Alextended said:
Way to dodge the point. It didn't do big game numbers just because it had a demo of a big game.
Since when did "Big Game Numbers" become the point in this discussion? In case you need me to break it down for you here it is:
You dismissed the low sales of G (Far less than half of the initial sales for this port) on the grounds that it was a belated port (Umm...)
I pointed out that it had a demo included for the long-awaited sequel to what at the time (And even now) is the biggest 3rd party franchise in the country. You again dismiss this angle and I point out the absurdity of that dismissal and.... here we are in the present day.
Nice edit after someone else mentioned it showing you perhaps hadn't heard of that easy one yourself. Well, exceptions to the rules and all that.
I honestly just thought to give an example, didn't bother to refresh the page so no, I never saw his message and even if I had I don't see how it would effect the fact that I gave you an example of something you claimed to of never heard of. If you want another one: Crackdown.
And complaining about editing posts from the guy who's edited nearly every post in this thread so far? Glass houses my friend, glass houses.
And if you want to get that into the subject, how about checking how popular MHG was to begin with on all its platforms, even counting MHPortable if you want?
That's pretty generous: All versions/re-releases of the first game for PSP combined come out to roughly 1 million copies. Not that it matters much to the current discussion, but it warrants mention that MHP too was a "Years Late" port that came out a mere 3 months before Monster Hunter 2.
If the game wasn't nearly as popular as Portable 3rd has proven to be (because it really wasn't), why would a years late port of it do as good as a 6 month late port of that?
See, even ignoring it's the latest game, rather than a way outdated release with pre-existing sequels and a new one upcoming, the situation is still way in favor of 3rd over G.
No idea who you're arguing with here but I'll bite anyway:
Things were in favor of 3rd selling better? Good, because it did. And by a considerable margin at that.