
 

UrbanRats

Member
Microsoft has had such terrible PR leading up to the announcement, such terrible word of mouth, and such a terrible time combating rumors that if Don Mattrick showed a cardboard box with 720 written on it and walked off stage people would shit themselves with excitement due to the low standards set.
So you're saying it's a strategy.
So what positive features can gamers expect from this move? I mean, if it's true, they are going to spin this like a merry go-round.
I can't honestly think of a single positive thing this restriction brings, not for any consumer out there.
You uuuh.. can be always.. connected, so.. ehm..
 

wildfire

Banned
Only way this will take off is if it replaces default DVR's and cable boxes.

BINGO!

I actually believe most people in this thread who said they won't buy an Xbox because they will view this as gaming machine first.

But if MS sells it as DVR/Cable box then some of those people will definitely buy this system just save costs as long as the price hike on their cable bill doesn't go up by too much.

More importantly in the larger market the people who care about TV and movies more than gaming will eat this system up.


The only way to punish Microsoft for this is if Sony and Nintendo make a big move to offer streaming TV and movies and instead of charging an inflated cable subscription fee you just pay the upfront cost of their console. That way everyone against this move can heavily promote those platforms over MS because while their upfront cost will be higher their cost over time will be far lower.

So here's the question "sources" there is plural. Do we have "two sources" saying it does require online and then "five sources" saying it won't be?

I'd love clarification there. There's just no way to know who to believe....(head asplodes)

They have two sources confirming always online. One of them has been 100% accurate so far.

All the other sources who don't know about it are less reliable and are unable to disprove this claim through whatever means they have.
 

GashPrex

NeoGaf-Gold™ Member
I must be the only person who has no problem with the always online requirement for games - I can't remember the last time I played my PS3/360/Steam when I wasn't signed in to the service online.
 

DesertFox

Member
So when the moron working on utilities down the street from my house cuts my cable connection, I'll have 3 minutes to save my progress before I'm locked out of my game for 1-2 weeks while they repair it? Awesome...

Please MS, for the love of all that is holy don't do this.
Matrix+-+Not+Like+This.gif
..

edit: Then again.... I could always just turn my smartphone into a wifi hotspot and hook up to that. But that will definitely not suffice for multiplayer gaming.
 
I love the " unless they changed it" part. So if it's not true, Kotaku can just claim MS changed their mind. Real ballsy reporting, Kotaku.
 

Donos

Member
Really no way. Just think about this. Think again. Just no way.

I'm starting to think that this stuff comes from MS intentionally to troll people.

Then at the Durango reveal it's just a very powerful next gen console on par with PS4 with 1-2 major payed 3rd party exclusives plus impressive showings of their first party stuff with a good price. Boom.
 
So you're saying it's a strategy.

You uuuh.. can be always.. connected, so.. ehm..

No, because a strategy would imply that they planned this. What I'm saying is that this thing is a focus tested nightmare and they still don't know how they're going to unveil it.
 

RetroStu

Banned
From their own article..

"other sources familiar with the codenamed Durango console have told us that they are still unaware of any Microsoft plans regarding an online requirement" - Kotaku

So here's the question "sources" there is plural. Do we have "two sources" saying it does require online and then "five sources" saying it won't be?

I'd love clarification there. There's just no way to know who to believe....(head asplodes)



Seriously though Microsoft...it's time to say SOMETHING.


Edit** As a side note, I can't INSTALL any of my Steam games without an Internet connection....but I can play (most of) them offline.
Sounds more like Kotaku are covering all the bases so to speak, in fact i just can't see this happeining and i won't believe it until Microsoft says it themselves, it just doesn't make business sense to me.
 
Weren't they just reposting already known leaks?

Well, for the PS4 controller I think there's came after Joystiq, but the pics were totally different.

I think their timing was just behind other outlets, but evidence seems to state that they have their own source.
 
Ok folks... seriously... I've had internet go down like 3 times in the last 2 years. Each outage lasted maybe a few hours at most. I really do not see the big deal. Not being able to play a few hours in a given year is something that I don't even blink an eye to! So help me understand... why is this a big deal?
Remember when Xbox Live was down (off and on) for a couple weeks (2007-2008)? Remember when PSN was down for 24 days (2011)? How would you feel about not even being able to play single player games during those times? Or do you think those things are never going to happen again?
 
I'm assuming that I will no longer "own" or have control over "my" games if this is true. I'll be cool with that as long as all retail games are $5-$10.

No way am I spending upwards of $70 just to have my game locked into some subscription or console.
 
I must be the only person who has no problem with the always online requirement for games - I can't remember the last time I played my PS3/360/Steam when I wasn't signed in to the service online.

I've never played my 360 or PS3 offline either, but its not my connection I'm worried about. It's theirs.
 
Top Bottom